Division · No. 389Wednesday, 10 December 2025Commons Employment

Opposition day: Seasonal work

98
Ayes
325
Noes
Defeated · Government won
226 did not vote
Analysis
Commons

**What happened:** On 10 December 2025, the House of Commons voted on a Conservative opposition day motion on seasonal work. The motion was defeated by 325 votes to 98. Opposition day debates give parties that are not in government the opportunity to bring forward their own proposals for a parliamentary vote, and on this occasion the Conservatives put forward a motion calling for changes to seasonal work arrangements and temporary labour policies. **Why it matters:** The vote concerned how seasonal and agricultural workers are recruited, managed, and protected in the United Kingdom. Seasonal worker schemes are a significant mechanism for filling short-term labour gaps in sectors such as horticulture and food production, and the question of how they are structured touches on immigration policy, employment rights, and rural economic sustainability. The defeat of the motion means the government's existing approach to these issues remains in place, with no parliamentary instruction to change course on seasonal work policy. **The politics:** The vote divided almost entirely along party lines. All 91 Conservative MPs who voted backed the motion, while all 280 Labour MPs and all 33 Labour and Co-operative MPs who voted opposed it. Two Reform UK MPs and one Democratic Unionist Party MP voted with the Conservatives, while the Greens and the SDLP voted with the government. Six independents voted for the motion and five against. The same day the government passed an amendment to the opposition's seasonal work motion by 320 votes to 98, effectively substituting its own position for the Conservatives' text. This vote sits in a broader context of Conservative opposition activity on employment and rural themes, with related opposition day debates on youth unemployment and rural communities taking place in the weeks that followed.

Voting Aye meant
Support the opposition's position on seasonal work, likely backing improved conditions, visa access, or protections for seasonal agricultural workers
Voting No meant
Reject the opposition motion on seasonal work, backing the government's existing approach to seasonal labour in agriculture
§ 01Who voted how.423 voting members · 226 absent
Aye100No323DID NOT VOTE · 226

423 voting MPs. Each dot is one vote; left-to-right by party. Grey dots in the centre are the 226 who did not vote.

Aye
No
Absent
Labour PartyWhipped No
0
280
82
Conservative and Unionist PartyWhipped Aye
91
0
25
Liberal Democrats
0
0
72
Labour and Co-operative PartyWhipped No
0
33
9
Independent
6
5
2
Scottish National Party
0
0
9
Reform UK
2
0
6
Sinn Féin
0
0
7
Democratic Unionist Party
1
0
4
Green Party of England and WalesWhipped No
0
4
Plaid Cymru
0
0
4
Social Democratic and Labour Party
0
1
1
Alliance Party of Northern Ireland
0
0
1
Speaker
0
0
1
Traditional Unionist Voice
0
0
1
Ulster Unionist Party
0
0
1
Your Party
0
0
1
§ 02From the debate.6 principal speakers
Nigel HuddlestonOpposedDroitwich and Evesham
Government policies on NI, business rates and the Employment Rights Bill are destroying seasonal and flexible work, particularly harming young people and hospitality sector; Conservatives offer pro-business alternative including abolishing business rates.Conservative · Voted aye · Read full speech (4,660 words)
Blair McDougallSupportiveEast Renfrewshire
Government recognises challenges facing businesses; Budget provides £4 billion business rates relief with permanent cuts for hospitality; Employment Rights Bill improves worker security without destroying seasonal work; Government is putting money into people's pockets to drive footfall.Labour · Voted no · Read full speech (2,566 words)
Sarah OlneyNeutralRichmond Park
Welcome Employment Rights Bill principles but pushed for improvements; support 5% VAT cut for hospitality; business rates system needs complete overhaul; concerned about NI impacts on small businesses; call for youth mobility scheme and skills reform.Liberal Democrat · Voted no_vote_recorded · Read full speech (2,915 words)
Euan StainbankSupportiveFalkirk
Employment Rights Bill essential to make work pay; drew on personal hospitality experience to defend worker protections; Government minimum wage increases benefit young workers; opposed Conservative calls to freeze wages.Labour · Voted no · Read full speech (2,358 words)
Tom TugendhatOpposedTonbridge
Fundamental difference in philosophy: Conservatives recognise private sector creates jobs and wealth; Labour incorrectly believe Government creates jobs; problem is lack of business experience in Cabinet, particularly HR experience of small businesses with fewer than 10 employees.Conservative · Voted aye · Read full speech (492 words)
Dr Luke EvansOpposedHinckley and Bosworth
Tourism tax is hypocritical given Government's earlier claim sector was 'taxed enough'; young people leaving UK due to job prospects; wealth creators and top earners also leaving due to tax policies.Conservative · Voted aye · Read full speech (2,381 words)
§ 03Related divisions.Same topic · recent
Sources
Division dataUK Parliament Votes API
DebateHansard · Commons
Stance analysisAI analysis · Claude 4.x
LicenceOpen Parliament Licence v3.0