A divisionDivision No. 59 · Wednesday, 15 July 2026· Commons· Trade Unions

Draft Trade Unions (Permissible Means of Voting) and Employment Rights (Unfair Dismissal) (Amendment) Order 2026

330Ayes
109Noes
Carried · majority 221 · Government won
210 did not vote
Aye330No109DID NOT VOTE · 210

649 Members · Aye 330 · No 109 · DNV 210 · grey dots in centre are abstentions

Analysis
Commons

Parliament voted on 15 July 2026 to approve the Draft Trade Unions (Permissible Means of Voting) and Employment Rights (Unfair Dismissal) (Amendment) Order 2026. The motion passed by 330 votes to 109. The order was considered in committee and approved on a division. The order makes two changes. It allows statutory trade union ballots, which were previously required to be conducted solely by post, to be held electronically, in hybrid form, or in the workplace. It also corrects a minor drafting error in section 105 of the Employment Rights Act 1996 arising from changes made by the Employment Rights Act 2025. In practical terms, trade unions organising industrial action or other statutory votes will now have a wider range of methods available to them, which the Government argues will reduce cost and administrative burden and bring trade union democracy into line with practices already used by political parties and listed companies. Labour MPs, including those sitting under the Labour and Co-operative label, voted unanimously in favour. Conservative MPs voted unanimously against, joined by Reform UK and the Democratic Unionist Party. Plaid Cymru, the Greens, the Scottish National Party, and smaller groupings backed the order. The vote followed a similar pattern to related employment rights divisions held on 1 July 2026, and was taken alongside a companion vote approving a new code of practice on electronic and workplace balloting, which passed by the same margin.

Voting Aye meant
Support modernising trade union balloting by permitting electronic, hybrid, and workplace voting alongside postal ballots, making union democracy more accessible and less burdensome.
Voting No meant
Oppose or raise concerns about the move away from exclusively postal balloting, citing questions about whether safeguards for ballot integrity, secrecy, and protection from interference are sufficient under the new methods.
§ 01Who voted how.439 voting Members · 210 absent

Each row is one party. The stacked bar gives the within-party split of Aye / No / Absent; the columns on the right give the raw counts. The party-line column is inferred from how cohesively each party voted, not a published whip: a clear one-way majority of a party’s voters reads as a line, a close division reads as “Split”.

Party
Party line
Aye / No / Abs
Aye
No
Abs
Labour Party
Voted Aye
280
0
80
Conservative and Unionist Party
Voted No
0
94
22
Liberal Democrats
1
0
70
Labour and Co-operative Party
Voted Aye
33
0
10
Independent
2
2
9
Reform UK
Voted No
0
6
1
Scottish National Party
2
0
5
Sinn Féin
0
0
7
Democratic Unionist Party
Voted No
0
4
1
Green Party of England and Wales
Voted Aye
4
0
1
Plaid Cymru
Voted Aye
4
0
0
Social Democratic and Labour Party
1
0
1
Your Party
2
0
0
Alliance Party of Northern Ireland
0
0
1
Restore Britain
0
1
0
Speaker
0
0
1
Traditional Unionist Voice
0
0
1
Ulster Unionist Party
0
1
0

Source · Hansard · UK Parliament Votes API · party line inferred from voting cohesion, not a published whip; “Split” = a close within-party division

Votes by party (CSV) · Premium
§ 02From the debate.2 principal speakers
Kate DeardenSupportiveHalifax
The statutory instrument modernises outdated postal-only balloting into line with secure practices used by political parties and companies, delivering on manifesto commitments while maintaining fairness, secrecy and security standards through strict safeguards.Labour · Voted no_vote_recorded · Read full speech (3,040 words)
Gareth DaviesOpposedGrantham and Bourne
The draft order lacks pilot evidence for workplace voting, creates conflicts of interest by allowing unions to choose their own voting methods, raises unanswered questions about cyber-security enforcement and legal challenge routes, and forms part of the damaging Employment Rights Act 2025.Conservative · Voted no · Read full speech (895 words)
§ 03Related divisions.Same topic · recent
Sources
Division dataUK Parliament Votes API
DebateHansard · Commons
Stance analysisAI analysis · Claude 4.x
LicenceOpen Parliament Licence v3.0