Division · No. 476Tuesday, 14 April 2026Commons Crime and Policing

Crime and Policing Bill: motion to agree with all remaining Lords Amendments

247
Ayes
21
Noes
Passed · Government won
380 did not vote
Analysis
Commons

**What happened:** On 14 April 2026, MPs voted by 247 to 21 to accept a package of remaining Lords amendments to the Crime and Policing Bill. The motion passed comfortably, effectively approving a bundle of changes made by the House of Lords, including some the government had accepted outright and others it had negotiated alternatives for, covering areas from policing powers to civil liberties protections around freedom of thought, religion, and expression. **Why it matters:** The Crime and Policing Bill is a wide-ranging piece of legislation affecting how police operate, what powers they hold, and how criminal justice is administered across England and Wales. Passing this package of Lords amendments brings the Bill closer to receiving Royal Assent (becoming law). Some of the amendments touch directly on civil liberties, including protections for freedom of expression and religious belief, meaning the final shape of those provisions is now largely settled. The Democratic Unionist Party, Ulster Unionist Party, and Traditional Unionist Voice all voted in favour, reflecting cross-community support in Northern Ireland for the government's approach. **The politics:** The vote was overwhelmingly government-led, with 239 Labour and Labour and Co-operative MPs voting in favour. The 21 votes against came almost entirely from within Labour's own ranks (15 Labour MPs), joined by three independents, three Plaid Cymru MPs, one Green, and one MP from Your Party. The Conservative Party, despite holding 116 seats, registered no votes on either side, abstaining entirely. The dissenters appear motivated by concern that civil liberties amendments, particularly those relating to freedom of thought, religion, and expression, were being waved through in a package vote without adequate individual scrutiny. This division sits within a broader ping-pong process (the back-and-forth between the Commons and Lords to reach agreement) that continued into later votes on 20 April 2026.

Voting Aye meant
Support accepting the package of Lords amendments (including government-negotiated compromises) to finalise the Crime and Policing Bill
Voting No meant
Oppose the package, potentially concerned that certain Lords amendments engaging civil liberties — such as those relating to freedom of thought, religion, and expression — were not being given proper parliamentary scrutiny before being accepted or rejected
§ 01Who voted how.268 voting members · 380 absent
Aye247No23DID NOT VOTE · 380

268 voting MPs. Each dot is one vote; left-to-right by party. Grey dots in the centre are the 380 who did not vote.

Aye
No
Absent
Labour PartyWhipped Aye
218
15
129
Conservative and Unionist Party
0
0
116
Liberal Democrats
0
0
72
Labour and Co-operative PartyWhipped Aye
21
0
21
Independent
1
3
9
Scottish National Party
0
0
9
Reform UK
0
0
8
Sinn Féin
0
0
7
Democratic Unionist PartyWhipped Aye
5
0
Green Party of England and Wales
0
1
4
Plaid CymruWhipped No
0
3
1
Social Democratic and Labour Party
0
0
2
Alliance Party of Northern Ireland
0
0
1
Speaker
0
0
1
Traditional Unionist Voice
1
0
Ulster Unionist Party
1
0
Your Party
0
1
§ 02From the debate.1 principal speaker
Sarah JonesSupportiveCroydon West
Moved motions to disagree with specific Lords amendments on crime and policing measures while agreeing with the majority of Lords amendments on respect orders and related provisions.Labour · Voted aye · Read full speech
§ 03Related divisions.Same topic · recent
Sources
Division dataUK Parliament Votes API
DebateHansard · Commons
Stance analysisAI analysis · Claude 4.x
LicenceOpen Parliament Licence v3.0