The Westminster lensArchive · §02 Speeches · 413 contributions

Speeches by Spencer.

Every Hansard contribution by Ben Spencer this parliament, most recent first. Back to the MP page for the headline figures and analysed positions.

Showing 321340 of 413 contributions · most-recent first

← PreviousPage 17 of 21Next →
DateDebate & contributionWords
11 Mar 2025Data (Use and Access) Bill [ Lords ] (Third sitting)

This is a really interesting set of clauses. The debate that we are having, and that they had in the other place, on automated decision making is particularly interesting. Of course, automated decision making is here. It is everywhere in every part of our lives. I was just looking at the Spotify app on my phone, and my

technologyhealth
97
11 Mar 2025Data (Use and Access) Bill [ Lords ] (Third sitting)

The matter turns on how we define public interest. I appreciate the concerns about the clause. Being a scientific purist, I could argue that even blue-sky research could be justified as in the public interest, provided that we all benefit from the fruits of that knowledge when it is shared. Notwithstanding that point,

technologyhealth
105
11 Mar 2025Data (Use and Access) Bill [ Lords ] (Third sitting)

The Minister says that the changes in the clause narrow the scientific test. That certainly was not my understanding and I would be grateful if he could clarify. Currently, under scientific research, only three criteria can be used under GDPR: statistical purposes, archiving, and genealogical-type purposes. The clause

technologyhealth
56
11 Mar 2025Data (Use and Access) Bill [ Lords ] (Third sitting)

I listened carefully to the Minister’s remarks on the Government’s position on the public interest test, which was extensively debated in the other place. I have a great deal of sympathy with what their lordships were trying to achieve in parts of that amendment. We are talking about the secondary use of data for scien

technologyhealth
428
11 Mar 2025Data (Use and Access) Bill [ Lords ] (Third sitting)

It is a pleasure to serve under your chairmanship again, Mr Turner. This part of the Bill relates to GDPR. Although there are some amendments that we will debate later, it makes sensible and long-overdue clarifications with regard to GDPR and the interaction with data protection, particularly through some updates to th

technologyhealth
95
7 Mar 2025Protection of Children (Digital Safety and Data Protection) Bill

It is a pleasure to speak on behalf of His Majesty’s official Opposition on this important topic. Thank you for calling me now, Madam Deputy Speaker; I will not speak for too long, because there are so many Government Members who are keen to take part in this important debate. I congratulate the hon. Member for Whiteha

technologyhealtheducation
397
7 Mar 2025Protection of Children (Digital Safety and Data Protection) Bill

I will come on to that a little later in my speech. Perhaps Government Members will have the chance to express their view on this matter on Report of the Children’s Wellbeing and Schools Bill in a couple of weeks’ time. Turning back to the research, a longitudinal study in the US of more than 6,500 children aged betwee

technologyhealtheducation
523
7 Mar 2025Protection of Children (Digital Safety and Data Protection) Bill

I am going to resist the temptation to be drawn into a discussion about research methodology in this area, although I have to tell the hon. Gentleman that I am very tempted to talk about the importance of case series data and qualitative data in terms of what people are telling us and what we are seeing ourselves, comp

technologyhealtheducation
277
4 Mar 2025Data (Use and Access) Bill [ Lords ] (Second sitting)

No worries. The Minister has tempted me to ask whether, as part of the consultation that is being put forward, cyber-security measures will be considered and consulted on.

technologyutilitieslocal-government
28
4 Mar 2025Data (Use and Access) Bill [ Lords ] (Second sitting)

I have to go back to the previous point again. Will cyber-security measures be covered as part of the consultation?

technologyutilitieslocal-government
20
4 Mar 2025Data (Use and Access) Bill [ Lords ] (Second sitting)

Is that a cyber-security vulnerability the Minister has just disclosed to the Committee?

technologyutilitieslocal-government
13
4 Mar 2025Data (Use and Access) Bill [ Lords ] (Second sitting)

I am not convinced that the clause is ambiguous. In the absence of a counter-amendment or a commitment from the Minister to bring something to the Committee to achieve the enhanced security in this area that we all want, we oppose the Government amendment. Question put, That the amendment be made.

technologyutilitieslocal-government
51
4 Mar 2025Data (Use and Access) Bill [ Lords ] (Second sitting)

Notwithstanding the question that the Minister has just posed, we are speaking in parallel lines. The purpose of the provision is to ensure that adequate cyber-security measures are taken up and accessed by parties. Security around the NUAR is one thing; there is also the question of security around the relevant stakeh

technologyutilitieslocal-government
109
4 Mar 2025Data (Use and Access) Bill [ Lords ] (Second sitting)

I think the Minister entirely appreciates where we are going, why the amendment has been put on the boards and why there is a desire for something like it in the Bill. Will he put forward a counter-amendment to satisfy that desire?

technologyutilitieslocal-government
42
4 Mar 2025Data (Use and Access) Bill [ Lords ] (Second sitting)

It is a pleasure to serve under your chairmanship, Ms Hobhouse. The national underground asset register is clearly important. The benefits of trusted partners having access to the information held in this critical infrastructure are plain to see, and I am glad that this provision is in the latest iteration of the Bill.

technologyutilitieslocal-government
273
4 Mar 2025Data (Use and Access) Bill [ Lords ] (First sitting)

Will the code of practice include information on the proportionate disclosure of data through the DVS scheme?

technologyeconomy-jobs
17
4 Mar 2025Data (Use and Access) Bill [ Lords ] (First sitting)

I am not going to rehash the previous debates. Clearly, the Committee has made its decision, no matter how disappointing that is. I just wanted to pick up the Minister’s previous point about the use of common sense in arbitration decisions when it comes to access to protected same-sex spaces. I fully support using comm

technologyeconomy-jobs
104
4 Mar 2025Data (Use and Access) Bill [ Lords ] (First sitting)

What is the point of politics if we do not have a debate? We strongly disagree with the interpretation that the provisions are somehow incompatible with ECHR rights. They totally support people’s privacy rights under article 8 regarding proportionate disclosures. If somebody needs to have someone’s sex data, they need

technologyeconomy-jobs
81
4 Mar 2025Data (Use and Access) Bill [ Lords ] (First sitting)

Amendments 10 and 11 seek to remove certain provisions that were introduced in Committee in the other place. I thank Sex Matters for its work, but also many people in this policy area who have tried to focus on the importance of data accuracy and validity when it is used. I hope we all agree that it is important that d

technologyeconomy-jobs
675
4 Mar 2025Data (Use and Access) Bill [ Lords ] (First sitting)

Digital verification services are important, and will make a big change when rolled out as part of this legislation. The provision is entirely right, particularly on the proportionality of data disclosure. Reading through some of the various reports and briefings we have received, the example used is of someone going i

technologyeconomy-jobs
238
← PreviousPage 17 of 21 · click a debate to open the transcript with this MP’s speeches highlightedNext →
Sources
SourceHansard · official report
MethodEach row is one contribution (intervention or speech). Word count from the official text.