Each row is one party. The bar shows how its MPs voted relative to a neutral midpoint — to the right = on-side with the majority position, to the left = opposed. The percentage figure is the share of that party’s MPs who took the same side: higher = more whip-disciplined, closer to 50% = a freer vote.
| Party | Stance vs neutral midpoint | Net % | Discipline | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Conservative and Unionist Party | Con | +50 | 100% on-whip · 23 MPs | |
| Labour Party | Lab | -46 | 4% on-whip · 23 MPs | |
| Liberal Democrats | LD | -41 | 9% on-whip · 11 MPs |
Source · Hansard · alignment is the share of party MPs who voted with the party majority on tagged divisions
| Date | Motion | Aye | No | Carried |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 15 Jun 2026 | Royal Albert Hall Bill [Lords]: Revival Aye: Support reviving the Royal Albert Hall Bill to allow it to continue its parliamentary passage · No: Oppose reviving the Royal Albert Hall Bill, either on procedural grounds or due to substantive concerns about its content | 26 | 39 | No |
All 1 divisions on this issue →
Mapping each Westminster issue to the equivalent council service bucket (so “Heritage Preservation” → the matching service line on council finance, with the ranked-spend table this section wants) is its own taxonomy job. Council service spend lives on the council pages today; cross-cut by issue here in a follow-on pass.