The Westminster lensArchive · §02 Speeches · 223 contributions

Speeches by Davis.

Every Hansard contribution by David Davis this parliament, most recent first. Back to the MP page for the headline figures and analysed positions.

Showing 81100 of 223 contributions · most-recent first

← PreviousPage 5 of 12Next →
DateDebate & contributionWords
4 Nov 2025Backbench Business Committee — Oral Evidence (2025-11-04)

I have no doubt that we can put something together.

10
3 Nov 2025“Soldier F” Trial Verdict

The Front Benchers have rightly referred to the pain of the relatives of those who died on Bloody Sunday. We all share their sympathy, but nothing justifies the persecution of innocent people, particularly innocent veterans. The judge in the trial said: “The evidence presented by the Crown falls well short of…the high

defencecrimesocial-care
173
3 Nov 2025“Soldier F” Trial Verdict

On a point of order, Mr Speaker.

defencecrimesocial-care
7
3 Nov 2025“Soldier F” Trial Verdict

During his responses today, the Secretary of State has said two things: on the one hand, he said that letters of comfort do not give immunity; and on the other hand, he accepted that letters of comfort stopped the prosecution of Mr Downey for the Hyde Park bombing. It seems to me that those two statements are inconsist

defencecrimesocial-care
73
21 Oct 2025Devolution in Scotland

Powers, yes, in terms of order and the balance of power between Parliament and Government, which he wanted to be much stronger as well. Does the hon. Lady think that that would be a good thing?

local-governmenteconomy-jobseducation
36
21 Oct 2025Devolution in Scotland

Will the hon. Lady give way?

local-governmenteconomy-jobseducation
6
21 Oct 2025Devolution in Scotland

I cannot really comment on electronic voting, but I was going to make a comment in the other direction—about learning in both directions. I believe that Donald Dewar, in his heroic struggle to bring about devolution, wanted a strong Scottish Parliament, in terms of privilege, in terms of the right to summon Ministers—

local-governmenteconomy-jobseducation
53
20 Oct 2025 Mandatory Digital ID

In view of the time limits, I will focus solely on the scandalously insecure One Login procedure. I will be writing to ask the National Audit Office to investigate because, apart from the strategic weakness of having a single login, the Government’s handling has been a disaster. As early as 2022, the information assura

immigrationother
167
20 Oct 2025 Mandatory Digital ID

Why do the Government’s cyber experts disagree?

immigrationother
7
20 Oct 2025 Mandatory Digital ID

No.

immigrationother
1
20 Oct 2025 Mandatory Digital ID

The tech has already been abroad. It has already been in Romania, and it is quite possible that malware is already inside it.

immigrationother
23
14 Oct 2025Northern Ireland Troubles (Legacy and Reconciliation) Act 2023

The Secretary of State’s allegations about the legacy Act rest on a fiction that the Labour Government have not already handed out amnesties to all those terrorist killers. Two facts need to be put in front of the House. One is from the Good Friday agreement, which “put in place mechanisms to provide for an accelerated

defencecrimeother
181
13 Oct 2025 Northern Ireland Troubles

In March of this year, it was widely reported that the Secretary of State gave his word to Mairead Kelly, the sister of IRA murderer Patrick Kelly, that there would be an inquest on the Loughgall incident. Is this remedial order a fulfilment of that promise? If so, it means that 30 years on, the Government are dragging

defencecrimesocial-care
160
12 Oct 2025 Security Update: Official Secrets Act Case

The Minister used the Roussev case in his own defence. In that case, the Court of Appeal set the clear precedent that the appropriate definition of an enemy state is not based on what the Government say—it is a state that behaves like an enemy. The judge stated plainly that “There is no reason in our view why the term

defencemp-performancecrime
199
15 Sept 2025Ambassador to the United States

I say to my right hon. Friend that the Prime Minister gave what was clearly—what can I say?—a lawyer’s answer to that question, which as we all know is not a proper answer at all. No. 10 was well aware that Mandelson had continued his relationship with Epstein after he was convicted as a paedophile. How the Prime Minis

mp-performancedefenceother
93
15 Sept 2025Ambassador to the United States

No, I really am coming to an end. I will quote just one of them. This is a long-standing senior Labour Member: “I care that this culture of turning a blind eye to horrendous behaviour is endemic at the top of society”. I agree with him. When individuals with such associations are ushered back into the heart of Governme

mp-performancedefenceother
152
15 Sept 2025Ambassador to the United States

I am going to be very gentle. Let me just say that we are talking about a very serious issue, in which the national interest is engaged, and about somebody who in my view has used his public position to his own advantage and to the disadvantage of the state. That is not true of some candidate working in a junior role f

mp-performancedefenceother
212
15 Sept 2025Ambassador to the United States

My right hon. Friend makes a very good point. I certainly think that that would be the right way to go for political appointments. It would probably be the right way to go for the top dozen embassies. I would not worry about all of them, without being rude to—well, I won’t pick a country. That would just be meaningless

mp-performancedefenceother
68
15 Sept 2025Ambassador to the United States

Had the hon. Gentleman been here before the last election, he would have sat in this Chamber, I hope, and heard me opine on all those subjects and raise prospective laws to deal with those oligarchs, laws that, sadly, this Government have failed to carry through. That, then, is the backdrop. Mr Deripaska’s visa was rev

mp-performancedefenceother
578
15 Sept 2025Ambassador to the United States

The hon. Member has made a theoretical argument and a general argument, but the actual argument is that Karen Pierce was a brilliant campaigner who would never have made the mistakes made by Lord Mandelson, which he alludes to, and she should not have been replaced.

mp-performancedefenceother
46
← PreviousPage 5 of 12 · click a debate to open the transcript with this MP’s speeches highlightedNext →
Sources
SourceHansard · official report
MethodEach row is one contribution (intervention or speech). Word count from the official text.