Crime and Policing Bill: motion to disagree with Lords Amendment 6
299
Ayes
—
169
Noes
Passed · Government won
182 did not vote
Analysis
Commons
Commons
**What happened:** On 14 April 2026, MPs voted by 299 to 169 to reject Lords Amendment 6 to the Crime and Policing Bill. The amendment, passed by the House of Lords, would have introduced stronger powers to tackle fly-tipping. The government opposed the Lords change, and its position carried comfortably. **Why it matters:** Fly-tipping is a persistent problem across England and Wales, with rural landowners and local authorities frequently bearing the cost of clearing illegal waste dumps on their land. Lords Amendment 6 would have given enforcement agencies and affected communities stronger legal tools to pursue those responsible. By voting to reject it, MPs backed the government's existing or alternative approach to the issue, leaving the enhanced enforcement mechanisms the Lords had proposed off the statute book, at least in this form. **The politics:** The vote divided almost entirely along government-versus-opposition lines. All 266 voting Labour MPs and 27 Labour and Co-operative MPs backed the government's position, while Conservatives (89), Liberal Democrats (61), the Democratic Unionist Party (5), Plaid Cymru (3), Reform UK (3), and the Traditional Unionist Voice (1) all voted against. Seven independents also voted no. The three Green MPs who voted backed the government, an unusual alignment given the environmental character of the amendment. The vote sits within a broader pattern of Lords-Commons ping-pong (the process by which the two Houses exchange amendments until agreement is reached) on the Crime and Policing Bill, with several further related divisions following on 20 April 2026.
Voting Aye meant
Support the government rejecting the Lords' fly-tipping amendment, trusting the government's alternative approach (or lack thereof) to tackling illegal waste dumping
Voting No meant
Support the Lords' amendment to introduce tougher measures against fly-tipping, arguing rural communities and landowners need stronger legal protections and enforcement powers
468 voting MPs. Each dot is one vote; left-to-right by party. Grey dots in the centre are the 182 who did not vote.
Aye
No
Absent
Labour PartyWhipped Aye
266
0
96
Conservative and Unionist PartyWhipped No
0
89
27
Liberal DemocratsWhipped No
0
61
11
Labour and Co-operative PartyWhipped Aye
27
0
15
Independent
1
7
5
Scottish National Party
0
0
9
Reform UKWhipped No
0
3
5
Sinn Féin
0
0
7
Democratic Unionist PartyWhipped No
0
5
—
Green Party of England and WalesWhipped Aye
3
0
2
Plaid CymruWhipped No
0
3
1
Social Democratic and Labour Party
0
0
2
Alliance Party of Northern Ireland
0
0
1
Speaker
0
0
1
Traditional Unionist Voice
0
1
—
Ulster Unionist Party
0
1
—
Your Party
0
1
—
Moved motions to disagree with specific Lords amendments on crime and policing measures while agreeing with the majority of Lords amendments on respect orders and related provisions.Labour · Voted aye · Read full speech →
Sources
Division dataUK Parliament Votes API
DebateHansard · Commons
Stance analysisAI analysis · Claude 4.x
LicenceOpen Parliament Licence v3.0