Division · No. 390Wednesday, 10 December 2025Commons Employment

Government Amendment to Opposition day debate on seasonal work

320
Ayes
98
Noes
Passed · Government won
232 did not vote
Analysis
Commons

**What happened**: On 10 December 2025, the House of Commons voted on a government amendment to an opposition day motion (a parliamentary debate called by the opposition to press a policy agenda) concerning seasonal agricultural workers. The government's amendment passed by 320 votes to 98. The same day, the original opposition motion was defeated separately, with 98 in favour and 325 against, confirming that the government successfully substituted its own preferred text for the opposition's. **Why it matters**: The vote determined the terms on which Parliament expressed its view about the seasonal worker scheme, which allows agricultural employers to recruit workers from overseas on short-term visas to pick fruit, vegetables and other produce. The government's amendment reflected a more employer-friendly approach, prioritising business flexibility and limiting additional regulatory burdens on the agricultural sector, rather than the stronger worker protections the opposition was seeking. This affects the tens of thousands of seasonal workers employed each year on UK farms, as well as the farming businesses that depend on them, and has implications for food supply chains and rural economies. **The politics**: The vote divided almost entirely along party lines. Labour and Labour and Co-operative MPs provided all 320 ayes, while 91 of the 98 no votes came from Conservative MPs, with small numbers of Reform UK, Democratic Unionist Party and independent members joining them. The Liberal Democrats, who hold 72 seats, were entirely absent from this division. This vote sits within a broader period of friction between the government and opposition over employment and agricultural policy, including ongoing parliamentary activity around the Employment Rights Bill, which was moving between the Commons and Lords at the same time.

Voting Aye meant
Support the government's amended version of the motion on seasonal work, accepting the government's framing of its approach to seasonal agricultural labour
Voting No meant
Prefer the original opposition motion on seasonal work, signalling dissatisfaction with the government's record or policy on seasonal worker schemes and rural employment
§ 01Who voted how.418 voting members · 232 absent
Aye319No98DID NOT VOTE · 232

418 voting MPs. Each dot is one vote; left-to-right by party. Grey dots in the centre are the 232 who did not vote.

Aye
No
Absent
Labour PartyWhipped Aye
281
0
81
Conservative and Unionist PartyWhipped No
0
91
25
Liberal Democrats
0
0
72
Labour and Co-operative PartyWhipped Aye
33
0
9
Independent
5
4
4
Scottish National Party
0
0
9
Reform UK
0
2
6
Sinn Féin
0
0
7
Democratic Unionist Party
0
1
4
Green Party of England and Wales
0
0
4
Plaid Cymru
0
0
4
Social Democratic and Labour Party
0
0
2
Alliance Party of Northern Ireland
0
0
1
Speaker
0
0
1
Traditional Unionist Voice
0
0
1
Ulster Unionist Party
0
0
1
Your Party
0
0
1
§ 02From the debate.6 principal speakers
Nigel HuddlestonOpposedDroitwich and Evesham
Government policies on NI, business rates and the Employment Rights Bill are destroying seasonal and flexible work, particularly harming young people and hospitality sector; Conservatives offer pro-business alternative including abolishing business rates.Conservative · Voted no · Read full speech (4,660 words)
Blair McDougallSupportiveEast Renfrewshire
Government recognises challenges facing businesses; Budget provides £4 billion business rates relief with permanent cuts for hospitality; Employment Rights Bill improves worker security without destroying seasonal work; Government is putting money into people's pockets to drive footfall.Labour · Voted aye · Read full speech (2,566 words)
Sarah OlneyNeutralRichmond Park
Welcome Employment Rights Bill principles but pushed for improvements; support 5% VAT cut for hospitality; business rates system needs complete overhaul; concerned about NI impacts on small businesses; call for youth mobility scheme and skills reform.Liberal Democrat · Voted no_vote_recorded · Read full speech (2,915 words)
Euan StainbankSupportiveFalkirk
Employment Rights Bill essential to make work pay; drew on personal hospitality experience to defend worker protections; Government minimum wage increases benefit young workers; opposed Conservative calls to freeze wages.Labour · Voted aye · Read full speech (2,358 words)
Tom TugendhatOpposedTonbridge
Fundamental difference in philosophy: Conservatives recognise private sector creates jobs and wealth; Labour incorrectly believe Government creates jobs; problem is lack of business experience in Cabinet, particularly HR experience of small businesses with fewer than 10 employees.Conservative · Voted no · Read full speech (492 words)
Dr Luke EvansOpposedHinckley and Bosworth
Tourism tax is hypocritical given Government's earlier claim sector was 'taxed enough'; young people leaving UK due to job prospects; wealth creators and top earners also leaving due to tax policies.Conservative · Voted no · Read full speech (2,381 words)
§ 03Related divisions.Same topic · recent
Sources
Division dataUK Parliament Votes API
DebateHansard · Commons
Stance analysisAI analysis · Claude 4.x
LicenceOpen Parliament Licence v3.0