The Westminster lensArchive · §02 Speeches · 1,111 contributions

Speeches by Madders.

Every Hansard contribution by Justin Madders this parliament, most recent first. Back to the MP page for the headline figures and analysed positions.

Showing 941960 of 1,111 contributions · most-recent first

← PreviousPage 48 of 56Next →
DateDebate & contributionWords
5 Dec 2024Employment Rights Bill (Eighth sitting)

I am grateful for the shadow Minister’s questions. I feel that we are embarking on an employment law masterclass, although I am not sure that I consider myself a master. The first point was about how an individual would demonstrate that an employer had believed that they were entitled to particular rights and therefore

labour-marketeconomy-jobs
259
5 Dec 2024Employment Rights Bill (Eighth sitting)

It is a pleasure to see you in the Chair, Sir Christopher. As is now our custom, I will start by referring to my entry in the Register of Members’ Financial Interests and my membership of the GMB and Unite trade unions. Government amendment 50 will expand the existing protections for employees who are dismissed as a re

labour-marketeconomy-jobs
285
5 Dec 2024Employment Rights Bill (Eighth sitting)

I beg to move amendment 50, in schedule 1, page 108, line 34, at end insert— “or the employer believes that that duty so applies, and”. This amendment extends proposed section 104BA(3) of the Employment Rights Act 1996 (dismissal is unfair if done to avoid giving a worker a guaranteed hours offer to which the worker is

labour-marketeconomy-jobs
80
5 Dec 2024Employment Rights Bill (Seventh sitting)

Amendment 46 will broaden the detriment provisions in respect of the right to guaranteed hours. It will ensure that a worker has a right not to be subjected to detriment on the grounds that the worker is, or the employer believes that the worker is, entitled to an offer of guaranteed hours. The existing provisions prot

labour-marketeconomy-jobs
199
5 Dec 2024Employment Rights Bill (Seventh sitting)

We are not talking about the general running of a business, with reference to shift notice and cancellations; we are talking about a very specific set of circumstances in which an employer’s act is considered to be detrimental to the employee and gives rise to an employment tribunal claim. I am sure that there are insu

labour-marketeconomy-jobs
286
5 Dec 2024Employment Rights Bill (Seventh sitting)

There is a danger that we will get too prescriptive about this. There will be a relatively small number of cases in which there is detriment, but they are all going to be very fact-sensitive. That is why we have framed the amendment in this way.

labour-marketeconomy-jobs
46
5 Dec 2024Employment Rights Bill (Seventh sitting)

The amendments relate to detriment claims only, whereas the shadow Minister’s question is a slightly broader one. The point about compensation in other situations would be far more detailed. As this is about people on irregular contracts who may have suffered a detriment that we cannot possibly predict in advance, it i

labour-marketeconomy-jobs
79
5 Dec 2024Employment Rights Bill (Seventh sitting)

I am grateful for the shadow Minister’s questions. They cannot be answered in the round, as all cases will be very fact-specific. The maximum that a tribunal awards will be down to the circumstances in which workers find themselves. With a zero-hours contract, there will be a whole range of issues relating to the kind

labour-marketeconomy-jobs
141
5 Dec 2024Employment Rights Bill (Seventh sitting)

The amendments will ensure that the provisions on the maximum compensation awarded by a tribunal for detriment cases will be workable for cases involving the termination of an arrangement that is not a worker’s contract. Where there is no worker’s contract in place, it may be very difficult to determine the individual’

labour-marketeconomy-jobs
316
5 Dec 2024Employment Rights Bill (Seventh sitting)

I beg to move amendment 48, in schedule 1, page 107, line 37, at end insert— “(2A) In subsection (2), for ‘and (6)’ substitute ‘, (6), (7) and (7A)’.” This amendment makes technical changes to section 49 of the Employment Rights Act 1996. The reference to subsection (7A) is consequential on amendment 49.

labour-marketeconomy-jobs
53
5 Dec 2024Employment Rights Bill (Seventh sitting)

I am grateful for the shadow Minister’s question. I recall on one or two desperate occasions quoting Hansard in an employment tribunal. I always felt, “If you’re explaining, you’re losing,” as the old phrase goes. We are not actually creating a new category of detriment. Detriment is something that already applies acro

labour-marketeconomy-jobs
180
5 Dec 2024Employment Rights Bill (Seventh sitting)

I beg to move amendment 43, in schedule 1, page 106, line 8, at end insert— “In section 27 (meaning of ‘wages’ for purposes of Part 2 of the Act), in subsection (1)— (a) after the paragraph (ce) inserted by the Neonatal Care (Leave and Pay) Act 2023 insert— ‘(cf) a payment under section 27BO(1) of this Act (payment for

labour-marketeconomy-jobs
319
5 Dec 2024Employment Rights Bill (Seventh sitting)

At the all-party parliamentary beer group’s reception last night, the shadow Minister and I talked about pubs. His question sounds perfect for a pub quiz for retired employment lawyers: it is the sort of thing that might end up getting taken to a group of KCs to understand the precise relationship. My best guess is tha

labour-marketeconomy-jobs
153
5 Dec 2024Employment Rights Bill (Seventh sitting)

I will not detain the Committee too long on clause 4. It contains amendments to the Employment Rights Act 1996 related to clauses 1 to 3, which we have just debated. Proposed new section 27BU defines various terms used in clauses 1 to 3, and the rest of part 2A of the 1996 Act, relating to zero-hours workers and other

labour-marketeconomy-jobs
174
5 Dec 2024Employment Rights Bill (Seventh sitting)

I am afraid that I will not be able to tell the shadow Minister what will not be subject to the affirmative procedure. I think that the intention is actually for the amendment to bring everything that is in scope of the clause under the affirmative procedure, but I will endeavour to confirm that and come back to him, i

labour-marketeconomy-jobs
79
5 Dec 2024Employment Rights Bill (Seventh sitting)

Amendment 42 is another technical amendment that concerns not the function of the Bill but parliamentary procedure, so if we want another dry, technical debate, we certainly have the opportunity. Clause 4 makes provision for new section 27BW to be inserted into the Employment Rights Act 1996. New section 27BW(3) would

labour-marketeconomy-jobs
342
5 Dec 2024Employment Rights Bill (Seventh sitting)

I beg to move amendment 42, in clause 4, page 23, leave out lines 34 to 39. This amendment is consequential on NC11.

labour-marketeconomy-jobs
23
5 Dec 2024Employment Rights Bill (Seventh sitting)

I am sure you always intend to be helpful, Mr Mundell. I will briefly go through the provisions of clause 3. I appreciate that we have covered a lot of the issues already, but I think it is important to set out what the clause does in the round, because after discussions on quite a few amendments, we may not have follo

labour-marketeconomy-jobs
602
5 Dec 2024Employment Rights Bill (Seventh sitting)

Thank you, Mr Mundell. I am not sure whether that was directed at me, other members of the Committee, or maybe all of us.

labour-marketeconomy-jobs
24
5 Dec 2024Employment Rights Bill (Seventh sitting)

The hon. Member is trying to have it both ways. If we had set out too much detail in the Bill, he would no doubt have criticised us for not engaging and consulting, and for being too dogmatic in our approach. That is why we have taken the approach that we have. We want to engage, consult and get the detail absolutely r

labour-marketeconomy-jobs
380
← PreviousPage 48 of 56 · click a debate to open the transcript with this MP’s speeches highlightedNext →
Sources
SourceHansard · official report
MethodEach row is one contribution (intervention or speech). Word count from the official text.