Each row is one party. The bar shows how its MPs voted relative to a neutral midpoint — to the right = on-side with the majority position, to the left = opposed. The percentage figure is the share of that party’s MPs who took the same side: higher = more whip-disciplined, closer to 50% = a freer vote.
| Party | Stance vs neutral midpoint | Net % | Discipline | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Labour Party | Lab | -13 | 37% on-whip · 334 MPs | |
| Conservative and Unionist Party | Con | +17 | 67% on-whip · 105 MPs | |
| Liberal Democrats | LD | +10 | 60% on-whip · 64 MPs | |
| Labour and Co-operative Party | Lab | -12 | 38% on-whip · 41 MPs | |
| Scottish National Party | SNP | +50 | 100% on-whip · 6 MPs | |
| Independent | Ind | 0 | 50% on-whip · 6 MPs | |
| Green Party of England and Wales | Grn | -11 | 39% on-whip · 5 MPs | |
| Plaid Cymru | Plaid | -10 | 40% on-whip · 4 MPs |
Source · Hansard · alignment is the share of party MPs who voted with the party majority on tagged divisions
| Date | Motion | Aye | No | Carried |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6 Jul 2026 | National Security (State Threats) Bill: motion to agree to Lords Amendment 1 Aye: Support accepting the Lords' amendment to the National Security (State Threats) Bill · No: Oppose the Lords' amendment, preferring the Bill as it stood before the Lords changed it | 394 | 86 | Yes |
| 17 Jun 2026 | National Security (State Threats) Bill: Allocation of Time motion Aye: Support restricting the time available for debating the National Security (State Threats) Bill, accepting the government's proposed timetable. · No: Oppose the timetable restriction, arguing that a bill with significant national security and civil liberties implications deserves more parliamentary scrutiny time. | 235 | 96 | Yes |
| 17 Jun 2026 | National Security (State Threats) Bill Committee: New Clause 3 Aye: Support adding the new clause, which introduces oversight mechanisms but raises concerns it could restrict judicial review or court challenges to government decisions made under the legislation. · No: Oppose the new clause in its current form, likely on grounds that it inadequately protects access to justice or human rights safeguards against future government misuse. | 143 | 244 | No |
| 17 Jun 2026 | National Security (State Threats) Bill Committee: Amendment 8 Aye: Support Amendment 8 to the National Security (State Threats) Bill as tabled in Committee · No: Oppose Amendment 8, preferring the Bill to proceed without this change | 144 | 249 | No |
| 17 Jun 2026 | National Security (State Threats) Bill Committee: Amendment 13 Aye: Support Amendment 13 to the National Security (State Threats) Bill, the precise effect of which is not discernible from the available debate record · No: Oppose Amendment 13, likely reflecting the government's position that the Bill as drafted already strikes the right balance on security powers, oversight, and human rights compliance | 137 | 258 | No |
All 6 divisions on this issue →
By party, the MPs whose voting record on national security is most closely tracking the party majority. A fuller “most active by speech volume + written questions” ranking is pending — needs per-issue speech aggregation.
LabLabour Party
| MP | Constituency | % on-whip |
|---|---|---|
| Tonia Antoniazzi | Gower | 40% |
| Mary Kelly Foy | City of Durham | 40% |
| Sarah Owen | Luton North | 40% |
ConConservative and Unionist Party
| MP | Constituency | % on-whip |
|---|---|---|
| Karen Bradley | Staffordshire Moorlands | 100% |
| Tom Tugendhat | Tonbridge | 100% |
| John Whittingdale | Maldon | 80% |
LDLiberal Democrats
| MP | Constituency | % on-whip |
|---|---|---|
| Tessa Munt | Wells and Mendip Hills | 67% |
| Rachel Gilmour | Tiverton and Minehead | 67% |
| Charlie Maynard | Witney | 67% |
LabLabour and Co-operative Party
| MP | Constituency | % on-whip |
|---|---|---|
| Simon Lightwood | Wakefield and Rothwell | 40% |
| Kate Dearden | Halifax | 40% |
| Gareth Thomas | Harrow West | 33% |
IndIndependent
| MP | Constituency | % on-whip |
|---|---|---|
| Patrick Spencer | Central Suffolk and North Ipswich | 67% |
| Rosie Duffield | Canterbury | 67% |
| Joani Reid | East Kilbride and Strathaven | 33% |
Mapping each Westminster issue to the equivalent council service bucket (so “National Security” → the matching service line on council finance, with the ranked-spend table this section wants) is its own taxonomy job. Council service spend lives on the council pages today; cross-cut by issue here in a follow-on pass.