The Westminster lensArchive · §02 Speeches · 558 contributions

Speeches by Dollimore.

Every Hansard contribution by Helena Dollimore this parliament, most recent first. Back to the MP page for the headline figures and analysed positions.

Showing 141160 of 558 contributions · most-recent first

← PreviousPage 8 of 28Next →
DateDebate & contributionWords
15 Jul 2025Environment, Food and Rural Affairs Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 588)

The people who live outside London will probably feel they are quite important and essential to fix too.

18
15 Jul 2025Environment, Food and Rural Affairs Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 588)

You are asking for all water companies to be let off fines, effectively.

13
15 Jul 2025Environment, Food and Rural Affairs Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 588)

Just to be really clear, on behalf of your creditors, you are asking to be let off the penalties for not doing the investments you have promised you will do as part of price reviews. How is that going to fix the problem?

43
15 Jul 2025Environment, Food and Rural Affairs Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 588)

You have spoken about that, and that will be in your submissions to the Independent Water Commission.

17
15 Jul 2025Environment, Food and Rural Affairs Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 588)

You have said in your accounts that were published this morning that you expect it will take 10 years to fix sewage dumping in the Thames. Are you asking to be let off the hook for 10 years as part of this regulatory reset?

44
15 Jul 2025Environment, Food and Rural Affairs Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 588)

But can you answer the question, Adrian? You have said in your accounts today you think this will take 10 years to fix. Is it therefore correct to say that Thames is lobbying Ofwat and the Government to be let off fines for 10 years?

45
15 Jul 2025Environment, Food and Rural Affairs Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 588)

If you have not taken that decision as a board, why are you lobbying the Government for that as Thames Water?

21
15 Jul 2025Environment, Food and Rural Affairs Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 588)

It was a bid that you had moved heaven and earth to pave the way for, so how did you feel in that moment? You had let it proceed on an exclusive basis, and you have found yourself in an extremely uncomfortable position in front of this Committee. How did you feel when KKR pulled out?

56
15 Jul 2025Environment, Food and Rural Affairs Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 588)

So is it the creditors who are lobbying the Government?

10
15 Jul 2025Environment, Food and Rural Affairs Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 588)

You are reacting to that now, but had you conducted your own undertaking on 4 November to have discussions with Ofwat about the legality of the proposed scheme, it is quite clear that it would have expressed the view that the Secretary of State expressed to us here, and the 30 April payment probably would not have gone

62
9 Jul 2025 Business of the House

The return of the Bayeux tapestry to this country for the first time in almost 1,000 years is a triumph for Britain. The tapestry quite literally wove Hastings and 1066 Country into our national history, but while we are often at the centre of historical events, we have not always felt the benefits, and our area is in

healtheconomy-jobseducation
162
8 Jul 2025Environment, Food and Rural Affairs Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 929)

You touched on sachets there, which are a huge source of plastic pollution. They are perhaps not as well known in the UK, because they are used more often in the global south and cause huge pollution, particularly in the oceans. Is that something that you hope to see a clear ban on in the plastics treaty and what do yo

68
8 Jul 2025Environment, Food and Rural Affairs Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 929)

Allison, Richard, did you want to add anything on those points?

11
8 Jul 2025Environment, Food and Rural Affairs Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 929)

It is important because it sets the context in which these discussions are taking place and the context in which you, as scientists, are operating. You have talked about the need to have truly independent science available to the decision makers, so it is relevant in that context, but I can feel that you do not want to

126
8 Jul 2025Environment, Food and Rural Affairs Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 929)

We will come on a bit more to product design later in the questioning. On the point that you made, Richard, noting what the Chair said, about having threats against you and legal letters, without referencing who those might have come from, is that something you have experienced a lot as a scientist working in this area

57
8 Jul 2025Environment, Food and Rural Affairs Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 929)

What is the mainstream scientific consensus on these chemicals of concern and the impact that they have on humans?

19
8 Jul 2025Environment, Food and Rural Affairs Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 929)

What is the mainstream scientific consensus on these chemicals of concern and the impact that they have on humans?

19
8 Jul 2025Environment, Food and Rural Affairs Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 929)

We will come on a bit more to product design later in the questioning. On the point that you made, Richard, noting what the Chair said, about having threats against you and legal letters, without referencing who those might have come from, is that something you have experienced a lot as a scientist working in this area

57
8 Jul 2025Environment, Food and Rural Affairs Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 929)

I refer the House to my entry in the register of interests. Before diving in on the specifics of chemicals, I wanted to ask a general question, probably for Rudy and Allison. In the UK, which are the worst offenders and which are the companies you are impressed by?

49
8 Jul 2025Environment, Food and Rural Affairs Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 929)

We are coming on to that shortly. It was a more general point about who the worst offenders are, which companies are impressing you, and then on sachets particularly in the global south.

33
← PreviousPage 8 of 28 · click a debate to open the transcript with this MP’s speeches highlightedNext →
Sources
SourceHansard · official report
MethodEach row is one contribution (intervention or speech). Word count from the official text.