The Westminster lensArchive · §02 Speeches · 680 contributions

Speeches by George.

Every Hansard contribution by Andrew George this parliament, most recent first. Back to the MP page for the headline figures and analysed positions.

Showing 181200 of 680 contributions · most-recent first

← PreviousPage 10 of 34Next →
DateDebate & contributionWords
21 Jan 2026Health and Social Care Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 1611)

I have one final question on this. In your risk register, the risk of delay and omission is given the red rank. What types of omissions are you concerned may be made, and how has the Department responded to your concerns?

41
21 Jan 2026Health and Social Care Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 1611)

To go back to the nuts and bolts, you are halfway through the transition period for registration. How is that going? Do you know what population is likely to register and what proportion of them have registered so far?

39
21 Jan 2026Health and Social Care Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 1611)

Okay, but that has happened on your watch. There is still controversy and anxiety, so do you not think you owe it to the industry—to those who are regulated by you—to acknowledge that you perhaps could have done more, to apologise, and to say that you have a role in repairing those relationships going forward?

55
21 Jan 2026Health and Social Care Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 1611)

But isn’t it really a known unknown? Someone knows, and that is presumably the employers at the local level. Surely it is not beyond the wit of any man or woman to corral that data pretty quickly.

37
21 Jan 2026Health and Social Care Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 1611)

What can you say to reassure us that you are having those conversations, and that you are not just saying there are conversations behind closed doors where we are supposed to imagine what they are?

35
21 Jan 2026Health and Social Care Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 1611)

If that is the case, there is no need for delay, is there? If you think the majority are registered, presumably the nomenclature issue is no reason why you cannot start referring—

32
21 Jan 2026Health and Social Care Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 1611)

Okay. In terms of parallels with the nursing profession, how do you think that is proceeding? Do you share notes with the NMC?

23
21 Jan 2026Health and Social Care Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 1611)

But you have responsibility to ensure patient safety—that is fundamental to your purpose. Surely it is your role both to inform the Government and to respond back to NHS providers in circumstances where patients are being put in danger as a result of decisions about the skills mix and staffing levels operating within t

55
21 Jan 2026Health and Social Care Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 1611)

But part of the evidence base is the controversy, anxiety and the turf wars going on between professions for which you, as the GMC, are responsible for regulating. Surely that is very much the focus of your responsibility.

38
21 Jan 2026Health and Social Care Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 1611)

And you could call them assistants rather than associates—there is nothing stopping you, but you are saying that in law you cannot.

22
14 Jan 2026 Horse and Rider Road Safety

As my hon. Friend knows, I strongly support his proposed legislation; indeed, I am a sponsor of it. Does he agree that, in order to advance new regulations, the Government need to review whether there is sufficient bridleway capacity across the countryside to avoid the necessity of using roads? It is clear that there a

transportculture-community
75
13 Jan 2026Storm Goretti

(Urgent Question): To ask the Chancellor of the Duchy of Lancaster if he will make a statement following Storm Goretti.

utilitiesenvironmentlocal-government
20
13 Jan 2026Storm Goretti

I thank the Minister for his reply. He has described the impact that the storm has had on our communities. As he rightly says, west Cornwall and the Isles of Scilly took the brunt of the storm, but it nevertheless had a devastating effect throughout Cornwall, south-west England and beyond. Nursing home patients were ev

utilitiesenvironmentlocal-government
353
7 Jan 2026Health and Social Care Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 632)

We all agree that it is better to shift from hospital to community. People want to be treated closer to home, not further from home. But the expert panel found that it would be completely inappropriate to shift the burden of palliative care into the community unless sufficient planning and resources were in place. You

85
7 Jan 2026Health and Social Care Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 632)

As well as the patient, there is also the family around them in the home. The expert panel identified that the value of unpaid carers is effectively about £29 billion, in terms of supporting those in need of end-of-life and palliative care. Is that going to be part of your MSF? Is your MSF going to be integrated with o

90
7 Jan 2026Health and Social Care Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 632)

That seems to be contrary to—

6
7 Jan 2026Health and Social Care Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 632)

Right.

1
7 Jan 2026Health and Social Care Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 632)

Looking more widely, I think the patient and family point of view is, yes, shift out to the community, but to a certain extent there is a fear of out of sight, out of mind, and they would feel safer in the hospital. There is not the 24/7 access to medication, advice and specialist palliative care when needed. Therefore

87
7 Jan 2026Health and Social Care Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 632)

You mean there is a gradual diminution of numbers and proportions that are admitted.

14
7 Jan 2026Health and Social Care Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 632)

Okay. The question was about the integration, rather than the funding.

11
← PreviousPage 10 of 34 · click a debate to open the transcript with this MP’s speeches highlightedNext →
Sources
SourceHansard · official report
MethodEach row is one contribution (intervention or speech). Word count from the official text.