The Westminster lensArchive · §02 Speeches · 410 contributions

Speeches by Lewell.

Every Hansard contribution by Emma Lewell this parliament, most recent first. Back to the MP page for the headline figures and analysed positions.

Showing 161180 of 410 contributions · most-recent first

← PreviousPage 9 of 21Next →
DateDebate & contributionWords
27 Jan 2026Defence Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 973)

Out of the coalition of the willing, why do you think other members have not given the same commitment that the UK and France have given?

26
27 Jan 2026Defence Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 973)

What I am trying to pin you down on, Secretary of State, is that you accepted those recommendations, so are the things that I have just read out going to happen?

31
27 Jan 2026Defence Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 973)

I just want to move on to Ukraine and the coalition of the willing. Secretary of State, do you have a strategy for parliamentary engagement in advance of a vote on the coalition of the willing? As you will know from your statement in the House, there are multiple unanswered questions regarding the actual detail of the

76
27 Jan 2026Defence Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 973)

What if things are fast-moving and it is recess or that is just not possible? There is every likelihood that troops could be deployed without a vote in Parliament under royal prerogative, is there not?

35
27 Jan 2026Defence Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 973)

Is the money there for all those things, Secretary of State? Because that is a lot of costly items.

19
27 Jan 2026Defence Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 973)

So will they be in the Defence Investment Plan?

9
27 Jan 2026Defence Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 973)

Just a quick one from me, and it might seem a bit obvious, but since the Government accepted all 62 of the recommendations in the SDR—which included 12 new F-35As, the 12 SSN-AUKUS nuclear subs, six munitions factories, £6 billion in munitions procurement, 7,000 long-range missiles, and £1 billion for homeland air defe

63
27 Jan 2026Defence Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 973)

I am looking at the terms of reference from the SDR now and what you are saying does not align with them. What Calvin and I are trying to understand is what changed from the terms of reference to the SDR being produced?

43
27 Jan 2026Defence Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 973)

Secretary of State, if I can try to simplify it because I tend to speak quite bluntly and straight. The SDR was supposed to identify reprioritisation but it did not; the reviewers were clear with us that that had been removed. Why did the SDR go from its terms of reference saying that it should identify what defence sh

79
27 Jan 2026Defence Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 973)

If that does happen, would you commit to coming back as soon as possible afterwards to give the details?

19
21 Jan 2026 Dementia Support: Hampshire

I will call Liz Jarvis to move the motion. I will then call the Minister to respond. I remind other Members that they may make a speech only with prior permission from the Member in charge and the Minister. As is the convention for 30-minute debates, there will not be an opportunity for the Member in charge to wind up.

social-carehealthlocal-government
60
21 Jan 2026Animal Welfare Strategy for England

I am immediately imposing a four-minute time limit on Back-Bench speeches, so not every Member will get to speak. However, if Members keep their speeches shorter, more people will get in.

agricultureenvironmentculture-community
31
20 Jan 2026Defence Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 1304)

That is what I was driving at. Ministers will rightly apologise for things and be held to account, but who else was accountable for this? Have they been held to account for what happened here?

35
20 Jan 2026Defence Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 1304)

Sorry to interrupt, but the Chair is conscious of time. In any organisation, if you make an error on this scale and are not held to account, you are likely to make it again.

34
20 Jan 2026Defence Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 1304)

The point I am trying to make is that, if the right people have not been held to account, it does not negate things like this happening in the future. From what I am hearing from you, you do not think that everyone has been held to account. I do not want to paraphrase you, but it sounds like you are saying that not eve

70
20 Jan 2026Defence Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 1304)

Do you think the right people have been held accountable for the data breach and its consequences?

17
20 Jan 2026Defence Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 1304)

Thank you. Sorry for cutting you off; I know the Chair is very keen to conclude.

16
20 Jan 2026Defence Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 1304)

I have lots of constituents who still do not know whether their wider family are alive or not. That haunts me. Do you think the Department actually understands that? I know that you left not long after the breach became known, but was the culture there that people understood the wider implications of all that? Did peop

66
20 Jan 2026Defence Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 1304)

We now know that the breach involved risk to life for thousands of Afghans and cost the UK public purse hundreds of millions, if not billions, of pounds. Continuing on my colleagues’ theme, how were you assured during your time in office that the Department genuinely got it, understood the impact of the breach and had

62
20 Jan 2026Defence Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 1304)

On what basis, though? What advice were you getting that, in that short space of time, the situation would have changed?

21
← PreviousPage 9 of 21 · click a debate to open the transcript with this MP’s speeches highlightedNext →
Sources
SourceHansard · official report
MethodEach row is one contribution (intervention or speech). Word count from the official text.