The Westminster lensArchive · §02 Speeches · 681 contributions

Speeches by Brown-Fuller.

Every Hansard contribution by Jess Brown-Fuller this parliament, most recent first. Back to the MP page for the headline figures and analysed positions.

Showing 261280 of 681 contributions · most-recent first

← PreviousPage 14 of 35Next →
DateDebate & contributionWords
21 Apr 2026Courts and Tribunals Bill (Eighth sitting)

Because of that cocktail of measures—extending sentencing powers in the magistrates, not addressing the disparity in legal aid between the two courts and restricting the right to appeal—clause 6 should not stand part of the Bill, and I will be voting against it.

crimesocial-care
43
21 Apr 2026Courts and Tribunals Bill (Eighth sitting)

crimesocial-care
0
21 Apr 2026Courts and Tribunals Bill (Eighth sitting)

The latest open caseload volume roughly equates to around three months of disposals, based on latest disposal levels and not factoring in any receipts during that period. Since the end of 2021, single justice procedures have tended to make up about 50% of the open magistrates court caseload. Single justice procedure di

crimesocial-care
97
21 Apr 2026Courts and Tribunals Bill (Eighth sitting)

I know the Government have been embarking on a big recruitment drive, but they also have a retention issue at the other end. They are bringing in magistrates at one end but losing them at the other. Removing the power of defendants to elect, plus the change in sentencing powers, will increase the workload of the magist

crimesocial-care
101
21 Apr 2026Courts and Tribunals Bill (Eighth sitting)

The same could be said for the Crown court. We would not charge someone and want to see them in a Crown court the next day. There is a separate conversation to be had about what the figure should be, with increasing cases. In 2021, the MOJ’s assessment in its spending review was that it would like the backlog to go fro

crimesocial-care
148
21 Apr 2026Courts and Tribunals Bill (Eighth sitting)

Does the hon. Lady agree with His Honour Geoffrey Rivlin KC, who argued that jury trials could actually impose discipline in complex fraud cases, whereas in a judge-only trial there is no incentive to get on and hear all the evidence? He also said that in such cases, juries decide issues of dishonesty and facts that ar

crimesocial-care
77
21 Apr 2026Courts and Tribunals Bill (Eighth sitting)

In the last couple of weeks, there have been press reports about a particular case that was charged in 2019. I will not go into that because it is going to reopen, but clause 4 would mean, for example, that somebody who has been abusing and defrauding the elderly—perhaps many different elderly people—over many years an

crimesocial-care
122
21 Apr 2026Courts and Tribunals Bill (Eighth sitting)

I thank the hon. Member for his point; he characterises me very well as being generous. I would also argue that the scope is expanded significantly if one of the offences that a defendant is charged with is fraud, money laundering or any of the offences that sit in that category. There can be 10 charges against a defen

crimesocial-care
482
21 Apr 2026Courts and Tribunals Bill (Eighth sitting)

I will speak against the inclusion of clause 4. It inserts part 6A in the Criminal Justice Act 2003, which will allow complex or lengthy cases to be tried without a jury. My main opposition to the clause is that it is a pointless exercise by the Government that will in no way affect the backlog. The Government’s own im

crimesocial-care
288
20 Apr 2026Victims and Courts Bill

We in the Liberal Democrats, including my friend the learned Lord Marks in the other place, were concerned about the provisions in clause 12 that would give the Government power to limit cost reimbursement. We have argued that there is a risk that organisations will be put off presenting cases if they cannot recover th

crime
164
20 Apr 2026Victims and Courts Bill

I begin by thanking Members from across both Chambers for their work in getting this legislation to where it is today. I especially thank the Government for their engagement with me and my colleagues in the Lords, in particular the Minister, who I have met multiple times to discuss various issues in the Bill. A key cor

crime
506
20 Apr 2026Victims and Courts Bill

I am pleased to hear that the Minister will be attending because I know that the organisers were keen to engage with her so that they can continue to see progress. I turn now to Lords amendments 5B, 5C, 5D, 5E, 5F, 6B and 6C, all of which impact the unduly lenient scheme. Again, I thank Baroness Brinton in the other pl

crime
476
20 Apr 2026Maternity Commissioner

The hon. and learned Gentleman is making an important point about the disparity in the guidance. If there is someone at the top of an NHS trust who is passionate about maternity care, that is more likely to trickle down, but that is not the same in every trust, and therefore we can end up with a postcode lottery. In Ch

healthsocial-care
137
16 Apr 2026Courts and Tribunals Bill (Fifth sitting)

The hon. Lady is making an excellent point about the complexity of cases changing throughout. A legal professional recently shared with me the story of what was an assault case, but the victim passed away during the trial, so they are now dealing with hearing evidence of potential brain trauma injury. Does the hon. Lad

crime
78
16 Apr 2026Courts and Tribunals Bill (Fifth sitting)

We heard oral evidence from Doug Downey, who talked about the Canadian system. He also talked about how the right to elect is a protected characteristic of their justice system. The difference is that they have the right to elect a judge-alone trial. Did the Minister explore the option of maintaining the right to elect

crime
79
16 Apr 2026Courts and Tribunals Bill (Sixth sitting)

Although I have proposed the removal of clause 3 in its entirety—we will come to the arguments for that later in proceedings—I will speak to amendment 12, tabled in my name, which seeks to remove subsections (2) to (4) of the clause. Those subsections provide that cases can be assigned to be heard by a judge alone, eve

crimefiscal-policy
73
16 Apr 2026Courts and Tribunals Bill (Sixth sitting)

I will speak to amendment 18, tabled in my name, which seeks to ensure that a defendant has the right to appeal against a judge’s decision to allocate a case for trial by judge alone, whether because of the likely sentence length or because the case is assessed to be complex or lengthy. I will also be supporting amendm

crimefiscal-policy
435
16 Apr 2026Courts and Tribunals Bill (Sixth sitting)

I accept that it might be a mischaracterisation to describe it as rough justice, but does the Minister agree that in this case it will be summary justice, which by its very definition is rougher around the edges, because it is summary?

crimefiscal-policy
42
16 Apr 2026Courts and Tribunals Bill (Sixth sitting)

I appreciate the opportunity to come back on that. That poses another question: if judge-only trials are going to take the exact same amount of time, how will this speed up the court backlog?

crimefiscal-policy
34
16 Apr 2026Courts and Tribunals Bill (Sixth sitting)

I beg to move amendment 19, in clause 3, page 6, line 25, at end insert— “(4A) A trial conducted without a jury will be heard by one judge and two magistrates.” This amendment implements the recommendation of the Independent Review of the Criminal Courts to have cases heard in the Crown Court Bench Division by a judge

crimefiscal-policy
603
← PreviousPage 14 of 35 · click a debate to open the transcript with this MP’s speeches highlightedNext →
Sources
SourceHansard · official report
MethodEach row is one contribution (intervention or speech). Word count from the official text.