Speeches by Grady.
Every Hansard contribution by John Grady this parliament, most recent first. Back to the MP page for the headline figures and analysed positions.
Showing 661–680 of 894 contributions · most-recent first
| Date | Debate & contribution | Words |
|---|---|---|
| 1 Apr 2025 | Treasury Committee — Oral Evidence (2025-04-01) “I think you explained earlier that the outcome of that would be higher borrowing costs for the UK Government.” | 19 |
| 1 Apr 2025 | Treasury Committee — Oral Evidence (2025-04-01) “I want to come back to the confidence in sticking to fiscal rules. Richard Hughes of the OBR made an interesting comment last week: “This Spring Statement breaks a historical pattern of asymmetric policy responses to forecast changes—in which windfalls were generally spent but shortfalls were not fully made up.” Dr Sal…” | 72 |
| 1 Apr 2025 | Treasury Committee — Oral Evidence (2025-04-01) “If a family has just bought a house in Mount Vernon in my seat, is it in their best interests, from the point of view of their mortgage rates, that the Chancellor of the Exchequer does not radically increase borrowing?” | 40 |
| 1 Apr 2025 | Treasury Committee — Oral Evidence (2025-04-01) “The other thing that some people are saying is that the Government should just increase borrowing. Professor Miles, what would be the risks of increasing borrowing and an associated change in the Chancellor’s rules?” | 34 |
| 1 Apr 2025 | Treasury Committee — Oral Evidence (2025-04-01) “If I have this right, Government borrowing costs increasing to, for example, 5% or 5.5% would feed through to the public finances quite significantly, because we have a large amount of debt—almost 100% of GDP, so we are quite unlike Germany. Additionally, however, because of the way in which people price private sector…” | 101 |
| 26 Mar 2025 | Spring Statement “Reckless management of public finances leads to higher costs of Government borrowing. As any economist will say, that increases the cost of capital across the British economy, putting at risk and increasing the cost of the essential investments in housing and infrastructure that my constituents desperately need. Does m…” economy-jobsdefencehousing | 86 |
| 25 Mar 2025 | Treasury Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 417) “It also follows, because the FCA is full of human beings, that that judgment may sometimes turn out to be less than ideal in retrospect and that some firms that were not supervised intensively could have done with a bit more intensive supervision. It also follows that the FCA does not guarantee that any firm is well ru…” | 85 |
| 25 Mar 2025 | Treasury Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 417) “People rely on this sector more than ever, so trust in it is critical. This is maybe a question for Mr Alder. Obviously, we have the review that we have just been discussing. If you look at the investment universe, including things like crypto, do you think much more is needed beyond that review to secure good advice a…” | 62 |
| 25 Mar 2025 | Treasury Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 417) “Crypto, and just more generally. I am mindful of time, so we should keep the responses short, please.” | 18 |
| 25 Mar 2025 | Treasury Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 417) “A brief comment, please.” | 4 |
| 25 Mar 2025 | Treasury Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 417) “That illustrates an interesting point, because you are looking at regulating this further. This is maybe a question for Ms Howard, and again please a nice short answer, because time is marching on. Do you think that consumers understand the precise role of the FCA? Just because a business is authorised by the FCA, for …” | 82 |
| 25 Mar 2025 | Treasury Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 417) “A final question from me on this chapter, before we move on. We have got the motor finance case, we have got the Collateral case, Safe Hands, and potential issues with BNPL. That is in a lower-risk environment. As we go on this dash for growth, would more of these cases fall within a tolerable or acceptable level of ha…” | 66 |
| 25 Mar 2025 | Treasury Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 417) “But it is a good answer.” | 6 |
| 25 Mar 2025 | Treasury Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 417) “I am sorry, Mr Alder; I do not want to interrupt, but we might come back to Safe Hands. We have read the correspondence, which is very helpful. The question I am getting at is more, if you look at it from the point of view of, not a Financial Times reader, but someone like me, sitting in Shettleston on a Friday night, …” | 126 |
| 25 Mar 2025 | Treasury Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 417) “That is good. Turning quickly to compensation, I do not want to get into the detail of these cases, but in the Collateral case the FCA has said that it could have done better, in simple terms. For Safe Hands there is no compensation whatsoever. That low level of compensation for Collateral and no compensation for Safe …” | 72 |
| 25 Mar 2025 | Treasury Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 417) “Have you got any data on consumer understanding of what all this means?” | 13 |
| 25 Mar 2025 | Treasury Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 417) “No, just more generally, just an investor in Shettleston saving for their pension or their grandkids.” | 16 |
| 25 Mar 2025 | Treasury Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 417) “From the point of view of a consumer in Shettleston, with that proportionality and risk-based approach, it must follow that some firms are monitored intensively and some firms not at all, or to a limited extent.” | 36 |
| 25 Mar 2025 | Treasury Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 417) “So the FCA may not be supervising that firm in any great detail at all?” | 15 |
| 25 Mar 2025 | Treasury Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 417) “The fact that I have the FCA label on my website does not mean that the FCA is supervising the firm intensively, does it?” | 24 |