§ 00 Issue15 named divisions1 bill
Crime and Policing
Law enforcement, criminal justice, and community safety
Government alignment shows how often each party voted with the government's stated position. Issue-aligned direction shows agreement with the AI-identified supportive stance.
Voted with government positionVoted in issue-aligned direction
22 Apr 2026Crime and Policing Bill: Government motion in relation to LA439Aye = Support the government's position on amendment LA439 to the Crime and Policing Bill · No = Oppose the government's position on amendment LA439, backing the alternative approach proposed in or against LA439253 · 145Passed20 Apr 2026Crime and Policing Bill: Motion relating Lords Reasons 359B and 439BAye = Support the government's position on Lords amendments 359B and 439B to the Crime and Policing Bill, likely rejecting or modifying the Lords' proposed changes · No = Oppose the government's handling of these Lords amendments, likely preferring to accept the Lords' original changes to the bill294 · 160Passed20 Apr 2026Crime and Policing Bill: Motion relating to Lords Reason 342BAye = Support the Commons position in rejecting or disagreeing with the Lords' reasoning on amendment 342B to the Crime and Policing Bill · No = Support the Lords' position or reasoning on amendment 342B, opposing the Commons majority view295 · 63Passed20 Apr 2026Crime and Policing Bill: Motion relating to Lords Reason 11BAye = Support the Commons (government) position in response to Lords Reason 11B, rejecting or qualifying the Lords' proposed change to the Crime and Policing Bill · No = Back the Lords' position on this amendment, opposing the government's preferred approach to the relevant provision in the Crime and Policing Bill295 · 157Passed20 Apr 2026Crime and Policing Bill: Motion relating to Lords Amendments 2D and 2EAye = Support the government's position on Lords Amendments 2D and 2E to the Crime and Policing Bill, likely rejecting or modifying the Lords' changes · No = Oppose the government's position, preferring to retain the Lords' amendments as passed in the upper chamber295 · 160Passed14 Apr 2026Crime and Policing Bill: motion to disagree with Lords Amendment 2Aye = Support the government's position of rejecting the specific Lords amendment while accepting the government's own alternative provisions in its place · No = Support retaining the Lords amendment as passed, disagreeing with the government's proposed substitution299 · 178Passed14 Apr 2026Crime and Policing Bill: motion to disagree with Lords Amendment 357Aye = Support the government in rejecting the Lords amendment, preserving the 'historical safeguard' that protects legitimate political discourse about terrorism from prosecution under encouragement-of-terrorism laws · No = Support the Lords amendment, arguing that glorifying acts of terrorism by proscribed organisations should not benefit from the historical safeguard, and that the current law is too permissive279 · 75Passed14 Apr 2026Crime and Policing Bill: motion to disagree with Lords Amendment 342Aye = Support the government's approach of using flexible statutory guidance rather than rigid statutory evidence requirements for youth diversion orders in terrorism cases · No = Support the Lords' position that specific evidence requirements should be enshrined in statute to ensure courts only impose youth diversion orders where truly necessary and proportionate283 · 71Passed14 Apr 2026Crime and Policing Bill: motion to disagree with Lords Amendment 311Aye = Support the government's rejection of the Lords' amendment 311, backing the government's preferred alternative approach to the underlying issue in the Crime and Policing Bill · No = Support retaining the Lords' amendment 311, opposing the government overriding the Lords' change to the Bill301 · 103Passed14 Apr 2026Crime and Policing Bill: motion to disagree with Lords Amendment 334Aye = Support the government's approach of replacing the existing NCHI code of practice with a stricter national standard, rather than an outright statutory abolition of NCHIs · No = Back the Lords amendment to fully abolish non-crime hate incidents in law, arguing the government's alternative does not go far enough to protect free speech and civil liberties357 · 92Passed
How is this calculated?
Government alignment shows how often a party's MPs voted with the government's stated position on this issue. This is the most comparable metric across parties, as it measures the same reference point for everyone.
Issue-aligned direction shows how often MPs voted in the direction tagged as supportive of this issue by AI analysis. For example, if a vote is tagged “pro-environment”, an Aye vote counts as aligned.