The Westminster lensArchive · §02 Speeches · 744 contributions

Speeches by Whittingdale.

Every Hansard contribution by John Whittingdale this parliament, most recent first. Back to the MP page for the headline figures and analysed positions.

Showing 501520 of 744 contributions · most-recent first

← PreviousPage 26 of 38Next →
DateDebate & contributionWords
22 Apr 2025Foreign Affairs Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 488)

Can I interrupt you? You set out the argument quite clearly in your speech—

14
22 Apr 2025Foreign Affairs Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 488)

Can I come to what you described as one of your missions, which is to combat the weaponisation, I think you said, of international law?

25
22 Apr 2025Foreign Affairs Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 488)

Do you think that it is possible to reach an agreement in Gaza without having a clear path set out towards a two-state solution?

24
22 Apr 2025Foreign Affairs Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 488)

First of all, we share your wish to see the return of all the hostages and the priority that you attach to that. I also fully understand why Israel could not accept any continuation of Hamas involvement in the administration of Gaza or anywhere else. Looking at the day after, which you have talked about, and your sugge

150
22 Apr 2025Foreign Affairs Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 488)

I read your speech about the legal basis for settlements in the West Bank, in which you made the case that Israel’s borders were set in 1948 and that, in international law, that should still be the position. However, you also said that that was not the position as determined by the International Court of Justice, the I

88
22 Apr 2025Foreign Affairs Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 488)

I am afraid I cannot give you the precise date, but what you are talking about is exactly the case you put at that time, and I understand it. What I do not understand is that almost all international legal bodies take a different view. Why should that be, when you argue that the case, in legal terms, is very clear?

61
22 Apr 2025Foreign Affairs Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 488)

Can I interrupt you? You set out the argument quite clearly in your speech—

14
22 Apr 2025Foreign Affairs Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 488)

I read your speech about the legal basis for settlements in the West Bank, in which you made the case that Israel’s borders were set in 1948 and that, in international law, that should still be the position. However, you also said that that was not the position as determined by the International Court of Justice, the I

88
22 Apr 2025Foreign Affairs Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 488)

Can I come to what you described as one of your missions, which is to combat the weaponisation, I think you said, of international law?

25
22 Apr 2025Foreign Affairs Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 488)

Do you think that it is possible to reach an agreement in Gaza without having a clear path set out towards a two-state solution?

24
22 Apr 2025Foreign Affairs Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 488)

First of all, we share your wish to see the return of all the hostages and the priority that you attach to that. I also fully understand why Israel could not accept any continuation of Hamas involvement in the administration of Gaza or anywhere else. Looking at the day after, which you have talked about, and your sugge

150
22 Apr 2025Foreign Affairs Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 488)

I am afraid I cannot give you the precise date, but what you are talking about is exactly the case you put at that time, and I understand it. What I do not understand is that almost all international legal bodies take a different view. Why should that be, when you argue that the case, in legal terms, is very clear?

61
22 Apr 2025Foreign Affairs Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 488)

Can I interrupt you? You set out the argument quite clearly in your speech—

14
22 Apr 2025Foreign Affairs Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 488)

Can I come to what you described as one of your missions, which is to combat the weaponisation, I think you said, of international law?

25
22 Apr 2025Foreign Affairs Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 488)

Do you think that it is possible to reach an agreement in Gaza without having a clear path set out towards a two-state solution?

24
22 Apr 2025Foreign Affairs Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 488)

First of all, we share your wish to see the return of all the hostages and the priority that you attach to that. I also fully understand why Israel could not accept any continuation of Hamas involvement in the administration of Gaza or anywhere else. Looking at the day after, which you have talked about, and your sugge

150
21 Apr 2025 Ukraine Update

The Secretary of State rightly began his statement by condemning the Russian missile attack on Sumy on Palm Sunday, which killed civilians and children. However, he will be aware of Russian claims that this was a military target and that 60 Ukrainian military commanders were killed, as were NATO servicemen who were “in

defenceeconomy-jobs
79
2 Apr 2025Use of AI: Creative Industries

The Secretary of State will be aware of suggestions that the Government may offer concessions around AI regulation in a deal to reduce US tariffs. Will she assure the creative and news media sectors that any negotiations will not include an offer to weaken our copyright framework, which would be opposed by creative ind

technologyculture-community
62
2 Apr 2025Use of AI: Creative Industries

2. What discussions she has had with representatives of the creative industries on the use of AI.

technologyculture-community
17
1 Apr 2025Foreign Affairs Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 703)

You have described various forms of electoral malpractice, but do you have any direct evidence showing that it was being run by Russia?

23
← PreviousPage 26 of 38 · click a debate to open the transcript with this MP’s speeches highlightedNext →
Sources
SourceHansard · official report
MethodEach row is one contribution (intervention or speech). Word count from the official text.