The Westminster lensArchive · §02 Speeches · 1,111 contributions

Speeches by Madders.

Every Hansard contribution by Justin Madders this parliament, most recent first. Back to the MP page for the headline figures and analysed positions.

Showing 461480 of 1,111 contributions · most-recent first

← PreviousPage 24 of 56Next →
DateDebate & contributionWords
2 Jun 2025Groceries Code Adjudicator

I thank the right hon. Member for his question. Of course, the review is dictated by the legislation that his party was, in government, involved in introducing, so part of the problem is where we are with the statutory framework, but I do take his wider point that clearly there are a number of different developments in

agricultureeconomy-jobscost-of-living
103
2 Jun 2025Groceries Code Adjudicator

I have quite a bit to get through, so if the hon. Lady does not mind, I will carry on. The statutory review is focused on the powers and duties of the GCA as set out in the 2013 Act and the 2015 order. These powers include providing arbitration between suppliers and retailers, conducting investigations into retailers s

agricultureeconomy-jobscost-of-living
573
14 May 2025Product Regulation and Metrology Bill [Lords] (Third sitting)

We have had another interesting debate—a slightly repetitious one that I am sure we are all becoming familiar with. The shadow Minister, as always, was helpful in introducing her new clauses. She is slightly optimistic about the prospect of our accepting them, but I understand that it is her role to challenge and scrut

economy-jobslocal-governmenttechnology
342
14 May 2025Product Regulation and Metrology Bill [Lords] (Third sitting)

I beg to move, That the clause be read a Second time. It is a pleasure to see you in the Chair, Ms Vaz. The Government have been clear in our intention to maintain a strong, co-operative relationship with the devolved Governments and to ensure that the devolution settlements are respected in both principle and practice

economy-jobslocal-governmenttechnology
238
14 May 2025Product Regulation and Metrology Bill [Lords] (Third sitting)

First, it is appropriate for me to acknowledge the shadow Minister’s supportive words about the excellent progress that we have made on trade deals in recent weeks. As has been mentioned, the India deal could be worth up to £2 billion a year and will hopefully unlock new opportunities across the whole UK, including for

economy-jobslocal-governmenttechnology
193
14 May 2025Product Regulation and Metrology Bill [Lords] (Third sitting)

As Opposition Members have articulated, the new clause would provide for a delay to the Secretary of State’s implementation of regulatory changes in Great Britain where Northern Ireland Assembly Members provide notification of triggering the Stormont brake on similar regulatory changes in Northern Ireland. That delay w

economy-jobslocal-governmenttechnology
312
14 May 2025Product Regulation and Metrology Bill [Lords] (Third sitting)

I thank Committee members for their contributions on this group of amendments. The Government are committed to supporting businesses and growing the economy. New clause 6 would specify that the Secretary of State must produce and maintain guidance for small and medium-sized enterprises on how to comply with any provisi

economy-jobslocal-governmenttechnology
312
14 May 2025Product Regulation and Metrology Bill [Lords] (Third sitting)

Of course, that is exactly what we are doing with the requirement to consult as part of the amendments agreed in the other place. New clause 7 would require a review of the accessibility and affordability of independent product testing and certification for SMEs under the Bill. As I have outlined, the Government alread

economy-jobslocal-governmenttechnology
247
14 May 2025Product Regulation and Metrology Bill [Lords] (Third sitting)

I recognise the important points made by hon. Members in this debate. This issue is being actively considered. Liability for damage caused by defective products is an important area of law, and we agree that there is scope for improvements to the legislation—or modernisation, if we want to describe it in that way—but t

economy-jobslocal-governmenttechnology
266
14 May 2025Product Regulation and Metrology Bill [Lords] (Third sitting)

I thank the hon. Member for Wokingham for moving the new clause, which would require the Secretary of State to introduce a list of duties on online marketplaces and to make a statement within three months of Royal Assent. As Members have recognised throughout the debate, online marketplaces now play a significant role

economy-jobslocal-governmenttechnology
474
14 May 2025Product Regulation and Metrology Bill [Lords] (Third sitting)

