The Westminster lensArchive · §02 Speeches · 881 contributions

Speeches by Kruger.

Every Hansard contribution by Danny Kruger this parliament, most recent first. Back to the MP page for the headline figures and analysed positions.

Showing 461480 of 881 contributions · most-recent first

← PreviousPage 24 of 45Next →
DateDebate & contributionWords
11 Mar 2025Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill (Twenty First sitting)

Again, I will not press this amendment; I just want to put on record my support for the principle. This amendment, tabled by the hon. Member for York Central, is quite a clever device: if we were sticking with the High Court, it would have meant that someone with genuine concerns, for example a family member or acquain

healthsocial-care
213
11 Mar 2025Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill (Twenty First sitting)

I beg to move amendment 312, in clause 12, page 8, line 34, at end insert— “(7A) Any person who wishes to challenge an application for a declaration under subsection (1) must enter a caveat in any district registry of the High Court within 14 days of the application being lodged or received, stating their belief that t

healthsocial-care
149
11 Mar 2025Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill (Twenty First sitting)

I beg to ask leave to withdraw the amendment. Amendment, by leave, withdrawn.

healthsocial-care
13
11 Mar 2025Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill (Twenty First sitting)

I recognise that we are moving on and that we want to get on to the substantive clauses, and I certainly will not press these amendments to a vote. However, I want to put on record that I have extreme concerns about the role of the proxy in clause 15. It is unclear to me why a proxy is needed. I regret that we are not

healthsocial-care
90
11 Mar 2025Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill (Twenty First sitting)

I beg to move amendment 432, in clause 12, page 8, line 31, leave out paragraph (a). This amendment is linked to amendments which remove proxies from the Bill.

healthsocial-care
29
11 Mar 2025Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill (Twenty First sitting)

Those might be appropriate reasons; I hope that can be specified. The crucial thing is that if there is an unwillingness—not an incapacity but an unwillingness—to proceed, that is of some concern. It is not that they are no longer able to do it—possibly for the reasons that the hon. Lady suggested—but if there is an ac

healthsocial-care
176
11 Mar 2025Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill (Twenty First sitting)

I want to speak briefly in support of the hon. Lady’s amendment and also in support of amendment 310, tabled by the hon. Member for York Central. The hon. Member for Richmond Park is absolutely right. I will not rehearse her argument, which is very straightforward. The question is: what other reason could there be to j

healthsocial-care
122
11 Mar 2025Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill (Twenty First sitting)

I beg to ask leave to withdraw the amendment. Amendment, by leave, withdrawn. Amendments made: 423, in clause 9, page 6, line 20, at end insert— “(2A) To inform their assessment, the assessing doctor must— (a) consider whether they should consult a health professional or social care professional with qualifications in,

healthsocial-care
427
11 Mar 2025Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill (Twenty First sitting)

The hon. Gentleman accurately points out that doctors are not social workers or psychiatrists, and we are asking them to make a difficult judgment, in consultation with the patient, about whether they should engage wider family in the discussion. That goes to the broader point: we are imposing a huge obligation on doct

healthsocial-care
108
11 Mar 2025Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill (Twenty First sitting)

As ever, the hon. Gentleman speaks very powerfully. Does he acknowledge that under the amendments, and under the Bill, it would be possible for a patient to proceed without informing their wider family, if they and the doctor conclude that it is not appropriate or necessary? The value of the amendments is that they wou

healthsocial-care
80
11 Mar 2025Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill (Twenty First sitting)

I am afraid there is a huge degree of subjectivity throughout the Bill, and we are putting an enormous obligation on doctors to use their best judgment. However, I think it is right to stipulate more clearly that it is appropriate, in general, to inform patients’ families. Leaving the vague term “appropriate” essential

healthsocial-care
1,212
11 Mar 2025Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill (Twenty First sitting)

Amendments 307 and 308 concern the question of who should be informed when an application has been made or when an assisted death has been approved, and at what stage it is appropriate for family members or next of kin to be informed. During the debate on clause 8, we discussed whether a patient should be asked to stat

healthsocial-care
340
11 Mar 2025Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill (Twenty First sitting)

I beg to move amendment 307, in clause 9, page 6, line 18, leave out from beginning to “advise” and insert “unless the assessing doctor has concluded in good faith, that this would not be in the person’s best interests.” This amendment would require the assessing doctor to inform the person’s next of kin that the perso

healthsocial-care
75
11 Mar 2025Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill (Twenty First sitting)

I am afraid that the waters are pretty muddied by the Bill. It states a direct contradiction of the Hippocratic oath, which requires doctors to save people’s lives and do nothing to bring about their death—including giving them lethal drugs. It is right there in the Hippocratic oath. There is obviously a real challenge

healthsocial-care
112
11 Mar 2025Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill (Twenty First sitting)

The hon. Gentleman puts his finger on a key point. The hon. Member for Bradford West is absolutely right: surely the hon. Gentleman acknowledges that there is a difference between allowing somebody to die and giving them lethal drugs that make them die. I am sure he would acknowledge the practical, if not the moral, di

healthsocial-care
86
11 Mar 2025Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill (Twenty First sitting)

rose—

healthsocial-care
1
11 Mar 2025Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill (Twenty First sitting)

We might appear to be dancing on a pinhead, but this goes to the heart of the question about what on earth we do in the event of complications. As the hon. Member for Spen Valley says, the Bill as drafted says that discussions should be had about wishes in the event of complications. That might simply be, “Do you want

healthsocial-care
155
11 Mar 2025Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill (Twenty First sitting)

I am grateful to the hon. Member for his intervention. Amendment 306, tabled by the hon. Member for York Central, addresses the question of what to do in the event of complications. I recognise that clause 9 states that that must be discussed, which I welcome. I think, though, that there is a significant absence that t

healthsocial-care
624
11 Mar 2025Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill (Twenty First sitting)

I am afraid to say that the whole debate about assisted dying is replete with scare stories. The hon. Gentleman says that they are descriptions of horrible events, but that is the situation that we are dealing with. We are here to try to pass legislation that is designed to avert horrible deaths. I am absolutely commit

healthsocial-care
156
11 Mar 2025Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill (Twenty First sitting)

Let us not rehash the conversations that we had in the evidence sessions, but I would advise Members to review those conversations. Indeed, there is further publicly available evidence, which I am happy to share, of the problems with data collection in Australia, as in other countries. To the point of the hon. Member f

healthsocial-care
643
← PreviousPage 24 of 45 · click a debate to open the transcript with this MP’s speeches highlightedNext →
Sources
SourceHansard · official report
MethodEach row is one contribution (intervention or speech). Word count from the official text.