The Westminster lensArchive · §02 Speeches · 1,065 contributions

Speeches by Carns.

Every Hansard contribution by Al Carns this parliament, most recent first. Back to the MP page for the headline figures and analysed positions.

Showing 401420 of 1,065 contributions · most-recent first

← PreviousPage 21 of 54Next →
DateDebate & contributionWords
16 Apr 2026Armed Forces Bill (Seventh sitting)

I commend the right hon. Gentleman’s comments. It is worth remembering that some of the more costly battles in war are maritime battles. Ships could sink within minutes, and although today there are fewer crew members on those ships, there were thousands on them back in the day, particularly with the Dreadnought class.

defencetechnologylabour-market
105
16 Apr 2026Armed Forces Bill (Seventh sitting)

I thank the right hon. Member for Rayleigh and Wickford for tabling new clause 16. The Defence Secretary has been really clear that we are working flat out to finalise the defence investment plan. I think it was a slip of the tongue that needs to be corrected in Hansard—

defencetechnologylabour-market
50
16 Apr 2026Armed Forces Bill (Seventh sitting)

I thank the right hon. Member for Rayleigh and Wickford for tabling new clauses 13 and 15. New clause 15 seeks to exempt members of the reserve forces deployed on operations from the European convention on human rights for that period of deployment. As the Committee will know, the UK has an international legal obligati

defencetechnologylabour-market
445
16 Apr 2026Armed Forces Bill (Seventh sitting)

I would like to correct Hansard, because I think there was a slip of the tongue when the right hon. Gentleman said “drip”, not “DIP”. There seems to be an element of dripping going on about the DIP. Well, for 14 years there has been a dip in morale, a dip in recruitment and retention, a dip in ship orders, a dip in air

defencetechnologylabour-market
128
16 Apr 2026Armed Forces Bill (Seventh sitting)

Well, I do apologise.

defencetechnologylabour-market
4
16 Apr 2026Armed Forces Bill (Seventh sitting)

The right hon. Gentleman left a massively hollowed-out and underfunded defence.

defencetechnologylabour-market
11
16 Apr 2026Armed Forces Bill (Seventh sitting)

No. The right hon. Gentleman can wait two minutes.

defencetechnologylabour-market
9
16 Apr 2026Armed Forces Bill (Seventh sitting)

The hon. Gentleman asks an impossible question. For example, there are sub-surface uncrewed systems, surface uncrewed systems, airborne uncrewed systems, airborne uncrewed systems that come off surface systems, and surface systems that deploy uncrewed below-surface systems. Trying to find an individual or body that wil

defencetechnologylabour-market
648
16 Apr 2026Armed Forces Bill (Seventh sitting)

No, no, no.

defencetechnologylabour-market
3
16 Apr 2026Armed Forces Bill (Seventh sitting)

First, to be absolutely clear, we are not blaming officials in any way, shape or form. What we are saying is that when the leadership is changed every 10 to 15 minutes, consistency in command and control will be lost. An individual who has such experience in command will know that, and the hon. Member knows—the Committ

defencetechnologylabour-market
203
16 Apr 2026Armed Forces Bill (Seventh sitting)

My hon. Friend highlights that this is not just a multifaceted problem within defence or the security architecture of the nation, but a consequence of what the broader Government inherited collectively. If not over 14 years, at least in the last four years, we saw Ministers change at such a fast rate, we ceded responsi

defencetechnologylabour-market
112
16 Apr 2026Armed Forces Bill (Seventh sitting)

The DIP will be an affordable, deliverable programme to transform our armed forces. I hope I have provided the necessary reassurance to the hon. Member and, on those grounds, I ask him not to press the new clause.

defencetechnologylabour-market
38
16 Apr 2026Armed Forces Bill (Seventh sitting)

Our aim is to ensure that the decisions in the plan are robust and support the development of current and future capabilities to help drive the transformation of the armed forces, as described in the strategic defence review. It will be an affordable, deliverable programme to transform our armed forces, and it will hig

defencetechnologylabour-market
127
16 Apr 2026Armed Forces Bill (Seventh sitting)

It has everything to do with it. The Committee needs to understand the details of what has been left, because it has everything to do with it. We cannot take anything in isolation; it is all combined. As a result, we have a deeply complex problem set to deal with.

defencetechnologylabour-market
50
16 Apr 2026Armed Forces Bill (Seventh sitting)

On a point of order, Mr Efford. I take this opportunity to thank all colleagues and all Opposition Members for our healthy and important debates. Importantly, I also thank all the Clerks, officials and you in the Chair, Mr Efford, for pulling the Committee together and making it run smoothly. It is not lost on me that

defencetechnologylabour-market
119
16 Apr 2026Armed Forces Bill (Seventh sitting)

Very kind. Question put, That the clause be read a Second time.

defencetechnologylabour-market
12
16 Apr 2026Armed Forces Bill (Seventh sitting)

I thank the right hon. Member for his views on the Bill and acknowledge his request for us to publish a defence readiness plan that must include information about the numbers and readiness of the reserve forces. One of the main reasons we are underinsured, underprepared and under attack is the systemic underfunding of

defencetechnologylabour-market
312
16 Apr 2026Armed Forces Bill (Seventh sitting)

The reality is that we are already spending. We have awarded more than 1,200 major contracts since the election. There is a £1 billion contract for military helicopters in Yeovil, £500 million has been invested in state-of-the-art British Typhoon jets, and there has been a £100 million boost for the RAF P-8 submarine-h

defencetechnologylabour-market
103
16 Apr 2026Armed Forces Bill (Seventh sitting)

I thank the right hon. Member for Rayleigh and Wickford for tabling the new clauses. The development, testing and use of uncrewed systems is vital to the UK’s defence. Not only have we seen uncrewed systems cause a significant number of casualties on the frontline in Ukraine, but we have seen their use in the Iranian c

defencetechnologylabour-market
495
16 Apr 2026Armed Forces Bill (Seventh sitting)

Clause 47 addresses the existing disparity between the protection of military aircraft and vessels under the Protection of Military Remains Act 1986, which secures the protection from unauthorised interference of the remains of military aircraft and vessels that have crashed, sunk or been stranded, and/or associated hu

defencetechnologylabour-market
330
← PreviousPage 21 of 54 · click a debate to open the transcript with this MP’s speeches highlightedNext →
Sources
SourceHansard · official report
MethodEach row is one contribution (intervention or speech). Word count from the official text.