The Westminster lensArchive · §02 Speeches · 820 contributions

Speeches by Norris.

Every Hansard contribution by Alex Norris this parliament, most recent first. Back to the MP page for the headline figures and analysed positions.

Showing 221240 of 820 contributions · most-recent first

← PreviousPage 12 of 41Next →
DateDebate & contributionWords
9 Jun 2026Home Affairs Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 38)

I know that that knocked around. That is nothing that I ever said in those conversations. I would not routinely do that at any part of our estate because clearly there is a cohesion risk around doing that. Do you think that is wrong, Mr Maguire? Am I wrong in doing that?

52
9 Jun 2026Home Affairs Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 38)

We do not have, certainly in my time in the Home Office, many comparable decisions but, yes, absolutely, this was totally the right decision.

24
9 Jun 2026Home Affairs Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 38)

Yes, we believe it is the right thing to do. I appreciate—

12
9 Jun 2026Home Affairs Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 38)

Yes, we have to be careful. Again, I make no criticism of certainly the individuals that I engage with from Wealden district council, who engage with me always in good faith, but you would expect, Mr Maguire, with any big organisation or anyone at all, we are cautious about information when it being the right informati

71
9 Jun 2026Home Affairs Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 38)

This is an important operational decision that takes into account the safety of staff, the local community and service users. We know it is our experience because we have a big supported population and we are well used to how they move around the system that there is a lot of interest in it, not always interest that is

117
9 Jun 2026Home Affairs Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 38)

The advice that is given to previous Ministers has firewalls. We know what announcements were made and perhaps decisions not taken, but I cannot tell you for definite what previous Ministers considered.

32
9 Jun 2026Home Affairs Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 38)

Yes, that is right.

4
9 Jun 2026Home Affairs Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 38)

We have spent £60,000 on the site so far.

9
9 Jun 2026Home Affairs Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 38)

I can speak only for our Government, but we announced it soon after my arrival at the Home Office and so you can be assured that it is been uppermost in our thoughts.

33
9 Jun 2026Home Affairs Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 38)

We have spent £60,000. That is right, Andrew?

8
9 Jun 2026Home Affairs Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 38)

That was a planning assumption. Again, from the correspondence, you have seen the date by which we started to have those conversations and it quickly became clear that this would be a problem.

33
9 Jun 2026Home Affairs Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 38)

It is the things I have said. It is the ability to operationalise them. It is their size. It is their availability. The MOD offered us Crowborough because it was not using it. Those types of things go into that equation and would do going forwards.

46
9 Jun 2026Home Affairs Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 38)

We did not think that it would be an issue in this way.

13
9 Jun 2026Home Affairs Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 38)

I would not be in a position to talk about what sites might be looked at in the future for the reasons I have discussed. It is important that the right information enters the public domain at the right time, but we are mindful. We have now the experience of this type of work in Scotland. Yes, of course, that is uppermo

65
9 Jun 2026Home Affairs Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 38)

As I say, there are not routinely hotels of that size. Again, I have to say that the nature of the provision is different, too, and so it behoves a slightly different categorisation.

33
9 Jun 2026Home Affairs Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 38)

It absolutely is because, as you say, the responsibilities that are devolved and planning legislation impacting against housing legislation has meant that we are in the current position that we are in. Yes, it is different.

36
9 Jun 2026Home Affairs Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 38)

No.

1
9 Jun 2026Home Affairs Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 38)

As you have heard, we are on a trajectory for 540. Wethersfield has more than that already with a surge capacity to go much more than that—

27
9 Jun 2026Home Affairs Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 38)

I have not an awful lot more than what is available. We would like to use it for this purpose. We are in disagreement with the local authority. Our position is, given that this was used for broadly the same purpose under Afghan resettlement, this planning ought not be an issue. Their view is that that is not the case a

110
9 Jun 2026Home Affairs Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 38)

Those decisions do take place already. If an individual has no other alternative, they tend to get overturned at tribunal, and we tend to re-house them. I do not think that is a particularly satisfactory status quo, but that is what would happen in those cases.

46
← PreviousPage 12 of 41 · click a debate to open the transcript with this MP’s speeches highlightedNext →
Sources
SourceHansard · official report
MethodEach row is one contribution (intervention or speech). Word count from the official text.