Budget Resolution No. 50: Inheritance tax (limiting agricultural and business property reliefs etc)
327Ayes
182Noes
Carried · majority 145 · Government won139 did not vote
648 Members · Aye 327 · No 182 · DNV 139 · grey dots in centre are abstentions
Analysis
Commons
Commons
Parliament voted on 2 December 2025 to pass Budget Resolution No. 50, which limits Agricultural Property Relief (APR) and Business Property Relief (BPR) from inheritance tax. The resolution passed by 327 votes to 182. These reliefs have historically allowed farms and family businesses to be transferred between generations free of inheritance tax; the resolution caps them, meaning larger estates will face tax liability on transfer that was previously avoided. The practical effect is to restrict an inheritance tax exemption that critics of the change say has allowed the wealthiest landowners and business owners to pass on significant assets untaxed. Going forward, qualifying agricultural and business property above the new cap will be subject to inheritance tax on transfer. Supporters argue this closes a loophole that benefits large estates disproportionately; opponents argue it threatens genuinely family-run farms and smaller businesses, potentially forcing heirs to sell productive assets to meet a tax bill. Labour and Labour and Co-operative MPs voted almost unanimously in favour, providing the government's majority. The Conservatives, Liberal Democrats, Scottish National Party, Reform UK, Democratic Unionist Party, and Plaid Cymru all voted against, forming a broad but ultimately unsuccessful cross-party opposition. Two of the four Green MPs voted no, with one voting aye. One Labour MP voted against the government. The vote sits within a cluster of contested Budget and Finance Bill divisions in late 2025 and early 2026, including committee votes on related Finance (No. 2) Bill clauses in January 2026.
Voting Aye meant
Support limiting inheritance tax reliefs on agricultural and business property, accepting that large estates should face greater tax liability on transfer
Voting No meant
Oppose limiting these reliefs, arguing the changes threaten family farms and small businesses by imposing inheritance tax burdens that could force asset sales
Each row is one party. The stacked bar gives the within-party split of Aye / No / Absent; the columns on the right give the raw counts. The party-line column is inferred from how cohesively each party voted, not a published whip: a clear one-way majority of a party’s voters reads as a line, a close division reads as “Split”.
Party
Party line
Aye / No / Abs
Aye
No
Abs
Labour Party
Voted Aye
282
1
78
Conservative and Unionist Party
Voted No
0
89
27
Liberal Democrats
Voted No
0
59
12
Labour and Co-operative Party
Voted Aye
38
0
4
Independent
—
6
4
3
Scottish National Party
Voted No
0
8
1
Reform UK
Voted No
0
8
0
Sinn Féin
—
0
0
7
Democratic Unionist Party
Voted No
0
5
0
Green Party of England and Wales
Split
1
2
1
Plaid Cymru
Voted No
0
4
0
Social Democratic and Labour Party
—
0
0
2
Your Party
—
1
0
1
Alliance Party of Northern Ireland
—
0
0
1
Restore Britain
—
0
0
1
Speaker
—
0
0
1
Traditional Unionist Voice
—
0
1
0
Ulster Unionist Party
—
0
1
0
Source · Hansard · UK Parliament Votes API · party line inferred from voting cohesion, not a published whip; “Split” = a close within-party division
Budget is morally necessary investment to lift children from poverty, rebuild NHS as public service, and tackle public health crisis; lifting two-child cap is paid for by tax avoidance crackdowns and gambling tax.Labour · Voted aye · Read full speech (4,668 words) →
Budget is a tax grab on working people without real reform plan; NHS waiting lists falling far too slowly; government failed to resolve strikes and has no credible social care strategy.Conservative · Voted no · Read full speech (2,779 words) →
Budget treads water on NHS; unclear how medicine price increases and reorganisation costs will be paid; calls for EU customs union and better GP access rather than tax rises.Liberal Democrat · Voted no · Read full speech (2,898 words) →
Budget is progressive and fair; lifting two-child cap will reduce child poverty by 500,000; tax reforms on wealthy and investment in employment support are sound policy.Labour · Voted aye · Read full speech (917 words) →
NHS frontline staff at St Thomas' hospital deserve recognition for managing through strikes; government must prevent further strike action.Labour · Voted aye · Read full speech (89 words) →
Budget lacks growth measures and imposes stealth taxes on working people; freeze on income tax thresholds and EV tax burden rural constituencies disproportionately.Independent · Voted no · Read full speech (714 words) →
Strongly defends two-child cap removal as moral imperative; criticizes Opposition for opposing child poverty relief despite UK being wealthy nation.Labour · Voted aye · Read full speech (543 words) →
Sources
Division dataUK Parliament Votes API
DebateHansard · Commons
Stance analysisAI analysis · Claude 4.x
LicenceOpen Parliament Licence v3.0