The Westminster lensArchive · §02 Speeches · 1,163 contributions

Speeches by Benn.

Every Hansard contribution by Hilary Benn this parliament, most recent first. Back to the MP page for the headline figures and analysed positions.

Showing 161180 of 1,163 contributions · most-recent first

← PreviousPage 9 of 59Next →
DateDebate & contributionWords
3 Jun 2026Replacing the Northern Ireland Troubles (Legacy and Reconciliation) Act 2023

I have consulted and met a wide range of people. I have seen the amendment that has been tabled, which we will come to when the Bill is in Committee, but the hon. Gentleman will be aware that there is already provision in the Bill for protection from repeated investigations unless the commission regards them as essenti

defencecrimeculture-community
82
3 Jun 2026Replacing the Northern Ireland Troubles (Legacy and Reconciliation) Act 2023

We are looking at amendments to improve the process for families, to further safeguard our Operation Banner veterans and to ensure oversight of how the protections work. We will make it clear that there is no equivalence, and never was, between the actions of terrorists and the conduct of our armed forces and the polic

defencecrimeculture-community
109
3 Jun 2026Replacing the Northern Ireland Troubles (Legacy and Reconciliation) Act 2023

As my hon. Friend the Chair of the Select Committee knows only too well, responsibility for national security ultimately rests with Ministers, and the Dillon and the Thompson judgments confirmed that. As I have already indicated, I have proposed changes to the disclosure provisions in the Bill, including requiring the

defencecrimeculture-community
92
3 Jun 2026Replacing the Northern Ireland Troubles (Legacy and Reconciliation) Act 2023

I have indeed seen the reports to which the hon. Gentleman has referred. As I have explained, one purpose of the troubles Bill is to facilitate co-operation with the Irish authorities in relation to all these matters. We cannot undo the past, but what we can do is provide information for those whose lives were lost as

defencecrimeculture-community
84
3 Jun 2026Replacing the Northern Ireland Troubles (Legacy and Reconciliation) Act 2023

Since the hon. Gentleman has raised the matter directly with me, I undertake to him—and to the House—to raise it with the Irish authorities, because they will have seen the exchange that he and I have just had.

defencecrimeculture-community
38
3 Jun 2026Replacing the Northern Ireland Troubles (Legacy and Reconciliation) Act 2023

The responsibility is held jointly with the independent commission established under the legislation put in place by the last Government. Some of the things that have been uncovered are evidence of why we need to reform the way in which the commission works, which is what the troubles Bill will seek to do. We have a jo

defencecrimeculture-community
127
3 Jun 2026Supreme Court Dillon Judgment: Policy Implications

Before answering, I pay tribute to Sir Desmond Rea who died recently. He played an important role in the peace process in Northern Ireland, particularly through the transformation of policing as the first chair of the Northern Ireland Policing Board. I am sure the whole House will join me in sending condolences to his

defencecrimeother
104
3 Jun 2026Supreme Court Dillon Judgment: Policy Implications

I agree with my hon. Friend that seeking to give immunity to terrorists who committed the most terrible crimes, including the killing of police officers, soldiers and many members of the public, was profoundly wrong. It is also wrong in principle. On the remedial order, now that we have the Dillon judgment we will be b

defencecrimeother
64
3 Jun 2026Supreme Court Dillon Judgment: Policy Implications

I do indeed agree with my hon. Friend—that is exactly what the troubles Bill will do. It is essential to build confidence across all communities, which the legacy Act failed to do, to put in place protections for our veterans and to enable all families who are seeking answers to request information through a reformed l

defencecrimeother
57
3 Jun 2026Supreme Court Dillon Judgment: Policy Implications

I ask my hon. Friend to pass on my thanks and, I am sure, the thanks of the whole House for his father’s service. He and all those who served deserve our eternal gratitude. As my hon. Friend knows, the number of service personnel convicted of troubles-related offences was very small—only one in the last 28 years—wherea

defencecrimeother
99
3 Jun 2026Supreme Court Dillon Judgment: Policy Implications

I will certainly join the hon. Member in expressing those thanks to all those who served with such distinction in Northern Ireland during the troubles to keep people safe. The Dillon judgment has provided extremely important clarity about the correct interpretation of the Windsor framework, as I said a moment ago. It a

defencecrimeother
81
3 Jun 2026Supreme Court Dillon Judgment: Policy Implications

That is indeed what the Supreme Court found in that particular important case. The Equality Act 2010 applies in only limited ways in Northern Ireland, as the hon. and learned Member knows. I agree with him on his first point. The Government took the appeal because they felt that the interpretation of the Windsor framew

defencecrimeother
97
3 Jun 2026Supreme Court Dillon Judgment: Policy Implications

As I have said from the Dispatch Box many times before, the courts had previously found that the ICRIR was independent. The Supreme Court has dealt with the two particular issues identified by the Court of Appeal in Northern Ireland. I have already indicated to the House that the Government propose to make amendments t

defencecrimeother
129
3 Jun 2026Supreme Court Dillon Judgment: Policy Implications

As I have said to the right hon. Gentleman a number of times before, the Government’s view, which is reinforced by the Dillon judgment, is that the legislation that we are bringing forward, combined with the judgment, means that there is no basis for the inter-state case; but it is a matter for the Irish Government to

defencecrimeother
141
14 May 2026Supreme Court Dillon Judgment

I do not agree with the hon. Member that we should leave the European convention on human rights, because it provides protections for all of us as citizens. The point I was seeking to address—and I thought it was very important to bring clarity to the House in relation to immunity and whether the appeal had been withdr

defencecrimeother
200
14 May 2026Supreme Court Dillon Judgment

The hon. Member raises an extremely important point. As I am sure she is aware, our troubles Bill leaves in place part 4 of the legacy Act. Not everything in the 2023 Act was wrong, and that part deals with memorialisation and digitisation of records. I agree with the hon. Member that it is not either/or; these things

defencecrimeother
178
14 May 2026Supreme Court Dillon Judgment

I quite understand why the hon. Gentleman makes that point, and I thank him for his service on behalf of our country. It is right and proper that it is the House of Commons that sees the detail of the amendments first, and I give the House that commitment. In addition to what is in the troubles Bill—the hon. Gentleman

defencecrimeother
215
14 May 2026Supreme Court Dillon Judgment

I have the greatest respect for the hon. Gentleman, but I do not accept his characterisation or that it is right to accuse the courts of weaponising anything. The courts looked at the case before them and reached a judgment, but the Supreme Court is the highest court in the land and, in the Government’s view, its inter

defencecrimeother
145
14 May 2026Supreme Court Dillon Judgment

The estimates are that between 25,000 and 35,000 paramilitaries were convicted for offences, including murder, bombings and other things, during the course of the troubles. There were four soldiers convicted of troubles-related offences during that time, one of whom was freed on appeal. Since the Good Friday agreement,

defencecrimeother
152
14 May 2026Supreme Court Dillon Judgment

I am grateful to the hon. Member for his comments, not least because of his service. As he will know, we have been engaged in very close discussion and consultation with many organisations representing veterans. The honest answer to his question is that people will make a judgment when they see the detail of the amendm

defencecrimeother
194
← PreviousPage 9 of 59 · click a debate to open the transcript with this MP’s speeches highlightedNext →
Sources
SourceHansard · official report
MethodEach row is one contribution (intervention or speech). Word count from the official text.