The Westminster lensArchive · §02 Speeches · 1,326 contributions

Speeches by Baldwin.

Every Hansard contribution by Harriett Baldwin this parliament, most recent first. Back to the MP page for the headline figures and analysed positions.

Showing 821840 of 1,326 contributions · most-recent first

← PreviousPage 42 of 67Next →
DateDebate & contributionWords
12 May 2025Product Regulation and Metrology Bill [Lords] (Second sitting)

It will not surprise the Committee to hear that, because our very sensible amendments to clause 2 have been rejected, we continue to have significant concerns about it and the extraordinary powers it confers on the Minister. In particular, subsection (7), which we tried to amend, will allow product regulations to provi

economy-jobstechnology
126
12 May 2025Product Regulation and Metrology Bill [Lords] (Second sitting)

We now move on to the enforcement powers in terms of the metrology regulations. I draw the Committee’s attention to the point I made on the enforcement regulations to do with the product regulations, because many of the same concerns exist here. In the case of clause 6(6), there is something that I personally think is

economy-jobstechnology
366
12 May 2025Product Regulation and Metrology Bill [Lords] (Second sitting)

I beg to move amendment 28, in clause 6, page 6, line 36, leave out subsection (1).

economy-jobstechnology
17
12 May 2025Product Regulation and Metrology Bill [Lords] (Second sitting)

With your guidance, Ms Vaz, I will try to combine my remarks on clause 5 and amendment 27. Again, the House of Lords Delegated Powers and Regulatory Reform Committee felt that the power in this clause was too sweeping. The Minister has mentioned that the pint is safe, but the sweeping powers cover pretty much any measu

economy-jobstechnology
151
12 May 2025Product Regulation and Metrology Bill [Lords] (Second sitting)

I beg to move amendment 27, in clause 5, page 6, line 8, leave out subsection (2). This amendment removes the powers granted to the Secretary of State under metrology regulations regarding quantities and units of measurement in marketing goods. We now come to the metrology part of the Bill. You will be glad to know, Ms

economy-jobstechnology
186
12 May 2025Product Regulation and Metrology Bill [Lords] (Second sitting)

As the Committee reaches its clause 4 moment, Members might be pleased to hear that I will not propose voting against it—[Hon. Members: “Oh!”] I know: a political conversion. I accept that in exceptional times, and unfortunately we have seen a few of those in recent years, the Government need these emergency powers. I

economy-jobstechnology
230
12 May 2025Product Regulation and Metrology Bill [Lords] (Second sitting)

Ms Vaz, you will not be surprised to hear that this dystopian picture of unnamed relevant authorities sweeping the land with their powers of seizure, fining and imprisonment is not something that we support, and we therefore oppose clause 3. Question put, That the clause stand part of the Bill.

economy-jobstechnology
50
12 May 2025Product Regulation and Metrology Bill [Lords] (Second sitting)

Sadly, I have not seen “Capricorn One”. I have already said clearly, on the record, that I have great confidence in the good intentions of the Minister himself and his Secretary of State. However, that is not to say that we should put powers on the statue book that would allow future occupiers of the position to send s

economy-jobstechnology
91
12 May 2025Product Regulation and Metrology Bill [Lords] (Second sitting)

I beg to move amendment 26, in clause 3, page 5, line 16, leave out subsections (9) to (11). Clause 3 continues to become even more dystopian. In the debate on clause 1, we acknowledged that we have an extremely benign Minister and Secretary of State, and we all acknowledge that products reach the UK marketplace that s

economy-jobstechnology
554
12 May 2025Product Regulation and Metrology Bill [Lords] (Second sitting)

I am not sure that I have heard enough to reassure the Opposition on the subject of who will be a relevant authority, which specific functions will be conferred on that relevant authority and the powers that might be granted to it, so I would like to press the amendments to a vote. Question put, That the amendment be m

economy-jobstechnology
60
12 May 2025Product Regulation and Metrology Bill [Lords] (Second sitting)

If I understand the Minister correctly, he is saying that “relevant authority” is strictly limited to the organisations that he has already mentioned.

economy-jobstechnology
23
12 May 2025Product Regulation and Metrology Bill [Lords] (Second sitting)

I would like to respond before I divide the Committee on this amendment. I seek your advice, Ms Vaz. The previous group contained amendments 21, 5 and 7, which relate to clause 2, and we may also want to get the Committee’s point of view on them. The Minister’s reluctance to make this innocuous change to the Bill speak

economy-jobstechnology
180
12 May 2025Product Regulation and Metrology Bill [Lords] (Second sitting)

It is a huge pleasure to serve under your chairmanship, Ms Vaz. We start by discussing some of the amendments we have tabled to clause 2. In this morning’s sitting we had a thorough discussion of the issues relating to clause 1, and we also discussed some amendments to clause 2. I hope, Ms Vaz, that you will allow the

economy-jobstechnology
828
12 May 2025Product Regulation and Metrology Bill [Lords] (Second sitting)

I beg to move amendment 20, in clause 2, page 3, line 41, leave out “EU” and insert “foreign”.

economy-jobstechnology
19
12 May 2025Product Regulation and Metrology Bill [ Lords ] (First sitting)

It is important to highlight the excluded products in the schedule. The powers that the Committee has just agreed to give to the Secretary of State will not cover food, plants, animal by-products, products of animal origin, aircraft, components of aircraft and radio equipment. Importantly, “unmanned aircraft designed o

economy-jobstechnologyfiscal-policy
238
12 May 2025Product Regulation and Metrology Bill [ Lords ] (First sitting)

Well, Sir John, I do have a very noisy fridge, but I am not sure it is helping me to order the milk. The crucial thing about amendment 17 is that it focuses on innovation. I appreciate that the Government Benches are not necessarily always as heavily weighted with those who have run or developed businesses themselves a

economy-jobstechnologyfiscal-policy
282
12 May 2025Product Regulation and Metrology Bill [ Lords ] (First sitting)

I beg to move amendment 17, in clause 1, page 1, line 21, at end insert— “(4A) The Secretary of State must also by regulations make provision aimed at promoting investment, fostering innovation, and encouraging economic growth in relation to the marketing or use of products in the United Kingdom. (4B) Regulations under

economy-jobstechnologyfiscal-policy
279
12 May 2025Product Regulation and Metrology Bill [ Lords ] (First sitting)

In the light of your guidance, Sir John, I would like to divide the Committee on all our amendments in this group.

economy-jobstechnologyfiscal-policy
22
12 May 2025Product Regulation and Metrology Bill [Lords] (Second sitting)

Ms Vaz, you heard it. For the record, I think I heard the Minister say that it is set out in the code of conduct, which I think means that extensions to the definition would be subject to the affirmative procedure and a consultation. I am hesitant to allow the clause to become legislation without those assurances.

economy-jobstechnology
57
12 May 2025Product Regulation and Metrology Bill [ Lords ] (First sitting)

It is accepted in the impact statement that that is one potential use of the powers, but if the Minister believes that, he will want to support our amendments in this group. Sir John, I understand that because amendment 14 fell, we were unable to divide on subsequent amendments in the first group. In this group, howeve

economy-jobstechnologyfiscal-policy
88
← PreviousPage 42 of 67 · click a debate to open the transcript with this MP’s speeches highlightedNext →
Sources
SourceHansard · official report
MethodEach row is one contribution (intervention or speech). Word count from the official text.