The Westminster lensArchive · §02 Speeches · 784 contributions

Speeches by Morello.

Every Hansard contribution by Edward Morello this parliament, most recent first. Back to the MP page for the headline figures and analysed positions.

Showing 2140 of 784 contributions · most-recent first

← PreviousPage 2 of 40Next →
DateDebate & contributionWords
29 Apr 2026Foreign Affairs Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 385)

Apologies if we are going over the same point here, but for the point of clarity, the due diligence report is produced by the Cabinet Office. You received that. Did the Prime Minister receive the full unredacted due diligence report, or did you summarise it, or did you brief him orally? What did the Prime Minister rece

57
29 Apr 2026Foreign Affairs Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 385)

Okay. Did he express any reservations at that point about the appointment of Peter Mandelson?

15
29 Apr 2026Foreign Affairs Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 385)

I want to quickly go back to your presentation of the conversation with Matthew Doyle: that if there were upcoming ambassadorial posts in the Foreign Office, he should consider applying for them. Can you see how, if you were Matthew Doyle and had just seen the Prime Minister ram Peter Mandelson down the throat of the F

95
29 Apr 2026Foreign Affairs Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 385)

I want to return to the original questions at the opening. You talked about the timeline and that, in meetings with Simon Case prior to coming into Government, the Prime Minister was already minded to make a political appointment. According to what you have said, at that point no names were being discussed, but why was

116
29 Apr 2026Foreign Affairs Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 385)

He received the full report. Did you discuss the contents of the report with him?

15
29 Apr 2026Foreign Affairs Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 385)

To the Chair’s point about this looking like it was a railroaded decision, prior to the election, you already have the PM identifying that position as one he wants to make a political appointment to. You then have two candidates—again, not to speak to the suitability of either of them, but one is a friend of Jeffrey Ep

166
29 Apr 2026Foreign Affairs Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 385)

I appreciate that. You said that you were not involved in the decision-making process around Peter Mandelson because it was a political appointment. Was the Foreign Secretary involved in the decision making?

32
29 Apr 2026Foreign Affairs Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 385)

Do you have a view on the accuracy of the statement?

11
29 Apr 2026Foreign Affairs Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 385)

The 18th.

2
29 Apr 2026Foreign Affairs Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 385)

So you were informed on the 15th that the Prime Minister wanted to appoint Peter Mandelson?

16
29 Apr 2026Foreign Affairs Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 385)

Okay. I mentioned already you served under four Prime Ministers. A search through the records, and you can correct me on this, suggests that the only other political appointment that happened during your tenure as permanent secretary was Sir George Hollingbery, the former Member of Parliament for Meon Valley, who was a

80
29 Apr 2026Foreign Affairs Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 385)

It does, thank you. More broadly in terms of the process, you have already mentioned that you have never seen the now infamous traffic-light boxes. Apparently, according to the letter we received last night, the departmental head of security had also never seen the traffic-light boxes and was not aware of them. Sir Oll

97
29 Apr 2026Foreign Affairs Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 385)

I think this follows on from what Alex was asking you, Sir Philip. You are requesting to see the due diligence report; you are flagging to the Foreign Secretary that you have concerns. In his evidence, Sir Olly told us that this was the only time in which the security department requested to see him on whether to grant

97
29 Apr 2026Foreign Affairs Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 385)

So that was unique. Given that you never had cause to see the traffic-light system, should we read anything into the fact that Sir Olly, when he had that meeting, was not shown it?

34
29 Apr 2026Foreign Affairs Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 385)

Did that conversation happen at a point at which he had read the report? There is a difference between receiving the report and reading it, I guess.

27
29 Apr 2026Foreign Affairs Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 385)

Do you want me to narrow it down?

8
29 Apr 2026Foreign Affairs Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 385)

No, you wouldn’t have because he would have been sitting there thinking, “Well, if I want the job I am definitely going to get it because the Prime Minister got Peter Mandelson one.”

33
29 Apr 2026Foreign Affairs Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 385)

That is not what Sir Olly Robbins told us. Sir Olly Robbins told us that Matthew Doyle’s name was another one floated as a political appointee. Given that when the Prime Minister politically appointed Mandelson it was a lock, it would be fair to assume, if you are Matthew Doyle, that effectively a similar guarantee was

60
29 Apr 2026Foreign Affairs Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 385)

I guess I am going back to what you said earlier, which is that the Prime Minister talks to lots of people before coming to the decision himself, but so far, everyone who you have listed seems to be on the fence as to whether or not Peter Mandelson was a good appointment or worth the risk. How do you get to the point w

110
29 Apr 2026Foreign Affairs Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 385)

In any conversations with No. 10 were you ever asked to withhold information from the Foreign Secretary?

17
← PreviousPage 2 of 40 · click a debate to open the transcript with this MP’s speeches highlightedNext →
Sources
SourceHansard · official report
MethodEach row is one contribution (intervention or speech). Word count from the official text.