Inquiry · Opened 12 December 2025

An analysis of the asylum system

From: Public Accounts Committee

Open3 documents1 evidence session

What this inquiry is asking

Can the Home Office actually deliver a £1 billion cost saving in the asylum system by 2028-29 through structural reform, and has it learned from previous failed attempts to fix backlogs and financial management failures? The inquiry examines whether new cross-government coordination and a consolidated operational structure will succeed where earlier reforms collapsed.

Status / emerging findings

  • Asylum backlog stood at 80,000 in September 2025; cases over one year in system fell from 30,637 to 16,593 year-on-year, suggesting recent progress but sustained reduction uncertain
  • A new asylum group of ~10,000 staff now manages end-to-end system (intake through removals) — the first consolidated operational structure, directly addressing prior NAO criticism of siloed working
  • Cross-government asylum system board created with Treasury and No. 10 representation to manage priorities and trade-offs; independent appeals body promised by legislation but no delivery date confirmed
  • Home Office has submitted follow-up correspondence (February and March 2026) but committee has not yet published conclusions or further scrutiny sessions

Why it matters

The asylum system consumes billions in public spending and affects tens of thousands of vulnerable people; a £1 billion saving target and backlog reduction depend entirely on whether the Home Office has fixed systemic coordination failures that have persisted across multiple governments.

Tone arc

Started procedural and structural (examining new governance frameworks), shifted to critical scrutiny around delivery credibility — witnesses were pressed on whether structural change alone addresses financial management and enforcement failures that derailed previous reforms.

Themes

asylum-backlog-reductioncross-government-coordinationfinancial-management-failureoperational-consolidationcost-savings-delivery

Key witnesses

Simon Ridley CB (Home Office), Dr Rannia Leontaridi OBE (Asylum Group Lead), Dr Jo Farrar (Ministry of Justice), Emma Churchill (Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government), Josh Goodman (likely NAO or independent expert)

Reports & Government Responses

Witness sessions

Written evidence & correspondence

Themes & actors

Source · parliament.uk inquiry record ↗

An analysis of the asylum system | Beyond The Vote | Beyond The Vote