A divisionDivision No. 52 · Wednesday, 8 July 2026· Commons· Workplace Safety

Draft Supply of Machinery (Safety) (Amendment etc.) and the EU Machinery Regulation (Enforcement etc. in Northern Ireland) Regulations 2026

317Ayes
103Noes
Carried · majority 214 · Government won
230 did not vote
Aye317No102DID NOT VOTE · 230

650 Members · Aye 317 · No 103 · DNV 230 · grey dots in centre are abstentions

Analysis
Commons

Parliament voted on 8 July 2026 to approve the Draft Supply of Machinery (Safety) (Amendment etc.) and the EU Machinery Regulation (Enforcement etc. in Northern Ireland) Regulations 2026, Division 52. The vote passed by 317 ayes to 103 noes. The statutory instrument, laid before the House on 1 June 2026, makes two principal changes: it provides for the enforcement in Northern Ireland of the EU machinery regulation, covering powers for regulators, offences, penalties, and mechanisms for cooperation with EU authorities; and it amends the Great Britain regime by extending recognition of CE marking beyond January 2027 to avoid a regulatory cliff edge. The vote matters because it determines how machinery safety rules, covering products ranging from cranes and excavators to lawn mowers and leaf blowers, are applied across the United Kingdom. For Great Britain, the extension of CE marking recognition maintains continuity for businesses and supply chains. For Northern Ireland, the instrument provides the domestic legal infrastructure to enforce EU machinery standards that flow into that jurisdiction under the Windsor framework. Northern Ireland businesses dealing in machinery from the EU will be subject to those EU standards, without the same recognition of CE marking that applies in Great Britain under a separate regime. The division fell sharply along party lines. All 272 voting Labour MPs and 32 Labour and Co-operative MPs voted in favour, alongside the Greens, Plaid Cymru, SDLP, and two members listed as Your Party. All 92 voting Conservatives, both voting Reform UK members, the five voting Democratic Unionist Party members, and the Ulster Unionist Party's one voting member opposed the measure. The DUP and Conservatives raised concerns about the Windsor framework's democratic deficit, arguing that Northern Ireland is subject to EU rules over which it had no meaningful input. No Liberal Democrat votes are recorded in the data.

Voting Aye meant
Support updating machinery safety regulations and enforcing EU machinery rules in Northern Ireland as required by the Windsor Framework, accepting regulatory divergence between Northern Ireland and Great Britain as a necessary consequence of post-Brexit arrangements.
Voting No meant
Oppose the regulations on the grounds that they entrench Northern Ireland's competitive disadvantage, impose EU rules without democratic consent from Northern Ireland, and widen the regulatory gap within the United Kingdom without adequate impact assessment.
§ 01Who voted how.420 voting Members · 230 absent

Each row is one party. The stacked bar gives the within-party split of Aye / No / Absent; the columns on the right give the raw counts. The whip column shows the published party position — “Free vote” means the whip was formally removed for this division.

Party
Whip
Aye / No / Abs
Aye
No
Abs
Labour Party
Whipped Aye
272
0
88
Conservative and Unionist Party
Whipped No
0
92
24
Liberal Democrats
0
0
71
Labour and Co-operative Party
Whipped Aye
32
0
11
Independent
0
1
12
Reform UK
0
2
6
Scottish National Party
0
0
7
Sinn Féin
0
0
7
Democratic Unionist Party
Whipped No
0
5
0
Green Party of England and Wales
Whipped Aye
5
0
0
Plaid Cymru
Whipped Aye
4
0
0
Social Democratic and Labour Party
2
0
0
Your Party
2
0
0
Alliance Party of Northern Ireland
0
0
1
Restore Britain
0
0
1
Speaker
0
0
1
Traditional Unionist Voice
0
1
0
Ulster Unionist Party
0
1
0

Source · Hansard · UK Parliament Votes API · whip status from announced positions; “free vote” indicates the whip was formally removed

§ 02From the debate.7 principal speakers
Kate DeardenSupportiveHalifax
The regulations modernise machinery safety, avoid regulatory cliff edges, support trade, and reflect stakeholder consensus; enforcement will be proportionate and the government provides business support through a £16.6m funding package.Labour · Voted aye · Read full speech (3,384 words)
Dame Harriett BaldwinOpposedWest Worcestershire
The absence of a full impact assessment is a serious omission; the measure deepens UK regulatory divergence, imposes unclear costs on Northern Ireland businesses, and lacks clarity on the government's long-term reliance on EU standards.Conservative · Voted no · Read full speech (606 words)
Kit MalthouseOpposedNorth West Hampshire
The regulations exemplify a democratic deficit under the Windsor framework—the UK had no influence over rules that will be handed down to Northern Ireland; dual labelling and mandatory third-party assessments will burden small businesses without proper impact assessment.Conservative · Voted no · Read full speech (1,031 words)
Carla LockhartOpposedUpper Bann
The regulations entrench Northern Ireland's competitive disadvantage, add red tape and compliance burdens, and demonstrate the Windsor framework is bad for Northern Ireland; businesses should not face bureaucracy over rules they have no say in making.DUP · Voted no · Read full speech (825 words)
Sammy WilsonOpposedEast Antrim
The regulations separate Northern Ireland from UK-wide rules to facilitate EU regulation without consultation or impact assessment; they sacrifice Northern Ireland to enable the government's EU reset and lack justification beyond avoiding diplomatic friction.DUP · Voted no · Read full speech (1,064 words)
Jim AllisterOpposedNorth Antrim
The regulations are an affront to parliamentary sovereignty—they require Parliament to enforce EU-made laws it did not write and cannot change; the government is now moving to align the whole UK to those foreign laws.TUV · Voted no · Read full speech (615 words)
Dr Scott ArthurQuestioningEdinburgh South West
Pressing the DUP to clarify specific concerns about the regulations rather than speak in generalities; asking what difference the legislation will actually make to businesses.Labour · Voted aye · Read full speech (86 words)
Sources
Division dataUK Parliament Votes API
DebateHansard · Commons
Stance analysisAI analysis · Claude 4.x
LicenceOpen Parliament Licence v3.0