The Westminster lensArchive · §02 Speeches · 335 contributions

Speeches by Smith.

Every Hansard contribution by David Smith this parliament, most recent first. Back to the MP page for the headline figures and analysed positions.

Showing 241260 of 335 contributions · most-recent first

← PreviousPage 13 of 17Next →
DateDebate & contributionWords
4 Feb 2025Environment, Food and Rural Affairs Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 611)

Let me try to explain. ASF checks were introduced in 2022. We work really closely in Dover together. We found a fairly significant increase in meat importations. That gives an indication, data and more intelligence that then leads to further success. You are actually right that more activity leads to success, but some

85
4 Feb 2025Environment, Food and Rural Affairs Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 611)

There is a role for deterrence, yes, absolutely.

8
4 Feb 2025Environment, Food and Rural Affairs Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 611)

That is a good question at the moment. Border Force does everything it can with the current structures and resources that it has in place. We have a very good working relationship with DEFRA and I can explain the structure of our working relationship and how that information is shared, if you would like me to.

56
4 Feb 2025Environment, Food and Rural Affairs Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 611)

No.

1
4 Feb 2025Environment, Food and Rural Affairs Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 611)

I cannot comment on those previous figures, sorry, no.

9
4 Feb 2025Environment, Food and Rural Affairs Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 611)

We do not publish port-specific data. At national level, I can speak to the last three calendar years. In 2022, there were approximately 2,400 seizures and 128 tonnes were seized. In 2023, there were approximately 2,900 seizures and 164 tonnes. In 2024, there were approximately 2,600 seizures and 235 tonnes. That is en

150
4 Feb 2025Environment, Food and Rural Affairs Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 611)

Border Force does not have responsibility for prosecution in any of our prohibitions and restrictions. That is a question for DEFRA. DEFRA has the policy and is responsible for the prosecution policy.

32
4 Feb 2025Environment, Food and Rural Affairs Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 611)

It might help if I explain the structure first and how we work with DEFRA and other agencies to apply our controls at the frontline. The model is broadly the same for whatever agency we are dealing with, whether that is to deal with illegal meat or illegal drugs. We have a steering structure at the strategic level. We

421
4 Feb 2025Environment, Food and Rural Affairs Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 611)

It is a priority and we take it very seriously in the context of the conversations we have across Government about our strategic responsibilities. We deal with whatever we are told is important from a DEFRA perspective. It goes into our model and our model tells the frontline officers what to look for and what to detec

57
4 Feb 2025Environment, Food and Rural Affairs Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 611)

I disagree. I am afraid I do not agree with that and I do not think Lucy would either. We work in very close collaboration with our colleagues in Dover and around the country to do as much as we can in this space.

44
4 Feb 2025Environment, Food and Rural Affairs Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 611)

Yes, to do as much as we can in this space, given the model that I have explained to the Committee with the resources that we have available to do what we can do.

34
4 Feb 2025Environment, Food and Rural Affairs Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 611)

I cannot comment on whether organised crime is involved in illegal meat importations. That is a question for DEFRA. It owns the intelligence on illegal meat importation, so I cannot comment, I am afraid.

34
4 Feb 2025Environment, Food and Rural Affairs Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 611)

I am afraid I cannot, no. I cannot comment.

9
4 Feb 2025Environment, Food and Rural Affairs Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 611)

It is because it is a matter for DEFRA to answer, I am afraid. I do not have any information that I can share with you.

26
4 Feb 2025Environment, Food and Rural Affairs Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 611)

DEFRA shares with us appropriate information through the intelligence-sharing gateway. Whatever it understands about illegal meat importation is shared via that gateway. We then have a Home Office intelligence team that takes data from a range of different organisations and they plough that into our frontline service t

86
4 Feb 2025Environment, Food and Rural Affairs Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 611)

I do not know enough about illegal meat smuggling, because it is not my area of responsibility. We are responsible for detecting it and referring it to other agencies. We are not responsible for the strategy or the intelligence-gathering. It is not part of Home Office’s responsibility to gather intelligence on illegal

54
4 Feb 2025Environment, Food and Rural Affairs Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 611)

No. We do not do any of that end‑to‑end assessment.

10
4 Feb 2025Environment, Food and Rural Affairs Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 611)

Data from all of the detections and seizures goes on to our database, which is available for analysis. Yes, there are obvious trends that you see in Dover.

28
4 Feb 2025Environment, Food and Rural Affairs Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 611)

The countries that export meat will be the countries that we see vehicles from—those that export meat that have restrictions. Lucy is probably better placed to answer that question specifically, but eastern Europe is one of the source areas for this meat.

42
4 Feb 2025Environment, Food and Rural Affairs Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 611)

A long time ago, yes.

5
← PreviousPage 13 of 17 · click a debate to open the transcript with this MP’s speeches highlightedNext →
Sources
SourceHansard · official report
MethodEach row is one contribution (intervention or speech). Word count from the official text.