The Westminster lensArchive · §02 Speeches · 305 contributions

Speeches by Griffith.

Every Hansard contribution by Andrew Griffith this parliament, most recent first. Back to the MP page for the headline figures and analysed positions.

Showing 121140 of 305 contributions · most-recent first

← PreviousPage 7 of 16Next →
DateDebate & contributionWords
4 Nov 2025Supporting High Streets

I absolutely agree. We are all here individually today representing our fantastic constituencies, our wonderful high streets and our entrepreneurial businesses—those residents and constituents who seek to be employed and contribute to a growing part of our economy. That is why we in the Opposition are here to talk abou

economy-jobsfiscal-policylocal-government
72
4 Nov 2025Supporting High Streets

I am afraid that the hon. Gentleman must have overstayed oral questions to the Chancellor, because what we are doing in the Chamber now is celebrating, cherishing and supporting our high streets, not accusing businesses in our constituencies of tax evasion. However, I am sure he has impressed his Treasury colleagues, w

economy-jobsfiscal-policylocal-government
70
4 Nov 2025Supporting High Streets

So many family businesses will be devastated by the family business death tax introduced by the Labour party. We often hear about the plight of farmers and food producers, but family businesses are even more numerous. If you have survived Labour’s job tax, if you have survived Labour’s more than doubling of business ra

economy-jobsfiscal-policylocal-government
113
4 Nov 2025Supporting High Streets

I hope that the hon. Lady is rising to commit herself to repealing them too.

economy-jobsfiscal-policylocal-government
15
4 Nov 2025Supporting High Streets

That was a valiant attempt to return to past history, but on this side of the House we are looking forward. Our plan for the high street would remedy the damage that has been done not over past years but over past months, and even again this morning—the collapse in confidence caused by our Chancellor.

economy-jobsfiscal-policylocal-government
55
4 Nov 2025Supporting High Streets

I enjoy a full English as much as I suspect my colleague does. It is not just breakfast that is under threat; it is also lunch, supper, tea, dinner and the great British pub.

economy-jobsfiscal-policylocal-government
34
4 Nov 2025Supporting High Streets

My right hon. Friend has made exactly the right point. It is genuinely bewildering—and we will see this again tomorrow—that when every single major business group in the country urges the Government not to proceed with their damaging unemployment Bill, when Labour think-tanks urge them not to proceed with that Bill, an

economy-jobsfiscal-policylocal-government
83
4 Nov 2025Supporting High Streets

I will make some progress. We have talked about the damage being done by the Chancellor, and we have talked about business rates and our plan to reform them and give the high street a chance, but there is more. Our cheap power plan will cut energy bills by 20%, with the average restaurant saving a very real £5,000 and

economy-jobsfiscal-policylocal-government
264
4 Nov 2025Supporting High Streets

You do not improve workers’ rights by making them unemployed, creating a generation of jobless young people who cannot find their way into gainful employment. And do you know what? It is not just the Conservatives who are saying that. Even that finishing school for socialists, the Resolution Foundation, opposes Labour’

economy-jobsfiscal-policylocal-government
138
4 Nov 2025Supporting High Streets

I beg to move, That this House calls on the Government to support high streets by cutting public expenditure to facilitate the abolition of business rates for thousands of retail, hospitality and leisure premises on the high street; and further calls on the Government not to proceed with the Employment Rights Bill to a

economy-jobsfiscal-policylocal-government
322
4 Nov 2025Supporting High Streets

My right hon. Friend represents his constituents in Salisbury diligently, and makes exactly the same point. With respect, the Government have not understood business, and the Treasury did not pause to consider, or to conduct an impact assessment. In particular, the capricious change in thresholds from £9,100 down to £5

economy-jobsfiscal-policylocal-government
72
30 Oct 2025Topical Questions

I will save time, Mr Speaker, by not mentioning the 13 leading business organisations that have all called for certainty now—not well-intentioned future consultations on implementation, but certainty now, because jobs and the economy are bleeding out. The Secretary of State will know that even the Resolution Foundation

economy-jobslabour-marketenergy
70
30 Oct 2025Topical Questions

I welcome the team to their significant roles for the United Kingdom. This week, the other place voted for five reasonable amendments to the Employment Rights Bill, representing a meaningful compromise with cross-party support to mitigate some of the worst of the damage caused by the Bill. As the Office for Budget Resp

economy-jobslabour-marketenergy
102
14 Sept 2025 Employment Rights Bill

My right hon. Friend, with his experience, is exactly right. Just think about the impact on a small business of a fee of that magnitude and the length of time it takes to get justice. What is going to happen? This is a really important point. Those on the Government Benches will be living this reality over the remainde

economy-jobssocial-care
460
14 Sept 2025 Employment Rights Bill

The shadow Minister absolutely understands that. He does so and understands the implication of clause 23 from having spoken to Make UK, the CBI, the Institute of Directors, the British Chambers of Commerce and the Federation of Small Businesses, all of whom urge the Government to rethink on this clause. Business does n

economy-jobssocial-care
91
14 Sept 2025 Employment Rights Bill

Of course not all dismissals are unfair, but if it was not a process that ended up in court or in a tribunal, we would not be facing a backlog of 491,000 individuals with current open cases—by the Government’s own figures—and business organisations would not be citing legal fees in that order of magnitude.

economy-jobssocial-care
54
14 Sept 2025 Employment Rights Bill

I will happily give way if the hon. Gentleman will talk about the other organisations that will do a brilliant job of representing employees.

economy-jobssocial-care
24
14 Sept 2025 Employment Rights Bill

The hon. Member has probably wilfully misinterpreted what I said. I am talking about the right for individuals to be represented by a trade union or by a qualified professional from another domain, such as a qualified lawyer.

economy-jobssocial-care
38
14 Sept 2025 Employment Rights Bill

Of course I will give way to the hon. Gentleman—we are missing him already.

economy-jobssocial-care
14
14 Sept 2025 Employment Rights Bill

The hon. Member has done a great deal of work on the Bill, and it is a great shame that he was cut short in his prime, but with respect the point is about choice for the individual. In many cases, the long-standing right will be to be represented by a trade union, but it could also be a mediator or a qualified professi

economy-jobssocial-care
668
← PreviousPage 7 of 16 · click a debate to open the transcript with this MP’s speeches highlightedNext →
Sources
SourceHansard · official report
MethodEach row is one contribution (intervention or speech). Word count from the official text.