The Westminster lensArchive · §02 Speeches · 2,063 contributions

Speeches by Bryant.

Every Hansard contribution by Chris Bryant this parliament, most recent first. Back to the MP page for the headline figures and analysed positions.

Showing 1,5811,600 of 2,063 contributions · most-recent first

← PreviousPage 80 of 104Next →
DateDebate & contributionWords
4 Mar 2025Data (Use and Access) Bill [ Lords ] (First sitting)

No, they don’t.

technologyeconomy-jobs
3
4 Mar 2025Data (Use and Access) Bill [ Lords ] (First sitting)

We will be talking about clauses 28 to 31, but now I will speak to Government amendment 10 to clause 28, along with Government amendment 11. Several Members may wish to speak to this issue. Government amendment 10 removes subsections (3) and (4) of clause 28, which were added on Report in the House of Lords. The subsec

technologyeconomy-jobs
167
4 Mar 2025Data (Use and Access) Bill [ Lords ] (Second sitting)

In essence, the clause requires a consultation to be undertaken before or after the Bill is passed. It will help the Department to understand stakeholders’ needs and requirements, ensuring their support and the sustainability of NUAR as a service.

technologyutilitieslocal-government
39
4 Mar 2025Data (Use and Access) Bill [ Lords ] (First sitting)

I beg to move amendment 10, in clause 28, page 30, line 32, leave out subsections (3) and (4). This amendment removes subsections which were inserted at Report stage in the Lords.

technologyeconomy-jobs
32
4 Mar 2025Data (Use and Access) Bill [ Lords ] (First sitting)

Even without inspiration, I agree with everything the hon. Lady said. I would add the fact that to park a car in lots of places in the country now we have to go online using a smartphone. When I was in Cardiff recently, the sign said “Go to the app”, but it did not say which app. What frustrates me is that every local

technologyeconomy-jobs
226
4 Mar 2025Data (Use and Access) Bill [ Lords ] (Second sitting)

Sorry, the hon. Member will have to repeat that question. I did not hear it, I am afraid.

technologyutilitieslocal-government
18
4 Mar 2025Data (Use and Access) Bill [ Lords ] (Second sitting)

I will have to write to the hon. Member on whether we will consult on those measures specifically. They are certainly being considered by us, but that is a different matter. Question put and agreed to. Clause 60 accordingly ordered to stand part of the Bill. Clause 61 Form in which registers of births and deaths are to

technologyutilitieslocal-government
70
4 Mar 2025Data (Use and Access) Bill [ Lords ] (Second sitting)

I will speak to clauses 61 to 65 and to schedule 3. As somebody who has written history books, I have always found it fascinating that it has taken us a very long time to update the system of registration of births and deaths in the United Kingdom. It was only in 1837 that mandatory, statutory provision for the registr

technologyutilitieslocal-government
170
4 Mar 2025Data (Use and Access) Bill [ Lords ] (Second sitting)

I was under the impression that all the clauses in this part were grouped. It might be convenient for the Committee if they were.

technologyutilitieslocal-government
24
4 Mar 2025Data (Use and Access) Bill [ Lords ] (Second sitting)

As I was saying, clause 63 inserts proposed new section 38B of the Births and Deaths Registration Act 1953, which enables the Minister to make regulations in relation to duties under the Act to sign the births or deaths register where electronic registers are kept. Regulations under that power will specify the requirem

technologyutilitieslocal-government
369
4 Mar 2025Data (Use and Access) Bill [ Lords ] (First sitting)

It is simply that there is no requirement for people to use a digital verification service to be able to secure the service that they want. Obviously, that is a key part of how local government or Government have to deliver their services. They have to think not only about the people who can use digital services, but a

technologyeconomy-jobs
266
4 Mar 2025Data (Use and Access) Bill [ Lords ] (First sitting)

I note the comments from the shadow Minister, and I am grateful for them. There is a fundamental flaw in the argument from the hon. Member for North Norfolk that this new clause was tabled in the House of Lords, because what he means is that it was lost in the House of Lords—the House of Lords did not bring it to us. T

technologyeconomy-jobs
598
4 Mar 2025Data (Use and Access) Bill [ Lords ] (First sitting)

Part 2 of the Bill is about digital verification services. Those are obviously a very important part of the Bill; they lay out how we want to move into a new era and they are essential to many businesses being able to deliver their services effectively. They are also important to the Government being able to deliver so

technologyeconomy-jobs
442
4 Mar 2025Data (Use and Access) Bill [ Lords ] (First sitting)

I thought that this discussion might take a little longer. Much as I am tempted to dally on clauses 25 and 26, clause 25 basically defines various terms used in part 1 of the Bill, and clause 26 provides an index of terms used in part 1, including those defined in clause 25, so I do not think my heart is in the busines

technologyeconomy-jobs
119
4 Mar 2025Data (Use and Access) Bill [ Lords ] (First sitting)

Clause 20 allows regulations to provide that the processing of information they require does not breach obligations of confidence or other restrictions on processing information. However, regulations cannot compel businesses to breach data protection legislation. This mirrors the approach taken towards pensions dashboa

technologyeconomy-jobs
338
4 Mar 2025Data (Use and Access) Bill [ Lords ] (Second sitting)

I should correct something I said earlier. I was getting my undertakers and contractors mixed up—I think too much vicarly talk had passed. On clause 56, I said that local authorities will have to pay only if they are a contractor, which is wrong. Undertakers will pay for the service, not contractors, but if a local aut

technologyutilitieslocal-government
81
4 Mar 2025Data (Use and Access) Bill [ Lords ] (First sitting)

As the hon. Gentleman says, these are technical changes, and sometimes we just have to go through it again and again to make sure that we have got things right. Amendment 4, for instance, was simply a matter of working out that the grammar did not really work. Sometimes, it is just a question of filleting, I am afraid,

technologyeconomy-jobs
258
4 Mar 2025Data (Use and Access) Bill [ Lords ] (First sitting)

Government amendment 1 amends clause 8(5) to reflect that the conditions relating to authorisation or approval of third-party recipients will not necessarily be imposed by the decision makers who carry out the authorisation or approval. Government amendments 2, 3 and 5 amend clause 8(10) to require or allow enforcers t

technologyeconomy-jobs
169
4 Mar 2025Data (Use and Access) Bill [ Lords ] (First sitting)

I beg to move amendment 1, in clause 8, page 12, line 18, leave out “imposed by a decision-maker” and insert “(referred to in sections 3(2) and 5(3))”. This amendment amends a reference to conditions for authorisation or approval to receive customer data or business data so as to reflect the fact that conditions will n

technologyeconomy-jobs
61
4 Mar 2025Data (Use and Access) Bill [ Lords ] (First sitting)

This clause allows regulations to require the creation of interface bodies. These bodies may provide facilities and services, set standards or make related arrangements for data sharing interfaces, including application programming interfaces. Regulations may require data holders or third-party recipients to set up and

technologyeconomy-jobs
239
← PreviousPage 80 of 104 · click a debate to open the transcript with this MP’s speeches highlightedNext →
Sources
SourceHansard · official report
MethodEach row is one contribution (intervention or speech). Word count from the official text.