The Westminster lensArchive · §02 Speeches · 881 contributions

Speeches by Kruger.

Every Hansard contribution by Danny Kruger this parliament, most recent first. Back to the MP page for the headline figures and analysed positions.

Showing 421440 of 881 contributions · most-recent first

← PreviousPage 22 of 45Next →
DateDebate & contributionWords
12 Mar 2025Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill (Twenty-third sitting)

I appreciate that an impact assessment is due to come later, after we have debated whether we should have this system or not. Nevertheless, will the Minister tell the Committee whether officials in her Department or in the Department of Health and Social Care have informed the hon. Member for Spen Valley whether the wo

healthsocial-care
170
12 Mar 2025Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill (Twenty-third sitting)

I will be voting for clause 12 to stand part, because I think it is an essential safeguard, but it is not strong enough. There are all sorts of problems with it around capacity and the way it is constituted, and I will come on now to how I think it can be improved.

healthsocial-care
54
12 Mar 2025Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill (Twenty-third sitting)

I am sorry to report that my mother could not hear a word of the proceedings. I am exaggerating, but she grumbled about the mumbling, which is a lesson for us all.

healthsocial-care
32
12 Mar 2025Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill (Twenty-third sitting)

I would be grateful for the Minister’s advice on whether she thinks a family member will always have standing. I appreciate her point that it will be for the panel to consider, but is it her view that in law, as in our experience, family members, in the normal understanding of the term—again, we are conscious of the de

healthsocial-care
88
12 Mar 2025Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill (Twenty-second sitting)

The scenario that my right hon. Friend the Member for North West Hampshire suggests implies that the patient has no faith in the panel. The patient would be concluding that they did not want to go through the formal process for an assisted death and explain it to their relatives, because they fear that the panel’s deci

healthsocial-care
143
12 Mar 2025Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill (Twenty-third sitting)

I am sorry; I did not intend to give that impression. That is not what I am suggesting. What I am saying is that we have seen the rejection of a series of amendments that would have restricted eligibility, or ensured that only certain people would be eligible: those for whom we all understand the reason for the case fo

healthsocial-care
337
12 Mar 2025Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill (Twenty-second sitting)

This is a very helpful exchange, for which I am grateful to my hon. Friend. In response to the hon. Member for Rother Valley, does my hon. Friend agree that although there should be an obligation to help the decision maker to conclude as to whether the eligibility criteria have been properly met, there is no best-inter

healthsocial-care
116
12 Mar 2025Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill (Twenty-second sitting)

Before the hon. Gentleman moves on, I want to reiterate the value of his point. This is an enormous change to the Bill and totally transforms it, but we did not have the opportunity to hear evidence on it. Is he also aware that many of the distinguished people who gave evidence against the traditional stage, which has

healthsocial-care
105
12 Mar 2025Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill (Twenty-second sitting)

It was helpful to hear the Bill’s promoter suggest that the system will be inquisitorial—that is not sufficiently apparent in the new clause, as my hon. Friend the Member for Reigate says. Does she agree that the panel must therefore have proper inquisitorial powers and authority? At the moment, there is a lack of genu

healthsocial-care
78
12 Mar 2025Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill (Twenty-third sitting)

I greatly respect the position that the hon. Lady has come to. She has been persuaded that this is an improvement on the Bill, and I respect that. I recognise that that is what the hon. Member for Spen Valley and others think, but I am afraid I do not accept that the process has been adequate. The hon. Member for Penis

healthsocial-care
172
12 Mar 2025Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill (Twenty-second sitting)

I would be grateful if the hon. Gentleman could explain that. If his concern is about asking patients to go through a third stage, after the doctor’s assessment—

healthsocial-care
28
12 Mar 2025Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill (Twenty-second sitting)

Is the hon. Gentleman not making a case against a third stage altogether?

healthsocial-care
13
12 Mar 2025Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill (Twenty-second sitting)

The hon. Gentleman has explained clearly in personal terms why it is important to involve the family, and I concur with the hon. Member for Richmond Park. I want to take the hon. Gentleman back to the rather abstract question of whether there are two sides to these cases. In contradiction to the hon. Member for Spen Va

healthsocial-care
152
12 Mar 2025Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill (Twenty-third sitting)

Of course that is correct: a small number of amendments will be selected for debate and vote on Report, and if somebody wants to table an amendment on this issue it might indeed make it through Mr Speaker’s selection, but the point of the Committee process is to consider the Bill that was passed on Second Reading and c

healthsocial-care
102
11 Mar 2025Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill (Twenty First sitting)

I beg to ask leave to withdraw the amendment. Amendment, by leave, withdrawn. Amendments made: 423, in clause 9, page 6, line 20, at end insert— “(2A) To inform their assessment, the assessing doctor must— (a) consider whether they should consult a health professional or social care professional with qualifications in,

healthsocial-care
427
11 Mar 2025Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill (Twenty First sitting)

rose—

healthsocial-care
1
11 Mar 2025Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill (Twenty First sitting)

The hon. Gentleman accurately points out that doctors are not social workers or psychiatrists, and we are asking them to make a difficult judgment, in consultation with the patient, about whether they should engage wider family in the discussion. That goes to the broader point: we are imposing a huge obligation on doct

healthsocial-care
108
11 Mar 2025Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill (Twenty First sitting)

This is a very important point, and I am grateful for the hon. Member for Spen Valley’s admission that this is not a judicial process. We have constantly been told that the Bill has been gold-plated with the judicial stage of the application process, but we have now heard that there is not a judicial stage. We have als

healthsocial-care
114
11 Mar 2025Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill (Twenty First sitting)

I beg to move amendment 432, in clause 12, page 8, line 31, leave out paragraph (a). This amendment is linked to amendments which remove proxies from the Bill.

healthsocial-care
29
11 Mar 2025Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill (Twenty First sitting)

Those might be appropriate reasons; I hope that can be specified. The crucial thing is that if there is an unwillingness—not an incapacity but an unwillingness—to proceed, that is of some concern. It is not that they are no longer able to do it—possibly for the reasons that the hon. Lady suggested—but if there is an ac

healthsocial-care
176
← PreviousPage 22 of 45 · click a debate to open the transcript with this MP’s speeches highlightedNext →
Sources
SourceHansard · official report
MethodEach row is one contribution (intervention or speech). Word count from the official text.