I thank the hon. Member for Wokingham for moving his new clause, although he is pushing his luck asking for another meeting straight off the back of his previous speech. We absolutely recognise the crucialness of the enforcement work done by local authorities. It has become clear that the existing framework of layered,

economy-jobslocal-governmenttechnology
269
14 May 2025Product Regulation and Metrology Bill [Lords] (Third sitting)

On a point of order, Ms Vaz. As we are at the end of our deliberations in Committee, I thank you and Sir John for your exemplary chairing. We have finished in good time, but we have had extensive debate on a number of matters pertaining to the Bill. I thank the Clerks and the officials from the Department who have help

economy-jobslocal-governmenttechnology
87
14 May 2025Product Regulation and Metrology Bill [Lords] (Third sitting)

Regrettably, I am not privy to the negotiations; I can only read the speculation in the newspapers, but clearly the Bill does not mean automatic alignment, dynamic or otherwise. It means the opposite, which is why a number of the arguments put forward by the Opposition are completely incorrect. I know that the 2019 ele

economy-jobslocal-governmenttechnology
161
14 May 2025Product Regulation and Metrology Bill [Lords] (Third sitting)

It is right that hon. Members have raised this matter, which is one of the primary drivers behind the Bill. We recognise that the safety of products containing lithium-ion batteries is an increasingly pressing issue, and I welcome the opportunity to speak about what the Government are doing. We are fully aware of the r

economy-jobslocal-governmenttechnology
708
13 May 2025 Carer’s Leave

I will do my best, Mr Stringer. No doubt the tension of knowing there might be an interruption will add to the excitement of my comments. It is, as always, a pleasure to serve under your chairmanship. I declare an interest as a foster carer. We are not specifically talking about foster care, but it is part of the wider

social-carelabour-marketfiscal-policy
863
13 May 2025 Carer’s Leave

That point has been mentioned a number of times in this debate, and we will certainly look at the research as it is produced. I have noted that the shadow Minister now supports paid carer’s leave, although he could not bring himself to support it during the passage of the Employment Rights Bill. I am aware that there h

social-carelabour-marketfiscal-policy
713
12 May 2025Product Regulation and Metrology Bill [Lords] (Second sitting)

I apologise—I had not realised. I will try to slow down. Clause 2 is a vital part of the Bill: it will ensure that the UK has a comprehensive framework for regulating products sold on its markets and provides the flexibility to recognise global standards and maintain the highest safety and quality requirements for cons

economy-jobstechnology
57
12 May 2025Product Regulation and Metrology Bill [Lords] (Second sitting)

Amendment 23 would prevent the naming in regulations of “relevant authorities”. That would render enforcement of the Bill impossible, so clearly it is not an amendment that we will accept. Local authority enforcement officers conduct the majority of product safety and metrology enforcement activities, and the Office fo

economy-jobstechnology
177
12 May 2025Product Regulation and Metrology Bill [Lords] (Second sitting)

If we were to limit ourselves to naming organisations in the Bill, we might not have sufficient flexibility in the future. I am trying to indicate the types of body that we would expect to enforce product safety regulations, as they do already. Amendment 24 would prevent regulations made under the Bill from creating pr

economy-jobstechnology
364
12 May 2025Product Regulation and Metrology Bill [Lords] (Second sitting)

I am beginning to wonder whether Opposition Members think that “Capricorn One” was a documentary rather than a work of fiction. We are really entering some quite interesting territory about what evil plots this Government have, which of course is not the case at all. Amendment 26 seeks to remove the ability to create o

economy-jobstechnology
427
← PreviousPage 24 of 56 · click a debate to open the transcript with this MP’s speeches highlightedNext →
Sources
SourceHansard · official report
MethodEach row is one contribution (intervention or speech). Word count from the official text.