English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill: Third Reading
322
Ayes
—
179
Noes
Passed · Government won
146 did not vote
Analysis
Commons
Commons
**What happened** On 25 November 2025, the House of Commons passed the English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill at Third Reading by 322 votes to 179. Third Reading is the final stage in the Commons, representing Parliament's last opportunity to approve or reject the complete text of the Bill before it passes to the House of Lords. The result confirmed the government's majority was sufficient to carry the legislation through despite sustained opposition from Conservative, Liberal Democrat, Reform UK and Green MPs. **Why it matters** The Bill establishes a new framework for transferring powers from central government to English regions and local areas. Its provisions cover the creation and expansion of combined authorities with elected mayors, new community rights to buy local assets, reforms to local audit arrangements, national minimum standards for taxi and private hire vehicle licensing, and changes to commercial lease terms. In practical terms, it affects how decisions are made across England about planning, transport, local services and economic development, shifting some of that decision-making away from Westminster and Whitehall toward regional mayors and local councils. It also introduces a community right to bid for assets of community value, touches the governance structures of parish and town councils, and sets new rules for how local authorities are held to account. **The politics** The vote divided almost entirely along party lines. All 315 Labour and Labour and Co-operative MPs who voted backed the Bill, while Conservatives, Liberal Democrats, Reform UK and the Greens all voted against. The Liberal Democrats' opposition was notable given their stated commitment to localism; their spokesperson argued in debate that the Bill actually concentrates power upward toward combined authority mayors rather than delivering genuine local devolution. Several independent MPs and one DUP member voted with the government. The Bill had faced multiple amendment attempts on Report Stage the same day, all of which were defeated, including proposed new clauses on consent requirements for governance changes, parish council protections, and restrictions on private hire vehicle cross-border licensing. The passage of this Bill sits alongside related votes in early 2026 on local government finance, suggesting a broader legislative programme reshaping English local government that the government has been advancing consistently through this parliamentary session.
Voting Aye meant
Support devolving more powers to English mayors and local authorities, including giving mayoral strategic authorities greater control over local infrastructure and roads.
Voting No meant
Oppose this package of devolution reforms, whether due to concerns about the specific powers transferred, the pace of reform, or the impact on areas without mayoral structures.
501 voting MPs. Each dot is one vote; left-to-right by party. Grey dots in the centre are the 146 who did not vote.
Aye
No
Absent
Labour PartyWhipped Aye
286
0
76
Conservative and Unionist PartyWhipped No
0
96
20
Liberal DemocratsWhipped No
0
67
5
Labour and Co-operative PartyWhipped Aye
29
0
13
Independent
5
2
6
Scottish National Party
0
0
9
Reform UKWhipped No
0
8
—
Sinn Féin
0
0
7
Democratic Unionist PartyWhipped No
1
4
—
Green Party of England and Wales
0
2
2
Plaid Cymru
0
0
4
Social Democratic and Labour Party
0
0
2
Alliance Party of Northern Ireland
0
0
1
Speaker
0
0
1
Traditional Unionist Voice
0
1
—
Ulster Unionist Party
0
1
—
Your Party
1
0
—
Government has listened to concerns and is delivering new devolution powers including visitor levy, protecting councillor safety by not publishing home addresses, and setting national taxi licensing standards while strengthening local audit oversight.Labour · Voted aye · Read full speech (4,181 words) →
The Bill centralises power upward to combined authorities and statutory mayors at the expense of local voices, parish councils and genuine community empowerment; councils lack funding to implement new duties.Liberal Democrat · Voted no · Read full speech (1,417 words) →
Questioning whether the overnight visitor levy will apply to council areas without a mayor and whether foundational strategic authorities will have this power.Liberal Democrat · Voted no · Read full speech (859 words) →
Welcomes general power of competence for national park authorities but concerned that new unitary authorities should not dominate park authority board membership with a majority.Unknown · Voted no · Read full speech (215 words) →
Two local authorities in her constituency operate effective committee systems; questions why Government proposes additional hurdles for councils to continue operating this proven governance model.Liberal Democrat · Voted no · Read full speech (103 words) →
Raises point of order about Government pre-announcement of visitor levy via press release before statement to Parliament, contrasting with earlier ministerial claims of not pre-empting Chancellor.Conservative · Voted no · Read full speech (1,922 words) →
Sources
Division dataUK Parliament Votes API
DebateHansard · Commons
Stance analysisAI analysis · Claude 4.x
LicenceOpen Parliament Licence v3.0