Inquiry · Opened 20 December 2024
Food supply chain resilience and fairness
From: Environment, Food and Rural Affairs Committee
What this inquiry is asking
Are the UK's food supply chain regulators—the Groceries Code Adjudicator (GCA) and the newly created Agricultural Supply Chain Adjudicator (ASCA)—actually protecting farmers and food suppliers from unfair treatment by dominant supermarkets and processors? The inquiry examines whether current regulatory tools and government policy adequately address the structural power imbalance that leaves farmers producing below cost while supermarkets extract record profits.
Status / emerging findings
- GCA has delivered only 3 formal investigations and 15 arbitrations in 13 years despite overseeing 97% of UK grocery sales; static £2 million budget has not kept pace with inflation or expanded remit
- GCA is funded by mandatory levy from the 14 designated supermarkets it regulates—supermarkets have never challenged funding levels, suggesting they may prefer an under-resourced regulator
- Farmers fear retaliation (delisting) for reporting GCA breaches and often spend £200,000+ in private legal costs before regulators engage; the Clappison case exemplified regulator abandonment until court intervention
- Top 10 supermarkets control 96.7% of grocery sales while some pay zero corporation tax; dairy farmers currently produce below cost of production despite 'fair dealing' obligations introduced by government
- ASCA is operational with only 4 full-time staff and has handled 20+ informal referrals through non-formal resolution, but is acknowledged to be in early 'honeymoon period' before legitimacy is tested
Why it matters
Food supply chain fairness directly determines whether British farmers remain viable and whether food security depends on a consolidated, lightly-regulated supermarket sector—with knock-on effects on food prices, rural communities, and UK agricultural independence.
Tone arc
Inquiry opened procedurally examining regulatory frameworks (April 2025), but shifted sharply adversarial by December 2025 when evidence revealed structural conflicts of interest and inadequate regulator resourcing. Final April 2026 sessions with regulators themselves became confrontational, with stark questioning of whether informal collaborative models serve suppliers or entrench supermarket dominance.
Themes
Key witnesses
Mark White, Groceries Code Adjudicator, Richard Thompson, Agricultural Supply Chain Adjudicator, Dame Angela Eagle MP, Minister (DEFRA), Daniel Zeichner, DEFRA Minister, Emily Miles, Food Standards Authority, Andrew Opie, British Retail Consortium, Kate Dearden MP, Minister for Employment Rights and Consumer Protection
Witness sessions
Oral evidence · 1 April 2025 · HC 589
Session 1 of 5Oral evidence · 16 December 2025 · HC 589
Session 2 of 5Oral evidence · 21 April 2026 · HC 589
Session 3 of 5Mark White, Groceries Code Adjudicator; Richard Thompson, Agricultural Supply Chain Adjudicator
Oral evidence · 21 April 2026 · HC 589
Session 4 of 5Oral evidence · 19 May 2026 · HC 66
Session 5 of 5
Written evidence & correspondence
Correspondence · 3 June 2026
Correspondence · 21 April 2026
Correspondence · 14 April 2026
Correspondence · 17 March 2026
Correspondence · 3 December 2025
Correspondence · 20 May 2025
Correspondence · 18 March 2025
Themes & actors
Topics across publication summaries
Top organisations & named entities
- Alistair Carmichael MP·3 references
- Groceries Code Adjudicator·3 references
- Agriculture and Horticulture Development Board (AHDB)·2 references
- Agricultural Supply Chain Adjudicator·2 references
- Department for Business and Trade·2 references
- Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs·2 references
- Liam Byrne MP·2 references
- Environment, Food and Rural Affairs Committee·2 references
- Emma Reynolds MP, Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs·1 reference
- Alistair Carmichael MP, Chair of Environment, Food and Rural Affairs Committee·1 reference
Source · parliament.uk inquiry record ↗