The Westminster lensArchive · §02 Speeches · 1,005 contributions

Speeches by Benn.

Every Hansard contribution by Hilary Benn this parliament, most recent first. Back to the MP page for the headline figures and analysed positions.

Showing 321340 of 1,005 contributions · most-recent first

← PreviousPage 17 of 51Next →
DateDebate & contributionWords
18 Nov 2025 Northern Ireland Troubles Bill

My hon. Friend raises an extremely important point. It is for the simple reason that the commission has the power to see all the information and evidence—everything. It is already investigating the Guildford pub bombings, the M62 coach bombing, and the Kingsmill massacre, and I hope that others—

defenceother
48
18 Nov 2025 Northern Ireland Troubles Bill

I will make progress. There are those who have claimed, wrongly, that this legislation will somehow lead to a huge increase in prosecutions of veterans, or that it is only veterans who have been prosecuted in recent years, or that on-the-run letters have given IRA members an amnesty—an issue we have discussed in the Ch

defenceother
835
18 Nov 2025 Northern Ireland Troubles Bill

I have given the House a very clear assurance on this point. I point out to the hon. Gentleman that nowhere in the legacy Act, which is the previous Government’s legislation, is there such a prohibition. Indeed, nowhere in that legislation does the word “veterans” appear.

defenceother
46
13 Nov 2025 Northern Ireland Troubles Legacy

I congratulate the right hon. Member for Goole and Pocklington (David Davis) on having secured this debate. The legacy of the troubles cast a long, dark shadow over the lives of so many people in Northern Ireland and across the United Kingdom, including on some of those the right hon. Gentleman mentioned, and there are

defencecrime
638
13 Nov 2025 Northern Ireland Troubles Legacy

He is.

defencecrime
2
3 Nov 2025“Soldier F” Trial Verdict

As I say, the legacy Act’s offer of immunity in return for statements that the legacy commission regarded as truthful and credible could have given immunity to terrorists. That is why the immunity that the last Government sought to put in place was rejected by victims’ and survivors’ groups in Northern Ireland, was opp

defencecrimesocial-care
176
3 Nov 2025“Soldier F” Trial Verdict

I am grateful to the hon. Member for referring to the Saville inquiry. That long-running inquiry finally brought some truth and justice, in the eyes of families of the 13 people shot dead, and led the former Prime Minister to make his apology. The hon. Member is right when he says that, given the passage of time, it is

defencecrimesocial-care
101
3 Nov 2025“Soldier F” Trial Verdict

The trial of Soldier F concluded on 23 October with a not guilty verdict. The Ministry of Defence rightly provided him with legal and pastoral support. I and the Secretary of State for Defence have, of course, noted the judgment, but I do not think it appropriate to be drawn on the particulars of these independent lega

defencecrimesocial-care
418
3 Nov 2025“Soldier F” Trial Verdict

All those families, including military families, are at the centre of what we seek to do. What are the Government trying to achieve? We are trying to create a legacy system that more people in Northern Ireland can have confidence in. The last legacy Act failed to command sufficient confidence from the people in Norther

defencecrimesocial-care
125
3 Nov 2025“Soldier F” Trial Verdict

I agree with what the hon. Gentleman says and his characterisation of the immunity provisions in the legacy Act. Nick Pope, the chair of the Confederation of Service Charities, said that the confederation welcomes “the development of the safeguards that have been put in place to offer protection to those within the arm

defencecrimesocial-care
106
3 Nov 2025“Soldier F” Trial Verdict

Having promised the House in two statements since the Government were elected in July 2024 that I would bring forward proposals, I did so when the Government published the Bill on 14 October. Since then, I have met political parties and organisations representing victims and survivors, and this week I will again meet t

defencecrimesocial-care
143
3 Nov 2025“Soldier F” Trial Verdict

I gently say to the hon. Gentleman that I do not accept the characterisation he used at the end of his question. This is not a politically correct process; this is about trying to find a way forward for those families. The honest answer to the fair point that he raises is that each family deals with the loss of their l

defencecrimesocial-care
225
3 Nov 2025“Soldier F” Trial Verdict

I share my hon. Friend’s concern about what happened as a result of the legacy Act, but I welcome that two of the cases she mentioned—the M62 coach bombing and Warrenpoint—are currently being investigated by the Independent Commission for Reconciliation and Information Recovery, because members of their families have c

defencecrimesocial-care
86
3 Nov 2025“Soldier F” Trial Verdict

I apologise if I have got this wrong, but I do not remember using the word “equivalence”. What I said was that independent prosecutors would make decisions on the basis of the evidence that they had before them. The current legacy commission is able to refer cases for potential prosecution, and the new legacy commissio

defencecrimesocial-care
142
3 Nov 2025“Soldier F” Trial Verdict

I agree with the hon. Member that 90% of those who were killed during the troubles were killed by paramilitary terrorists, which is why the vast majority of those who have been prosecuted and convicted have been paramilitary terrorists. However, I do not agree with her when she uses the phrase “vexatious prosecutions”.

defencecrimesocial-care
127
3 Nov 2025“Soldier F” Trial Verdict

It is a fundamental principle of our legal system that we accept the verdicts of the courts, even if we may not agree with them. The hon. and learned Gentleman is a distinguished lawyer, and he expresses his views regarding the basis of that prosecution. The only point that I am making is that that decision is made by

defencecrimesocial-care
66
3 Nov 2025“Soldier F” Trial Verdict

I would cite to the right hon. Gentleman the case of Mr John Downey, to whom I have referred in the House before. He received one of those letters, and as a result his trial for the Hyde Park bombings was halted by the judge, but the public record will show that Mr Downey is currently awaiting trial for two murders com

defencecrimesocial-care
84
3 Nov 2025“Soldier F” Trial Verdict

The legacy Act offered a false promise of immunity. It was found to be incompatible with our obligations, and it had no support in Northern Ireland. At some point, Opposition Members must recognise that it had no support there. How can Northern Ireland move forward if the basis of the last Government’s legislation lack

defencecrimesocial-care
105
3 Nov 2025“Soldier F” Trial Verdict

I have already expressed the Government’s thanks in my answer to the hon. Member for Brentwood and Ongar (Alex Burghart), and I think those sentiments are felt right across the House.

defencecrimesocial-care
31
3 Nov 2025“Soldier F” Trial Verdict

The protections were put in place for veterans after consulting veterans, and they are not unimportant: the ability to stay at home and give evidence; the protection from repeated investigations; and the right to seek immunity in a hearing of the commission—people already have the right to seek that in a coroner’s cour

defencecrimesocial-care
130
← PreviousPage 17 of 51 · click a debate to open the transcript with this MP’s speeches highlightedNext →
Sources
SourceHansard · official report
MethodEach row is one contribution (intervention or speech). Word count from the official text.