A divisionDivision No. 50 · Tuesday, 7 July 2026· Commons· Prison Reform

Opposition Day: Early release of prisoners

115Ayes
0Noes
Carried · majority 115 · Government lost
530 did not vote
Aye117No2DID NOT VOTE · 530

645 Members · Aye 115 · No 0 · DNV 530 · grey dots in centre are abstentions

Analysis
Commons

On 7 July 2026, the House of Commons passed a motion critical of the government's early release scheme for prisoners. The vote was 115 Ayes to 0 Noes. The government chose not to contest the division, meaning no MPs voted to defend the policy on record. The motion was brought as an Opposition Day debate, a parliamentary procedure that gives opposition parties dedicated time to set the agenda and force a vote on a topic of their choosing. The result carries no direct legal force but places on record a Commons majority hostile to the early release scheme. The policy, which releases prisoners before the end of their sentences to manage prison capacity, affects both the prison population and public confidence in the criminal justice system. The Conservatives provided the bulk of the Ayes, with 90 MPs voting in favour; 2 Conservative MPs voted No, and 24 had no vote recorded. Eleven Labour MPs voted with the opposition, a notable departure from their own government's policy, though 349 Labour MPs had no vote recorded. Plaid Cymru, the DUP, the Greens, Traditional Unionist Voice, and several independents also voted Aye. The Liberal Democrats and Reform UK had no votes recorded on either side. The result reflects the government's standard practice of not whipping MPs to vote in Opposition Day debates, allowing the motion to pass without registering formal resistance.

Voting Aye meant
Support the opposition's motion criticising or opposing the early release of prisoners
Voting No meant
Oppose the motion and defend the government's early release policy
§ 01Who voted how.115 voting Members · 530 absent

Each row is one party. The stacked bar gives the within-party split of Aye / No / Absent; the columns on the right give the raw counts. The whip column shows the published party position — “Free vote” means the whip was formally removed for this division.

Party
Whip
Aye / No / Abs
Aye
No
Abs
Labour Party
Whipped Aye
11
0
349
Conservative and Unionist Party
Whipped Aye
90
2
24
Liberal Democrats
0
0
71
Labour and Co-operative Party
0
0
43
Independent
4
0
9
Reform UK
0
0
8
Scottish National Party
0
0
7
Sinn Féin
0
0
7
Democratic Unionist Party
Whipped Aye
4
0
1
Green Party of England and Wales
Whipped Aye
3
0
2
Plaid Cymru
Whipped Aye
4
0
0
Social Democratic and Labour Party
0
0
2
Your Party
0
0
2
Alliance Party of Northern Ireland
0
0
1
Restore Britain
0
0
1
Speaker
0
0
1
Traditional Unionist Voice
1
0
0
Ulster Unionist Party
0
0
1

Source · Hansard · UK Parliament Votes API · whip status from announced positions; “free vote” indicates the whip was formally removed

§ 02From the debate.7 principal speakers
Nick TimothyOpposedWest Suffolk
Sexual offenders and rape gang members must be excluded from early release; the Government has caved to Opposition pressure but refuses to specify how it will prevent their release starting in September.Conservative · Voted aye · Read full speech (3,580 words)
Jake RichardsSupportiveRother Valley
Early release of some offenders is necessary to prevent prison system collapse; exclusions of serious offenders risk creating the very crisis that forced emergency measures; robust licence conditions and probation investment manage risk.Labour · Voted no_vote_recorded · Read full speech (2,960 words)
Sir John HayesOpposedSouth Holland and The Deepings
Public expects the state to exact retribution on serious offenders; diminishing sentences erodes faith in the criminal justice system; offers common ground with Government to find a solution.Conservative · Voted aye · Read full speech (420 words)
Sir Julian LewisOpposedNew Forest East
Serious sexual and violent offenders are a minority of the prison population; other categories could be released instead; recall mechanisms are ineffective if breach means a new victim.Conservative · Voted aye · Read full speech (231 words)
Jess Brown-FullerQuestioningChichester
Victims receive impersonal, blanket letters lacking specificity about their perpetrator; victims have been failed at every step and deserve clearer, personalised communication about release decisions.Labour · Voted no_vote_recorded · Read full speech (375 words)
Esther McVeyOpposedTatton
Ministers previously promised those convicted of heinous crimes would not be released; letters informing victims their perpetrators may walk free contradict that promise and betray victims.Conservative · Voted aye · Read full speech (140 words)
Paula BarkerQuestioningLiverpool Wavertree
Questions whether releasing dangerous sexual predators aligns with the manifesto commitment to halve violence against women and girls.Labour · Voted aye · Read full speech (61 words)
§ 03Related divisions.Same topic · recent
Sources
Division dataUK Parliament Votes API
DebateHansard · Commons
Stance analysisAI analysis · Claude 4.x
LicenceOpen Parliament Licence v3.0