The Westminster lensArchive · §02 Speeches · 1,491 contributions

Speeches by Glen.

Every Hansard contribution by John Glen this parliament, most recent first. Back to the MP page for the headline figures and analysed positions.

Showing 1,4211,440 of 1,491 contributions · most-recent first

← PreviousPage 72 of 75Next →
DateDebate & contributionWords
5 Nov 2024Treasury Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 320)

Yael, could I turn to you and Mr Brewer on the OBR’s assessment of the lags in terms of the effect of this public investment? One of the frustrations from the Government’s point of view is that they are making all this investment, but there is a lag before it can be accounted for. How do you think about the OBR’s asses

97
5 Nov 2024Treasury Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 320)

We did know from your biog. Thanks for telling us.

10
5 Nov 2024Treasury Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 320)

Can we turn to public investment? I want to ask some questions about the OBR and the modelling of public investment beyond the immediate period. Perhaps I could start with Mr King. What do you think about the OBR’s assessments at 10 and 50 years? The core narrative of the Government is that we are fixing the foundation

120
5 Nov 2024Treasury Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 320)

I would like to turn to the dynamics with the Treasury. I must declare an interest. Until a year ago I was Chief Secretary and before that I had some other involvement in the Treasury. Clearly, as I said at the start in my first set of questions, you are set up to give a dispassionate assessment of what is true, and yo

100
5 Nov 2024Treasury Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 320)

In 2023. I cannot account for the interval between that and the fiscal event. However, having worked with those departmental spending teams week in, week out, I cannot see how their demeanour and approach to doing their job would have changed in those four months. That is why it is quite confusing that we have got to t

59
5 Nov 2024Treasury Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 320)

I was there until 12 November.

6
5 Nov 2024Treasury Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 320)

What concerns me is that, given that the rhythm of activity was routine and you had no reason to believe that there would be a change in the way that Treasury officials would interact with you, at the time of that fiscal event in March/April the OBR never said anything about its concerns over a material change in the d

124
5 Nov 2024Treasury Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 320)

I mean the 73% could be seen as misleading because it includes small holdings that are not, for meaningful purposes, actual farms.

22
5 Nov 2024Treasury Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 320)

Do you know anything about the baseline? It is asserted that 73% will not be in scope of this. If the baseline is inflated by, essentially, a house with three acres that is not really a farm, can you say anything about that assessment?

44
5 Nov 2024Treasury Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 320)

Have you done any distribution analysis of where that money is from—how many people? Is it 2,000 estates that will yield the £520 million over the forecast period?

28
5 Nov 2024Treasury Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 320)

Am I allowed to ask you, “If you were asked”? If I asked you to apply a higher threshold, what effect would that have on revenues? Obviously, it is something that many stakeholders in the industry are looking at in the context of all the other pressures they face. What material impact does that have? If you are not all

68
5 Nov 2024Treasury Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 320)

I just want to ask about the tax side of things. There has been a lot of controversy about the agricultural property relief, and that will be ongoing. Some of that is outside your realm. Were you asked to do any different scenarios around the threshold changes? What did they give in terms of projections of different sa

58
5 Nov 2024Treasury Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 320)

I just want to ask one question about this productivity issue and productivity savings. Most Government Departments assert, I think, 2% per Department and stress the rigidity of that. What is your experience of the delivery of that and any optimism bias in that assertion? It seems intuitively that, with AI and differen

85
5 Nov 2024Treasury Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 320)

If I may, as the Minister who did that, we concluded it the day before the election was called. It was impossible—

22
5 Nov 2024Treasury Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 320)

It is just that the problem we have, and that we are left with—I will finish on this question—is that the assertion is made by the Government that there was a sort of wilful restriction on what was shared with you. My impression, working through, I think, seven fiscal events, was that there was a formal iterative proce

90
5 Nov 2024Treasury Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 320)

But don’t you think it is highly regrettable that over the last few months you have been sucked into this political debate about a black hole? Do you think that can be avoided in future?

35
5 Nov 2024Treasury Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 320)

Can I ask you one other thing about the interaction with the Treasury? I recall, in previous fiscal events, there was an iterative process of discussion—for example, around the therapeutic effect, if you like, of the childcare policy. During that conversation, the impact on jobs and so on worked through. My assumption

158
5 Nov 2024Treasury Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 320)

Yes, we will.

3
5 Nov 2024Treasury Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 320)

The point I am making is that as a Minister one receives figures from Treasury officials and is aware of those tensions. The interaction between you, your officials, and Treasury officials is outwith the relationship between Ministers. This is, essentially, as you have described, a dysfunction in the smoothness of the

72
5 Nov 2024Treasury Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 320)

I am just trying to establish—I have a lot of respect for the dynamic between the Treasury and the OBR: what I am trying to get at is how we got into a situation where an assertion is made on 29 July about a black hole, which I acknowledge is an ongoing tension that would crystallise at a fiscal event, through the proc

92
← PreviousPage 72 of 75 · click a debate to open the transcript with this MP’s speeches highlightedNext →
Sources
SourceHansard · official report
MethodEach row is one contribution (intervention or speech). Word count from the official text.