The Westminster lensArchive · §02 Speeches · 1,213 contributions

Speeches by Jones.

Every Hansard contribution by Darren Jones this parliament, most recent first. Back to the MP page for the headline figures and analysed positions.

Showing 421440 of 1,213 contributions · most-recent first

← PreviousPage 22 of 61Next →
DateDebate & contributionWords
2 Feb 2026US Department of Justice Release of Files

I congratulate my hon. Friend on all his tireless campaigning on the Hillsborough law, and I reaffirm the Government’s commitment to bringing that legislation back to the House as soon as possible. In respect of Peter Mandelson’s appointment as ambassador to the United States, and the Prime Minister’s decision to sack

crimemp-performancedefence
75
2 Feb 2026US Department of Justice Release of Files

I think the Register of Members’ Financial Interests is a matter for the House, not the Government, but I am sure that the House authorities will have heard the hon. Gentleman’s question. He asked a question about an investigation, and the answer is yes. Everybody—whether it is the Government, individuals involved or t

crimemp-performancedefence
90
2 Feb 2026US Department of Justice Release of Files

I share my hon. Friend’s disgust at what has taken place. As I have said, the House of Lords must update its procedures to ensure that there are consequences for the behaviour of Members who bring their House into disrepute. The House of Commons has been able to do that in recent years, and there is no reason why the o

crimemp-performancedefence
87
2 Feb 2026US Department of Justice Release of Files

On the first part of the hon. Lady’s question, as the Prime Minister made very clear, when the extent and depth of the relationship between Peter Mandelson and Jeffrey Epstein post his conviction became clear, the Prime Minister moved very quickly indeed to sack Peter Mandelson as ambassador to the United States. The P

crimemp-performancedefence
115
2 Feb 2026US Department of Justice Release of Files

My hon. Friend is absolutely right that releasing Government information in and of itself, let alone for personal or commercial gain, is wrong and a breach of rules that we all must comply with. If that is what happened, there should be appropriate investigations and consequences for that behaviour.

crimemp-performancedefence
49
2 Feb 2026US Department of Justice Release of Files

My hon. Friend knows that the Government have committed to reducing violence against women and girls, and have recently brought forward a strategy, setting out how we will work across Government to do just that in the years ahead. Specifically on the victims of Jeffrey Epstein, we will continue to do all we can to supp

crimemp-performancedefence
77
2 Feb 2026US Department of Justice Release of Files

I have to refute in the strongest possible terms any accusation that the Government would seek to interfere in, or block, any investigation in relation to Jeffrey Epstein. It is absolutely wrong to suggest that documents would be made unavailable or deleted. The Cabinet Secretary is today reviewing the Government archi

crimemp-performancedefence
98
2 Feb 2026US Department of Justice Release of Files

The Prime Minister has acted at every stage with integrity. It is Peter Mandelson who has to be accountable for the actions of Peter Mandelson. To suggest that the Prime Minister should be responsible for the actions of Peter Mandelson is obviously wrong-headed. As I said in my statement, Peter Mandelson, who is no lon

crimemp-performancedefence
72
2 Feb 2026US Department of Justice Release of Files

My hon. Friend is absolutely right. The Government, and specifically the Prime Minister, have already strengthened the ministerial code that we are all subject to in this House, and have made the ethics adviser independent. That gives the ethics adviser the authority to investigate Ministers freely, without requiring p

crimemp-performancedefence
117
2 Feb 2026US Department of Justice Release of Files

I am not sure that I agree with the hon. Lady that there has been any undue delay in investigation. At the time of his appointment, Peter Mandelson gave the Prime Minister a commitment about his relationship with Jeffrey Epstein, but it became evident when documents were released that the reality was different. Within

crimemp-performancedefence
116
2 Feb 2026US Department of Justice Release of Files

My hon. Friend is right that the public expect that if we break the law or the rules, there should be consequences. In this House, that is the case, but in the House of Lords, it is not. That is why the Government are encouraging the appropriate authorities in the House of Lords to come forward with proposals to change

crimemp-performancedefence
81
2 Feb 2026US Department of Justice Release of Files

I say to the right hon. Gentleman and the House that, whether it is Peter Mandelson, Michelle Mone or other peers who have brought the other place into disrepute, there needs to be a process for removing peerages. The Government are making it very clear today that this should be conducted on a cross-party basis to ensu

crimemp-performancedefence
95
2 Feb 2026US Department of Justice Release of Files

To be clear, the documents produced by the United States Department of Justice were not available to the Government until they were released a number of days ago. As soon as they have become available, we have instigated processes in our own authorities to make sure that we have a clear view of what information was ava

crimemp-performancedefence
73
2 Feb 2026US Department of Justice Release of Files

The hon. Lady knows that it is not the Government who instigate criminal investigations. It is for the Crown Prosecution Service and the police to take those decisions independently of Ministers. Whether in respect of UK investigations or investigations in the United States, the Government have made it very clear that

crimemp-performancedefence
75
2 Feb 2026US Department of Justice Release of Files

As far as I am aware, no Member of this House had access to the information recently published by the United States Department for Justice, or to the documents that were released at the time the Prime Minister sacked the ambassador to the United States. The Prime Minister has previously been very clear to the House tha

crimemp-performancedefence
74
2 Feb 2026US Department of Justice Release of Files

The Prime Minister’s judgment was made clear when, as soon as information that he had been misled by Peter Mandelson became available, he sacked him.

crimemp-performancedefence
25
2 Feb 2026US Department of Justice Release of Files

I was not aware of that issue, so I thank the hon. Gentleman for bringing it to my attention. If there are any British victims affected by the crimes of Jeffrey Epstein, whether in relation to the latest publication of documents or otherwise, Government services stand ready to be of support to those victims and to ensu

crimemp-performancedefence
62
2 Feb 2026US Department of Justice Release of Files

As I have informed the House today, the Cabinet Secretary is reviewing all documentation relating to Peter Mandelson’s time as a Minister in the last Labour Government to see what information is available today, and we will comply with any investigations that take place as a consequence. The hon. Member is right that a

crimemp-performancedefence
90
2 Feb 2026US Department of Justice Release of Files

The information that became available in September that led to the sacking of Peter Mandelson as ambassador to the United States made it clear for the first time, to all of us and to the Prime Minister, that Peter Mandelson not only remained a friend of Jeffrey Epstein following his conviction but had actively mentored

crimemp-performancedefence
143
2 Feb 2026US Department of Justice Release of Files

The hon. Member knows that the Government have stated and believe that Peter Mandelson should not be a Member of the House of Lords and should not use his title, but he is right that the rules need to be updated to allow that action to be taken by the House of Lords. We have written to the House of Lords authorities to

crimemp-performancedefence
80
← PreviousPage 22 of 61 · click a debate to open the transcript with this MP’s speeches highlightedNext →
Sources
SourceHansard · official report
MethodEach row is one contribution (intervention or speech). Word count from the official text.