The Westminster lensArchive · §02 Speeches · 1,699 contributions

Speeches by Glen.

Every Hansard contribution by John Glen this parliament, most recent first. Back to the MP page for the headline figures and analysed positions.

Showing 241260 of 1,699 contributions · most-recent first

← PreviousPage 13 of 85Next →
DateDebate & contributionWords
2 Jun 2026Treasury Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 14)

But you get the conception.

5
2 Jun 2026Treasury Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 14)

But we heard in the previous session that other countries provide a very different offer at university. In France, you see more people going to university near where they live, which removes the living costs, and the degree of wraparound care and welfare is different. Would that be an area where you could find ways of

90
2 Jun 2026Treasury Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 14)

But not decreasing others?

4
2 Jun 2026Treasury Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 14)

Respectfully, all of that is true but, as Vivienne Stern said in her evidence, you have vast differences in the cost of providing these courses and, I am afraid, a finite budget. How do you reconcile that? I understand that you do not want to identify a specific course at a specific institution, but do you think that t

94
2 Jun 2026Treasury Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 14)

Most usually do.

3
2 Jun 2026Treasury Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 14)

Can I just put to you what Sir Philip Augar, whom we had here earlier, said in his review? He concluded: “Generous and undirected funding has led to an oversupply of some courses at great cost to the taxpayer and a corresponding undersupply of graduates in strategically important sectors.” How do you respond to the cla

80
2 Jun 2026Treasury Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 14)

That is fine.

3
2 Jun 2026Treasury Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 14)

No, I am not asking for a simple “gotcha” thing. Over the last 20 or 25 years, we have seen vastly higher numbers of people go to university, and therefore we have seen the provision that the state has to make for it increase. You probably heard in the earlier panel how that money is distributed. Do you have a view abo

73
2 Jun 2026Treasury Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 14)

I want to move on to the way we fund universities overall. It is important we act responsibly on this Committee. We cannot recommend spending more on everything without recognising there are consequences. If you can, I would like you to address where the UK sits, compared with comparator economies, in terms of the amou

105
2 Jun 2026Treasury Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 14)

For plan 2?

3
1 Jun 2026Topical Questions

Having recently visited Wiltshire cadets in Old Sarum, I very much welcome what the Minister said about National Cadet Week. Will she ensure that all schools, particularly those in Pride in Place areas, such as the one in Salisbury, are made aware of the transformational opportunities of attending the cadets? That will

defenceeconomy-jobslabour-market
68
20 May 2026Treasury Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 7)

I want to turn to the growth outlook. Before I ask my question, I think one of the things that people will have noticed is the great amount of volatility in the predictions and the numbers. For March, I think the GDP figure from the ONS was an expansion of 0.3% but, as has been reported, Reuters polled economists and a

105
20 May 2026Treasury Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 7)

When we look at this situation—that we have the lowest fiscal headroom among the G7, at a time when gilts are at their highest since 1998—it feels like we are in quite a vulnerable position if you look at the two key drivers. What can you say about the best-case scenario for underlying GDP growth up to, say, 2030, give

67
20 May 2026Treasury Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 7)

What do we do about it then? The country sees the growth figures, for which we as politicians generate great big headlines, one way or the other, but they seem pretty meaningless, because they are often restated. If they had been true to what they actually were on the restatement, they would not have generated anything

76
20 May 2026Treasury Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 7)

That just smooths it, so this notion that somehow we are 0.1% higher than other countries in the G7 is—

20
20 May 2026Treasury Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 7)

Dr Dhingra, is there anything you would like to say on this subject?

13
20 May 2026Treasury Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 7)

That has been a pattern for a few years—

9
20 May 2026Treasury Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 7)

On that point—this is my last question—we are often told that we are in a much weaker position in terms of our energy costs, but in terms of AI, as a strength and momentum for the economy, how would you characterise where we stand relative to other economies in the G7?

51
20 May 2026Treasury Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 7)

Can you be optimistic about our relative position, notwithstanding the US’s leadership?

12
20 May 2026Treasury Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 7)

You mean that outside of financial services is where the sluggishness exists.

12
← PreviousPage 13 of 85 · click a debate to open the transcript with this MP’s speeches highlightedNext →
Sources
SourceHansard · official report
MethodEach row is one contribution (intervention or speech). Word count from the official text.