Division · No. 367Tuesday, 25 November 2025Commons Devolution

English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill Report Stage: New Clause 69

189
Ayes
320
Noes
Defeated · Government won
139 did not vote
Analysis
Commons

Parliament voted on 25 November 2025 on New Clause 69 to the English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill during its Report Stage (the stage at which MPs debate and vote on proposed changes to a bill after it has been examined in committee). The clause, which would have added provisions to strengthen local democracy and community empowerment beyond what the government had already included in the bill, was defeated by 320 votes to 189. The defeat means that the additional local democracy and community empowerment measures proposed in New Clause 69 will not be included in the bill as it progresses toward becoming law. The bill, which covers areas including local government structures, a community right to buy, local audit arrangements, taxi and private hire vehicle licensing standards, and the ending of upward-only rent review clauses in commercial leases, will continue in the form the government has shaped it. Critics had argued that the bill, despite its title, risks drawing power upward toward combined authorities and statutory mayors rather than downward toward parishes, town councils and individual communities. The vote divided sharply along party lines. All Labour and Labour and Co-operative MPs who voted did so against the clause, providing the bulk of the 320 noes. The 189 ayes came from a cross-opposition alliance: 99 Conservatives, 67 Liberal Democrats, 8 Reform UK members, 5 Democratic Unionist Party members, 3 Greens, and a handful of independents and smaller party representatives. There were no Conservative or Liberal Democrat MPs voting with the government. The same day, a related division on New Clause 80 produced an almost identical result of 187 ayes to 320 noes, and the bill passed its Third Reading by 322 votes to 179, confirming that the government retained a comfortable majority throughout the day's proceedings.

Voting Aye meant
Support the opposition's amendments, including capping council tax rises for mayoral combined authorities in line with other councils, and expressing concern that the Bill centralises rather than genuinely devolves power
Voting No meant
Reject the opposition amendments and back the government's approach to devolution, arguing the Bill represents a genuine transfer of power to regions and communities
§ 01Who voted how.509 voting members · 139 absent
Aye189No321DID NOT VOTE · 139

509 voting MPs. Each dot is one vote; left-to-right by party. Grey dots in the centre are the 139 who did not vote.

Aye
No
Absent
Labour PartyWhipped No
0
289
73
Conservative and Unionist PartyWhipped Aye
99
0
17
Liberal DemocratsWhipped Aye
67
0
5
Labour and Co-operative PartyWhipped No
0
29
13
Independent
4
3
6
Scottish National Party
0
0
9
Reform UKWhipped Aye
8
0
Sinn Féin
0
0
7
Democratic Unionist PartyWhipped Aye
5
0
Green Party of England and WalesWhipped Aye
3
0
1
Plaid Cymru
0
0
4
Social Democratic and Labour Party
0
0
2
Alliance Party of Northern Ireland
0
0
1
Speaker
0
0
1
Traditional Unionist Voice
1
0
Ulster Unionist Party
1
0
Your Party
1
0
§ 02From the debate.6 principal speakers
Miatta FahnbullehSupportivePeckham
Government has listened to concerns and is delivering new devolution powers including visitor levy, protecting councillor safety by not publishing home addresses, and setting national taxi licensing standards while strengthening local audit oversight.Labour · Voted no · Read full speech (4,181 words)
Zöe FranklinOpposedGuildford
The Bill centralises power upward to combined authorities and statutory mayors at the expense of local voices, parish councils and genuine community empowerment; councils lack funding to implement new duties.Liberal Democrat · Voted aye · Read full speech (1,417 words)
Caroline VoadenQuestioningSouth Devon
Questioning whether the overnight visitor levy will apply to council areas without a mayor and whether foundational strategic authorities will have this power.Liberal Democrat · Voted aye · Read full speech (859 words)
Martin WrigleyNeutralNewton Abbot
Welcomes general power of competence for national park authorities but concerned that new unitary authorities should not dominate park authority board membership with a majority.Unknown · Voted aye · Read full speech (215 words)
Sarah OlneyOpposedRichmond Park
Two local authorities in her constituency operate effective committee systems; questions why Government proposes additional hurdles for councils to continue operating this proven governance model.Liberal Democrat · Voted aye · Read full speech (103 words)
David SimmondsNeutralRuislip, Northwood and Pinner
Raises point of order about Government pre-announcement of visitor levy via press release before statement to Parliament, contrasting with earlier ministerial claims of not pre-empting Chancellor.Conservative · Voted aye · Read full speech (1,922 words)
§ 03Related divisions.Same topic · recent
Sources
Division dataUK Parliament Votes API
DebateHansard · Commons
Stance analysisAI analysis · Claude 4.x
LicenceOpen Parliament Licence v3.0