Each row is one party. The bar shows how its MPs voted relative to a neutral midpoint — to the right = on-side with the majority position, to the left = opposed. The percentage figure is the share of that party’s MPs who took the same side: higher = more whip-disciplined, closer to 50% = a freer vote.
| Party | Stance vs neutral midpoint | Net % | Discipline | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Labour Party | Lab | -49 | 1% on-whip · 244 MPs | |
| Conservative and Unionist Party | Con | +50 | 100% on-whip · 99 MPs | |
| Labour and Co-operative Party | Lab | -50 | 0% on-whip · 31 MPs | |
| Democratic Unionist Party | DUP | +50 | 100% on-whip · 5 MPs | |
| Independent | Ind | +30 | 80% on-whip · 5 MPs | |
| Green Party of England and Wales | Grn | -50 | 0% on-whip · 5 MPs |
Source · Hansard · alignment is the share of party MPs who voted with the party majority on tagged divisions
| Date | Motion | Aye | No | Carried |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 23 Jun 2026 | Opposition Day: Puberty blockers Aye: Support the opposition motion on puberty blockers — likely backing tighter restrictions or a permanent ban on their use for under-18s with gender dysphoria · No: Oppose the opposition motion, reflecting either the government's resistance to opposition-set agendas or a different policy position on how puberty blocker regulation should be handled | 112 | 285 | No |
All 1 divisions on this issue →
Mapping each Westminster issue to the equivalent council service bucket (so “transgender-policy” → the matching service line on council finance, with the ranked-spend table this section wants) is its own taxonomy job. Council service spend lives on the council pages today; cross-cut by issue here in a follow-on pass.