The Westminster lensArchive · §02 Speeches · 1,326 contributions

Speeches by Baldwin.

Every Hansard contribution by Harriett Baldwin this parliament, most recent first. Back to the MP page for the headline figures and analysed positions.

Showing 781800 of 1,326 contributions · most-recent first

← PreviousPage 40 of 67Next →
DateDebate & contributionWords
19 May 2025UK-EU Summit

May I have a serious answer to a very narrow and specific question? We know how many fishing rights the Prime Minister was prepared to give away for how many years in order to accede to the EU’s demands, but how much UK taxpayers’ money is he willing to hand over to the EU in order to sign up to its protectionist deman

economy-jobsdefenceimmigration
63
14 May 2025Product Regulation and Metrology Bill [Lords] (Third sitting)

I think I heard the Minister say that, were the Northern Ireland Assembly to pull the Stormont brake, the Secretary of State would potentially continue to apply EU regulation in GB under the powers in this Bill. If that is what I heard the Minister say—I think it is definitely what he said—it is important that I press

economy-jobslocal-governmenttechnology
74
14 May 2025Product Regulation and Metrology Bill [Lords] (Third sitting)

It is a pleasure to serve under your chairmanship, Ms Vaz. I put on record my thanks to the Minister for his rapid reply to the points that were raised on Tuesday. I asked questions on time limits for emergency powers under clause 4, on whether amending the definition of “online marketplace” will be subject to the affi

economy-jobslocal-governmenttechnology
446
14 May 2025Product Regulation and Metrology Bill [Lords] (Third sitting)

I beg to move, That the clause be read a Second time. New clause 2 is incredibly important. As the Committee heard on Tuesday, it is all too clear how many Henry VIII powers the Secretary of State is taking under this legislation. We do not need to rehearse the concerns raised about those wide-ranging Henry VIII powers

economy-jobslocal-governmenttechnology
1,091
14 May 2025Product Regulation and Metrology Bill [Lords] (Third sitting)

It is no surprise to the Committee that the Liberal Democrats’ position is to go back into the customs union, which would require dynamic alignment. It is clear from yesterday’s vote on the Opposition day motion how Government Members feel about it. I have given the Minister the opportunity to agree to this sensible ne

economy-jobslocal-governmenttechnology
174
14 May 2025Product Regulation and Metrology Bill [Lords] (Third sitting)

I beg to move, That the clause be read a Second time. Everyone on this Committee can agree that the UK is a proud global trading nation and, however we voted in the 2016 referendum, that one of the changes that has occurred has been our sovereignty over trade agreements. We agreed a comprehensive trade and co-operation

economy-jobslocal-governmenttechnology
1,247
14 May 2025Product Regulation and Metrology Bill [Lords] (Third sitting)

I would happily take the intervention.

economy-jobslocal-governmenttechnology
6
14 May 2025Product Regulation and Metrology Bill [Lords] (Third sitting)

Given the importance of this point, I would be grateful if the Minister put on the record his acknowledgment that dynamic alignment is an ask from our European Union partners in the negotiations ahead of next week’s summit.

economy-jobslocal-governmenttechnology
38
14 May 2025Product Regulation and Metrology Bill [Lords] (Third sitting)

The Minister just clarified for the record that, although it is not his or the Government’s intention to use the Bill in the way we have highlighted, those powers exist should they wish to exercise them. Both he and I have read about this in the media, as neither of us is privy to the discussions behind closed doors, b

economy-jobslocal-governmenttechnology
157
14 May 2025Product Regulation and Metrology Bill [Lords] (Third sitting)

I beg to move, That the clause be read a Second time. New clause 5 is designed to obtain clarification on the record from the Minister about how Government new clause 1, which was agreed to earlier, will interact with the provisions in the Windsor framework to do with the Stormont brake. As hon. Members will be aware,

economy-jobslocal-governmenttechnology
457
14 May 2025Product Regulation and Metrology Bill [Lords] (Third sitting)

I thank the hon. Member for Wokingham for moving the new clause and giving the Committee the opportunity to hear from the Government on this issue. The matter was raised extensively during proceedings on the Bill in the other place, and in the evidence that the Committee has received from members of the public and impo

economy-jobslocal-governmenttechnology
129
14 May 2025Product Regulation and Metrology Bill [Lords] (Third sitting)

I thank the hon. Member for Wokingham for raising this incredibly important and wide-ranging issue. He touched on some of its growing importance in the UK, where consumers are buying more and more products online. The hon. Gentleman brings his valuable expertise from the toy and hobby sector to the discussion. Above al

economy-jobslocal-governmenttechnology
165
14 May 2025Product Regulation and Metrology Bill [Lords] (Third sitting)

On Tuesday, on multiple occasions I made the point about how widely the Bill is drawn in terms of the bodies responsible for enforcement. I have a lot of sympathy with the hon. Member for Wokingham’s points about a trading standards enforcement review, which we think would be an important part of the ongoing scrutiny o

economy-jobslocal-governmenttechnology
68
14 May 2025Product Regulation and Metrology Bill [Lords] (Third sitting)

On a point of order, Ms Vaz. I am grateful for the opportunity to thank you for chairing, and Sir John for chairing Tuesday’s morning sitting. I thank the Committee members, particularly the Minister and his officials for their engagement on the important issues that have been raised, and I thank my colleagues. In orde

economy-jobslocal-governmenttechnology
92
14 May 2025Treasury Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 806)

Would you call them out then for having made these new investments—the ones I mentioned are all new—that sound more like the sort of thing you would expect from the Environment Agency?

32
14 May 2025Treasury Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 806)

We do not seem to have anyone co-investing.

8
14 May 2025Treasury Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 806)

That is going to be helpful for the chair of the National Wealth Fund as they go and find a new chief executive. Mr Cummings, I was very struck by the comparison that you made right at the beginning with the Norwegian sovereign wealth fund. The Norwegian sovereign wealth fund is a genuine wealth fund, is it not, where

123
14 May 2025Treasury Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 806)

It is proper wealth as well.

6
14 May 2025Treasury Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 806)

It is a misnomer to convince the British public that this is an actual wealth fund. This is the Government borrowing at the Government’s borrowing rate and then investing alongside, at a 3:1 ratio, in projects to hopefully make us wealthier and to make the debt go down. It is not directly a wealth fund.

55
14 May 2025Treasury Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 806)

Fair enough. In terms of governance, I want to ask the panel about some of the recent announcements that the National Wealth Fund has made. There has been the closure of the Grangemouth refinery, yet we hear the National Wealth Fund is putting £200 million into initiatives around Grangemouth. There has been the situati

262
← PreviousPage 40 of 67 · click a debate to open the transcript with this MP’s speeches highlightedNext →
Sources
SourceHansard · official report
MethodEach row is one contribution (intervention or speech). Word count from the official text.