Regular evidence sessions · Opened 20 November 2024
The work of the Department for Business and Trade
From: Business and Trade Committee
What this inquiry is asking
Is the Department for Business and Trade delivering on Labour's core economic promise to achieve fastest G7 growth? The inquiry examines whether the government's industrial strategy, employment rights reforms, regulatory reduction, and trade policy are coherent and sufficient to reverse decade-long productivity stagnation and offset cost pressures from national insurance and business rates increases.
Status / emerging findings
- IMF forecasts show UK tracking third in G7 growth through 2029, not first as government promised; government says it will outperform forecasts but has offered no mechanism to do so.
- Government announced £240 million in regulatory reforms in first month, targeting £1 billion by end of Parliament, but productivity growth remains 'anaemic' with no specific plan to reverse low investment trends.
- Energy costs identified as critical investment barrier (UK highest in Europe, sometimes double competitors); government committed £420 million to British Industrial Competitiveness Scheme and supercharger programme but timescales unclear.
- Committee pressed Secretary of State on contradiction: government claims to support growth while increasing business costs through national insurance and business rates; government defended measures as 'fixing foundations' but acknowledged timing tension.
- Trade strategy delayed pending industrial strategy publication; government rejected full EU regulatory convergence but confirmed sector-by-sector alignment, leaving policy direction unsettled.
Why it matters
The Department for Business and Trade is responsible for delivering the government's central economic promise; if growth targets are missed, public investment and public services funding depend on tax rises or cuts, making departmental strategy directly material to household and community outcomes.
Tone arc
First session (26 November) set defensive tone with government conceding structural challenges and third-place growth forecasts; second session (11 November) showed incremental shift toward tactical announcements (£240m reform target, energy investment) but committee maintained critical pressure on cost-growth contradiction and lack of measurable mechanisms.
Themes
Key witnesses
Rt Hon Peter Kyle MP, Secretary of State for Business and Trade, Rt Hon Jonathan Reynolds MP, former Secretary of State for Business and Trade, Gareth Davies CB, Permanent Secretary, Department for Business and Trade
Witness sessions
Oral evidence · 26 November 2024 · HC 450
Session 1 of 3Oral evidence · 11 November 2025 · HC 450
Session 2 of 3Oral evidence · 7 July 2026 · HC 120
Session 3 of 3
Written evidence & correspondence
Correspondence · 22 July 2026
Correspondence · 6 January 2026
Letter from the Secretary of State relating to the work of the Department, 19 December 2025
Correspondence · 4 December 2025
Correspondence · 2 September 2025
Correspondence · 23 July 2025
Correspondence · 15 July 2025
Letter from DBT Chief Operating Officer relating to ARA June Update, 30 June 2025
Correspondence · 3 June 2025
Correspondence · 22 April 2025
Correspondence · 20 March 2025
Letter to the Secretary of State for Business and Trade relating to Spending Review, 7 February 2025
Correspondence · 18 March 2025
Correspondence · 4 February 2025
Correspondence · 10 December 2024
Letter from the Secretary of State relating to the evidence session on 26 November, 4 December 2024
Themes & actors
Topics across publication summaries
Top organisations & named entities
- Department for Business and Trade·8 references
- Tara Smith·5 references
- Liam Byrne·5 references
- National Audit Office·5 references
- Liam Byrne MP·4 references
- Business and Trade Committee·4 references
- Post Office Limited·4 references
- Jonathan Reynolds MP·3 references
- British Business Bank·3 references
- Comptroller & Auditor General·3 references
Source · parliament.uk inquiry record ↗