Division · No. 414Wednesday, 21 January 2026Commons Taxation

National Insurance Contributions (Employer Pensions Contributions) Bill Committee: Amendment 5

191
Ayes
326
Noes
Defeated · Government won
132 did not vote
Analysis
Commons

Parliament voted on Amendment 5 to the National Insurance Contributions (Employer Pensions Contributions) Bill during its Committee stage on 21 January 2026. The amendment, moved by Conservative shadow minister Mark Garnier, proposed that the bill's £2,000 annual cap on tax-free salary sacrifice pension contributions should only apply to higher and additional rate taxpayers, thereby exempting basic rate taxpayers in England, Wales and Scotland from the cap entirely. The amendment was defeated by 326 votes to 191. The bill as written creates a power to apply employer and employee national insurance contributions on salary sacrifice pension contributions above £2,000 per year, taking effect from April 2029. Salary sacrifice is an arrangement where employees give up part of their salary in exchange for employer pension contributions, reducing the national insurance they pay. The government argues the cost to the Treasury of these schemes was set to nearly treble by 2030, rising from £2.8 billion in 2017 to around £8 billion. Had Amendment 5 passed, basic rate taxpayers would have retained full access to salary sacrifice arrangements regardless of contribution size, narrowing the fiscal impact of the reform considerably. The vote divided along near-perfect party lines. All Labour and Labour and Co-operative MPs voted against the amendment, providing the government's majority. Every Conservative, Liberal Democrat, Scottish National Party, Democratic Unionist Party, Plaid Cymru and Reform UK MP who voted supported it, alongside most independents. There were no notable rebels on either side. The defeat of this amendment was consistent with subsequent votes in March 2026, when the government also moved to reject several Lords amendments to the same bill, suggesting the legislation continued to face significant opposition in the upper chamber even after passing the Commons.

Voting Aye meant
Support protecting basic rate taxpayers from the £2,000 pension contributions cap, arguing the cap unfairly burdens ordinary workers and discourages long-term pension saving
Voting No meant
Oppose the exemption, defending the government's Bill as introduced and applying the £2,000 cap to all taxpayers regardless of income tax rate
§ 01Who voted how.517 voting members · 132 absent
Aye192No325DID NOT VOTE · 132

517 voting MPs. Each dot is one vote; left-to-right by party. Grey dots in the centre are the 132 who did not vote.

Aye
No
Absent
Labour PartyWhipped No
0
291
71
Conservative and Unionist PartyWhipped Aye
97
0
19
Liberal DemocratsWhipped Aye
67
0
5
Labour and Co-operative PartyWhipped No
0
31
11
Independent
5
2
6
Scottish National PartyWhipped Aye
8
0
1
Reform UKWhipped Aye
4
0
4
Sinn Féin
0
0
7
Democratic Unionist PartyWhipped Aye
5
0
Green Party of England and Wales
0
0
4
Plaid CymruWhipped Aye
4
0
Social Democratic and Labour Party
0
0
2
Alliance Party of Northern Ireland
0
0
1
Speaker
0
0
1
Traditional Unionist Voice
1
0
Ulster Unionist Party
1
0
Your Party
0
1
§ 02From the debate.6 principal speakers
Mark GarnierOpposedWyre Forest
Opposes the Bill as regressive, harming lower earners and graduates disproportionately; argues the £2,000 cap should exempt basic rate taxpayers and be indexed to inflation.Conservative · Voted aye · Read full speech (3,086 words)
Torsten BellSupportiveSwansea West
Supports the Bill as pragmatic and necessary reform to control salary sacrifice costs rising from £2.8bn to £8bn by 2030; defends the £2,000 cap as affecting only 5% of lower earners.Labour · Voted no · Read full speech (2,373 words)
Charlie MaynardOpposedWitney
Opposes the Bill, citing lack of impact assessments, burden on small businesses, and disincentive to pension saving; supports amendment requiring publication of lifetime pension value impacts.Liberal Democrat · Voted aye · Read full speech (1,053 words)
Chris VinceSupportiveHarlow
Supports the Bill; emphasizes need to address cost-of-living crisis and that many constituents cannot afford pensions; agrees the salary sacrifice cost is unsustainable.Labour · Voted no · Read full speech (259 words)
Jim ShannonOpposedStrangford
Agrees with Conservative criticism that the Bill attacks younger people and families; views it as harmful to those with aspirations for the future.Democratic Unionist Party · Voted aye · Read full speech (106 words)
Sir Ashley FoxOpposedBridgwater
Challenges the Minister on the inequity of the cap, questioning how withdrawing 17% relief from basic rate taxpayers with student loans is pragmatic.Conservative · Voted aye · Read full speech (52 words)
§ 03Related divisions.Same topic · recent
Sources
Division dataUK Parliament Votes API
DebateHansard · Commons
Stance analysisAI analysis · Claude 4.x
LicenceOpen Parliament Licence v3.0