Inquiry · Opened 10 July 2025
Financial sustainability of children’s care homes
From: Public Accounts Committee
What this inquiry is asking
Why has England's children's residential care system become financially unsustainable, and what's driving the 96% cost increase since 2019-20? The inquiry examines whether the market is broken—with private providers running 84% of homes, local authorities competing for scarce placements, and 800 children annually stuck in unregistered illegal homes—and what must change to protect vulnerable children and control expenditure.
Status / emerging findings
- Average cost per child in residential care jumped from £239,800 (2019-20) to £318,400 (2023-24); wage inflation and utility costs explain 60-80% of rises, but private equity involvement is creating unsustainable profit expectations
- Nearly 1,000 children annually placed in unregistered homes (illegal, uninspected by Ofsted) due to absence of regulated provision in their areas; some remain there for six months or longer
- 49% of children placed more than 20 miles from original home, severing family ties and access to local CAMHS, schools, and police, increasing exploitation and criminalisation risk
- Outcomes for residential care children significantly worse than foster care: higher criminal justice involvement, higher NEET rates, more placement instability, more children going missing
- Department for Education lacks clear vision for reform; Regional Care Co-operatives proposed as solution but witnesses disagreed on effectiveness; government response issued April 2026 but specifics on recommendation acceptance unclear from available documents
Why it matters
800 vulnerable children are sleeping in illegal, unregistered homes right now, and local authorities are spending £318,000 per child per year on a system that produces worse outcomes than foster care—this is a public money and child safeguarding crisis that demands urgent restructuring.
Tone arc
Opened procedural; November 2025 evidence session turned sharply adversarial as committee confronted representatives (Children's Homes Association, local authority directors, Children's Commissioner) over system dysfunction, cost escalation, and children's safety. Subsequent correspondence (December 2025–April 2026) shows unresolved tensions between sector and Department.
Themes
Key witnesses
Susan Acland-Hood (Department for Education), Isabelle Trowler CBE (Office of the Children's Commissioner), Gila Sacks (likely Children's Homes Association representative), Association of Directors of Children's Services, Children's Homes Association
Reports & Government Responses
Government Response · 1 April 2026 · HC 1233
Responds to: 61st Report - Financial sustainability of children’s care homes
Report · 16 January 2026 · HC 1233
61st Report - Financial sustainability of children’s care homes
Witness sessions
Oral evidence · 17 November 2025 · HC 1233
Session 1 of 1
Written evidence & correspondence
Correspondence · 8 June 2026
Correspondence · 27 April 2026
Correspondence · 12 January 2026
Correspondence · 8 January 2026
Correspondence · 8 December 2025
Themes & actors
Topics across publication summaries
Top organisations & named entities
- Department for Education·4 references
- Susan Acland-Hood·3 references
- Public Accounts Committee·3 references
- Sir Geoffrey Clifton-Brown·2 references
- Association of Directors of Children's Services·2 references
- Ofsted·2 references
- Children's Homes Association·2 references
- Sir Geoffrey Clifton-Brown MP·2 references
- Comptroller and Auditor General·1 reference
- Treasury Officer of Accounts·1 reference
Source · parliament.uk inquiry record ↗