Each row is one party. The bar shows how its MPs voted relative to a neutral midpoint — to the right = on-side with the majority position, to the left = opposed. The percentage figure is the share of that party’s MPs who took the same side: higher = more whip-disciplined, closer to 50% = a freer vote.
| Party | Stance vs neutral midpoint | Net % | Discipline | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Labour Party | Lab | +50 | 100% on-whip · 225 MPs | |
| Conservative and Unionist Party | Con | -50 | 0% on-whip · 80 MPs | |
| Labour and Co-operative Party | Ind | +50 | 100% on-whip · 26 MPs | |
| Independent | Ind | +17 | 67% on-whip · 6 MPs | |
| Green Party of England and Wales | Grn | +50 | 100% on-whip · 5 MPs |
Source · Hansard · alignment is the share of party MPs who voted with the party majority on tagged divisions
| Date | Motion | Aye | No | Carried |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 16 Jun 2026 | Draft Clean Air Zones Central Services (Fees) (England) (Amendment) Regulations 2026 Aye: Support extending and increasing the fee framework for clean air zone central services, backing cost recovery and the continued operation of clean air zones as a public health measure · No: Oppose the doubling of the transaction fee as disproportionate and potentially discouraging local authorities from operating clean air zones, with some also objecting to clean air zone charges on drivers of older vehicles more broadly | 263 | 88 | Yes |
All 1 divisions on this issue →
Mapping each Westminster issue to the equivalent council service bucket (so “air-quality” → the matching service line on council finance, with the ranked-spend table this section wants) is its own taxonomy job. Council service spend lives on the council pages today; cross-cut by issue here in a follow-on pass.