The Westminster lensArchive · §02 Speeches · 77 contributions

Speeches by Strickland.

Every Hansard contribution by Alan Strickland this parliament, most recent first. Back to the MP page for the headline figures and analysed positions.

Showing 120 of 77 contributions · most-recent first

Page 1 of 4Next →
DateDebate & contributionWords
22 Jun 2026Armed Forces Bill

It is apt that the House meets during Armed Forces Week to discuss this important Bill. I strongly welcome it, and commend Ministers past and present for using its passage to not just renew service law, which Parliament is required to do every five years, as hon. Members have said, but genuinely drive wider improvement

defencehousinglocal-government
1,705
17 Jun 2026National Security (State Threats) Bill

I strongly support the change to the law being proposed today, to better protect our nation and our fellow citizens from those working for foreign states that want to disrupt and attack our way of life. While there has been debate today about the timeline, I personally welcome the swift and decisive approach being take

defencecrimetechnology
1,020
8 Jun 2026 Steel Industry (Nationalisation) Bill

I am pleased to speak in support of the Bill and comment on a number of the amendments. I do so as a Member of this House who represents a proud manufacturing constituency, which includes a number of industries that rely on steel in a variety of ways, from the rail industry and advanced manufacturing to the cluster of

economy-jobsdefenceenvironment
600
8 Jun 2026 Steel Industry (Nationalisation) Bill

I think of comparisons from local government. When I was a cabinet member in charge of planning, housing and regeneration, we had a number of subsidiary companies as the council, but they had operational independence. We recruited the best people from the relevant sectors and did not interfere in the day-to-day operati

economy-jobsdefenceenvironment
77
8 Jun 2026 Steel Industry (Nationalisation) Bill

Octric, as the company is now called, has its own board and its own chief executive, recruited from industry, along with industry experts supporting it. It is of course supported by the Ministry of Defence, but it operates as a commercial concern—as a company in which the sole shareholder is the British Government. Tha

economy-jobsdefenceenvironment
119
8 Jun 2026 Steel Industry (Nationalisation) Bill

I am concerned that, given the importance of steel to defence and to our critical national infrastructure, forcing the publication of the details set out in new clause 5 could compromise our national security, given that we are talking about using steel for such vital purposes. I say respectfully to the hon. Member for

economy-jobsdefenceenvironment
111
8 Jun 2026 Steel Industry (Nationalisation) Bill

Ministers will speak for themselves, but I think they are seeking the flexibility to act in the national interest and to do so appropriately. My concern is more with some of the clauses that add lots of prerequisites to what needs to happen before Ministers can act. My view is that in the limited, and hopefully rare, c

economy-jobsdefenceenvironment
396
8 Jun 2026 Steel Industry (Nationalisation) Bill

The Bill deals with serious and crucial issues—not just for our national economy but, as Members have said, for many of the constituencies represented by right hon. and hon. Members present, and it deserves to be taken seriously.

economy-jobsdefenceenvironment
38
8 Jun 2026 Steel Industry (Nationalisation) Bill

I have a broader point about not only the new clause but some of the wider discussion of the Bill. At the heart of new clause 5 sits a slight misunderstanding of what nationalisation means. To give a local example, I was proud to work with the Defence Secretary to secure the nationalisation—or the “strategic acquisitio

economy-jobsdefenceenvironment
109
8 Jun 2026 Steel Industry (Nationalisation) Bill

Secondly, a number of the amendments seek clarity on transparency or accountability, on which Members rightly want reassurance. I have expressed concerns that the commercial reality of the company operating would mean that some steps just would not be appropriate, reasonable or helpful, and could slow things down. But

economy-jobsdefenceenvironment
98
8 Jun 2026 Steel Industry (Nationalisation) Bill

Finally, the hon. Member for Richmond Park (Sarah Olney) tabled new clause 3, on jobs and the industrial strategy transition. I will not get into the specifics of the new clause, but it flags up an important point about how Ministers will ensure that any acquisition of a plant will deliver social value, including jobs,

economy-jobsdefenceenvironment
60
8 Jun 2026 Steel Industry (Nationalisation) Bill

I have been very pleased recently to meet the new apprentices at the semiconductor plant in my constituency that, as I mentioned, was acquired by the Ministry of Defence, and have seen for myself how that Government intervention is delivering wider value to the community. A new apprenticeship programme has been establi

economy-jobsdefenceenvironment
119
8 Jun 2026 Steel Industry (Nationalisation) Bill

To conclude, I support the Government’s approach to the Bill and have been happy to set out some of my thoughts on the amendments from across the Committee. Given the importance of steel, it is entirely right that the Bill seeks to move us to a more proactive position and to give Ministers more options to act in the na

economy-jobsdefenceenvironment
89
8 Jun 2026 Steel Industry (Nationalisation) Bill

A modern, dynamic, future-facing steel industry is critical to the Government’s ambitions for industry and modern industry. As we have heard from Members across the Chamber, it is also crucial and central to the ambitions of many of the communities represented in this debate. I commend the Minister, with his significan

economy-jobsdefenceenvironment
60
8 Jun 2026 Steel Industry (Nationalisation) Bill

The second problem with Reform’s new clause 5 is that it misses the point of the Bill. This Bill is not about a national strategy on steel—one was published, as I have just mentioned. The proposed law before us deals with specific questions of ownership and with Government intervention in specific steel undertakings. M

economy-jobsdefenceenvironment
131
8 Jun 2026 Steel Industry (Nationalisation) Bill

Before I finish, I have three issues that I would like the Minister to address, if he could, when he responds to the debate. First, we need to bring clarity to what nationalisation would mean in this context. My understanding is that were British Steel to be nationalised, it would effectively remain a private company,

economy-jobsdefenceenvironment
110
13 Apr 2026 North Atlantic Submarine Activity

It was a privilege recently to spend a week at Camp Viking with our Royal Marines, seeing at first hand the work they are doing to defend the High North. Does the Minister agree that it is clear strategically that the security of the High North and of the north Atlantic are intrinsically linked because of the sea lanes

defenceenergy
119
16 Mar 2026Topical Questions

T4. Having worked with the Defence Secretary to save the semiconductor plant in Newton Aycliffe in my constituency, I was proud the other week to meet Sam and Evan, two new apprentices who owe their opportunities directly to Government investment—but we want to go further. Can Ministers confirm that the MOD will contin

defenceeconomy-jobsenergy
83
11 Mar 2026Royal Mail: Universal Service Obligation

I met a resident at my surgery at the weekend who has a long-term health condition. They have been sent testing packs by the NHS, which arrive late, and appointment letters have been delayed, which is having a huge impact on their health. When the Minister meets Ofcom later, will he raise the serious impacts of unaccep

utilitieslabour-marketeconomy-jobs
70
4 Feb 2026Engagements

Q9. It was a privilege to join fellow north-east MPs at the weekend on the destroyer HMS Duncan, to meet the crew and to be briefed on the exciting plans for the innovative future of the Royal Navy—a future that should be bright, given the £10 billion frigate deal with Norway, and a future that we absolutely want our r

crimedefencelocal-government
113
Page 1 of 4 · click a debate to open the transcript with this MP’s speeches highlightedNext →
Sources
SourceHansard · official report
MethodEach row is one contribution (intervention or speech). Word count from the official text.