The Westminster lensArchive · §02 Speeches · 949 contributions

Speeches by Smith.

Every Hansard contribution by Greg Smith this parliament, most recent first. Back to the MP page for the headline figures and analysed positions.

Showing 821840 of 949 contributions · most-recent first

← PreviousPage 42 of 48Next →
DateDebate & contributionWords
28 Nov 2024Employment Rights Bill (Fourth sitting)

Q Thank you for that answer; we will explore that more in coming weeks. I accept the political narrative of doing something in 100 days. That is well-established for Governments around the world, and Conservative Governments in the past may well have been guilty of it too. However, this is a big, reforming piece of leg

labour-marketeconomy-jobs
298
28 Nov 2024Employment Rights Bill (Fourth sitting)

Q You mentioned the 20% unionisation rate. Do you have a target that you want to see? Andy Prendergast: They key thing for us is that everyone who ultimately wants to join a trade union has the option to do so. It is important that people are aware of their rights, aware that they can join trade unions, and aware that

labour-marketeconomy-jobs
122
28 Nov 2024Employment Rights Bill (Fourth sitting)

Q What does that look like? Mike Clancy: It probably looks like ensuring that the best practice from employers now—who allow us access to their intranet and to electronic and digital means, in terms of their staff—becomes the norm, and that it complies with data protection. That happens in workplaces up and down the co

labour-marketeconomy-jobs
476
28 Nov 2024Employment Rights Bill (Fourth sitting)

Q So you do not think that there is any part of the Bill that is deficient, and that your union would rather see strengthened or modified in any way. Mike Clancy: The key thing we would like to see is that access to workplaces is not confined to physical premises, but is also digital. That applies where union recogniti

labour-marketeconomy-jobs
120
28 Nov 2024Employment Rights Bill (Fourth sitting)

Q I hope my last point might be more consensual as we move forward. I was very sympathetic to one of the sides of this coin before the Committee started, and the evidence today has given me food for thought on the other one. The first part is bereavement leave in the event of pregnancy loss, which is a position I have

labour-marketeconomy-jobs
195
28 Nov 2024Employment Rights Bill (Fourth sitting)

Q I have two more points, if I may. First, clearly, some of the most striking evidence we heard that did not agree with much of the Bill was from Luke Johnson and Michael Lorimer earlier. Do you feel that the Government have engaged those who run businesses and employ people in the private sector, as opposed to represe

labour-marketeconomy-jobs
185
28 Nov 2024Employment Rights Bill (Third sitting)

Q Good afternoon. May I come back to the question I put to the previous panel about the Regulatory Policy Committee’s verdict on the impact assessments for the Bill? I am confident—unless you shout me down instantly—that the Resolution Foundation will have looked at that and have done some research around it. Do you sh

labour-marketeconomy-jobs
98
28 Nov 2024Employment Rights Bill (Fourth sitting)

Q I am slightly bemused by having a member of the Committee also answering questions. Many of the things that I and my colleagues from the official Opposition will be asking you will come in the line-by-line sessions in the coming weeks, but may I briefly ask you about the Regulatory Policy Committee? I fully appreciat

labour-marketeconomy-jobs
682
28 Nov 2024Employment Rights Bill (Fourth sitting)

That is very helpful. Thank you.

labour-marketeconomy-jobs
6
28 Nov 2024Employment Rights Bill (Fourth sitting)

Q That is a hugely comprehensive answer, and I am very grateful for it. One bit of evidence we heard from other witnesses earlier in the week, which I do not think you covered in your list, was a disappointment that there has not been an extension to bereavement leave in the horrible, sad circumstances of a pregnancy l

labour-marketeconomy-jobs
136
28 Nov 2024Employment Rights Bill (Fourth sitting)

Q I hesitate to interrupt you, but can you give us an indication of where you think statutory sick pay should sit? What should its value be? Dr Stephenson: At least at the level of maternity pay, for example. We are one of only four countries in Europe that does not extend some right to sick pay to self-employed people

labour-marketeconomy-jobs
362
28 Nov 2024Employment Rights Bill (Fourth sitting)

Q Good afternoon, doctor. Given the work you do, which you have just described, what is your assessment of what the Bill will do for women and men in the workplace? Dr Stephenson: We think this Bill marks an important step in the right direction in improving the rights of women in the workplace. We particularly welcome

labour-marketeconomy-jobs
457
28 Nov 2024Employment Rights Bill (Fourth sitting)

Q I appreciate that, from the perspective of the Department of Business and Trade, there might be a more clearcut answer, but from your perspective, Mr Kirkpatrick, given your answer earlier, do you think there is a high risk that the measures in the Bill could reduce the number of jobs in the UK economy? John Kirkpatr

labour-marketeconomy-jobs
159
28 Nov 2024Employment Rights Bill (Fourth sitting)

Q I have a straightforward question that will probably provoke some debate. Impact assessments of any bit of legislation are clearly hugely important to the Equality and Human Rights Commission. Who is right—the Government or the Regulatory Policy Committee—in their condemnation of the impact assessments? John Kirkpatr

labour-marketeconomy-jobs
401
28 Nov 2024Employment Rights Bill (Fourth sitting)

Q I certainly recognise the picture you paint of Banbury; it is very close to my constituency and I am sure you have people from Buckinghamshire on your payroll. What modelling and projections have you done—on the presumption that the Bill becomes law and obtains Royal Assent at some point next year—on employment numbe

labour-marketeconomy-jobs
654
28 Nov 2024Employment Rights Bill (Fourth sitting)

Q Good afternoon, gentlemen. This is a far-reaching Bill. We have heard from the Government and from other witnesses that there is potentially a £5 billion cost to the economy associated with it. Others have suggested that that might even be a small c conservative estimate. From the perspective of your business interes

labour-marketeconomy-jobs
830
28 Nov 2024Employment Rights Bill (Fourth sitting)

Q My final question is off the back of that. On Tuesday, Mick Lynch—let us name him—told us that the Bill will lead to the re-unionisation of the economy. Is he getting overexcited? Professor Simms: We have to be realistic about the resource capacity of our trade union movement at the moment. There are certainly things

labour-marketeconomy-jobs
486
28 Nov 2024Employment Rights Bill (Fourth sitting)

Q I am sure you will have seen that the Regulatory Policy Committee has been quite damning of the impact assessments done on the Bill. You said that it has been delivered at lightning speed, so perhaps we should not be surprised that the impact assessments do not necessarily add up. How concerned are you on a point of

labour-marketeconomy-jobs
801
28 Nov 2024Employment Rights Bill (Fourth sitting)

Q Good afternoon to the witnesses. You are professors of law, but we have heard from other witnesses that the Bill has a lot of holes in it and is very reliant on secondary legislation further down the track. Given that it is such a reforming piece of proposed legislation, do you believe it to be a good proposal, in te

labour-marketeconomy-jobs
443
28 Nov 2024Employment Rights Bill (Third sitting)

Q This is my final question for you, and then I will bring in the others for the same set of questions. Do you believe, in principle, that the Bill will cost the Co-op money? Claire Costello: Yes, there will be on-costs from the Bill. Do I think it is the right thing overall? Again, we are broadly supportive of where i

labour-marketeconomy-jobs
71
← PreviousPage 42 of 48 · click a debate to open the transcript with this MP’s speeches highlightedNext →
Sources
SourceHansard · official report
MethodEach row is one contribution (intervention or speech). Word count from the official text.