Speeches by Baldwin.
Every Hansard contribution by Harriett Baldwin this parliament, most recent first. Back to the MP page for the headline figures and analysed positions.
Showing 561–580 of 1,317 contributions · most-recent first
| Date | Debate & contribution | Words |
|---|---|---|
| 22 Oct 2025 | Treasury Committee — Oral Evidence (2025-10-22) “Were they overly risk averse before?” | 6 |
| 22 Oct 2025 | Treasury Committee — Oral Evidence (2025-10-22) “That has changed.” | 3 |
| 22 Oct 2025 | Treasury Committee — Oral Evidence (2025-10-22) “Are you an advocate of the Bank of England bringing in a central bank digital currency?” | 16 |
| 22 Oct 2025 | Treasury Committee — Oral Evidence (2025-10-22) “Would you advocate for a particular stress test that has not been done yet or looked at?” | 17 |
| 22 Oct 2025 | Treasury Committee — Oral Evidence (2025-10-22) “Bringing to bear your expertise with quant, and your judgment from your experience to date, if we look at the stress tests run by the Bank to analyse where the potential risks might be, can you give us some commentary on whether you think it has been running the right sort of stress tests? Do you think there are stress…” | 81 |
| 22 Oct 2025 | Treasury Committee — Oral Evidence (2025-10-22) “As a potential to disintermediate a lot of the systemically important members of the financial system?” | 16 |
| 22 Oct 2025 | Treasury Committee — Oral Evidence (2025-10-22) “Do you think it poses any kind of risk to the financial system? In the past, we have been told it is not systemically important.” | 25 |
| 15 Oct 2025 | Treasury Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 684) “I am not sure whether I feel more or less worried than I did at the beginning of the session, but thank you.” | 23 |
| 15 Oct 2025 | Treasury Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 684) “Is that something we should be worried about in the context of artificial intelligence additionally being a structural problem for the UK?” | 22 |
| 15 Oct 2025 | Treasury Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 684) “That does not sound very reassuring. May I ask one final question on a slightly different topic? With protectionism and nationalism having been very prominent recently, to what extent does data fall into the area where we should worry about barriers being put in place for the flow of data?” | 50 |
| 15 Oct 2025 | Treasury Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 684) “Is your back-up plan pen and paper, as the National Cyber Security Centre recommended this week?” | 16 |
| 15 Oct 2025 | Treasury Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 684) “But the risk of the Bank of England, for example, being hacked and undermining our financial confidence as a country is so significant, Mr Mutton, that it must keep you up at night.” | 33 |
| 15 Oct 2025 | Treasury Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 684) “Thank you. Obviously, one of the risks we touched on is the cyber risk and the stress tests for industry participants. Clearly, one of the biggest worries is that bad actors get hold of some of the data, particularly now we are using so much more facial recognition and there are those databases and things like that. On…” | 81 |
| 15 Oct 2025 | Treasury Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 684) “Thank you. Changing subject, the Governor and the FPC recently made a statement about the valuation of AI stocks and the risk of a severe correction. Does that outweigh any of the other risks we have talked about today?” | 39 |
| 15 Oct 2025 | Treasury Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 684) “You have made a start and it sounds like there are more use cases to come, and more training. And at the Bank, Mr Mutton?” | 25 |
| 15 Oct 2025 | Treasury Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 684) “We have obviously had a really fascinating afternoon and a lot of subjects have been covered, but I am going to try to cover an eclectic bunch of things that have not been so far. The first question is, to what extent are your organisations using AI to reduce the cost of regulation, so that you are reducing your own co…” | 70 |
| 14 Oct 2025 | Treasury Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 1349) “With other inheritance taxes, people have known about the seven-year rule, but because farmers were exempt from that, there are farmers who are now well into their 70s and 80s who have not done it. Again, that seems to be fundamentally unfair.” | 42 |
| 14 Oct 2025 | Treasury Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 1349) “Or the future purchasers of them, yes.” | 7 |
| 14 Oct 2025 | Treasury Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 1349) “Food security for the United Kingdom.” | 6 |
| 14 Oct 2025 | Treasury Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 1349) “Would you all recommend that the Chancellor change the rules to reflect that? Are you all happy with those recommendations?” | 20 |