Division · No. 364Monday, 24 November 2025Commons Devolution

English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill Report Stage: Amendment 85

57
Ayes
309
Noes
Defeated · Government won
281 did not vote
Analysis
Commons

**What happened**: On 24 November 2025, the House of Commons voted on Amendment 85 to the English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill during its Report Stage (the stage at which MPs debate and vote on proposed changes to a bill after it has been examined in detail by a committee). The amendment was defeated by 309 votes to 57, a margin of 252 votes. **Why it matters**: The English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill aims to transfer significant powers from central government to regional mayors and combined authorities across England, covering areas such as planning, transport, housing, skills and economic development. Amendment 85 sought to change aspects of how those devolved powers would be implemented. Its defeat means the government's preferred approach to English devolution remains intact, with no modification from this amendment. The bill affects local councils, mayors, businesses and communities across England, particularly those areas subject to local government reorganisation and new mayoral structures. **The politics**: The amendment was supported almost entirely by the Liberal Democrats, who provided 58 of the 57 recorded Ayes (with one Independent also voting in favour). Labour and Labour and Co-operative MPs voted unanimously against, providing 303 of the 309 Noes. The Conservatives, despite being the official opposition, were entirely absent from this division, recording 116 abstentions. This reflects a broader pattern across the Report Stage, in which the Liberal Democrats positioned themselves as the primary parliamentary challengers to specific provisions of the bill, while the Conservatives largely stood aside. The bill continued to face criticism from Conservative members in debate, who argued it represented centralisation rather than genuine devolution.

Voting Aye meant
Support removing or limiting the role of commissioners for mayors, arguing it reduces democratic accountability and concentrates power away from elected representatives and local communities
Voting No meant
Oppose the amendment, backing the government's plan to allow commissioners to support mayors of combined authorities as a useful governance tool
§ 01Who voted how.366 voting members · 281 absent
Aye59No309DID NOT VOTE · 281

366 voting MPs. Each dot is one vote; left-to-right by party. Grey dots in the centre are the 281 who did not vote.

Aye
No
Absent
Labour PartyWhipped No
0
274
88
Conservative and Unionist Party
0
0
116
Liberal DemocratsWhipped Aye
58
0
14
Labour and Co-operative PartyWhipped No
0
29
13
Independent
1
3
9
Scottish National Party
0
0
9
Reform UK
0
0
8
Sinn Féin
0
0
7
Democratic Unionist PartyWhipped No
0
3
2
Green Party of England and Wales
0
0
4
Plaid Cymru
0
0
4
Social Democratic and Labour Party
0
0
2
Alliance Party of Northern Ireland
0
0
1
Speaker
0
0
1
Traditional Unionist Voice
0
0
1
Ulster Unionist Party
0
0
1
Your Party
0
0
1
§ 02From the debate.2 principal speakers
Miatta FahnbullehSupportivePeckham
Moves New Clause 43 on charges for undertakers executing works in maintainable highways, introducing mayoral authority over highway charging.Labour · Voted no · Read full speech (6,191 words)
Ms Nusrat GhaniQuestioningSussex Weald
Leads discussion of multiple new clauses covering council tax limits, CIL exemptions, mayoral convening duties, and skills devolution—raising concerns about governance checks and local accountability.Conservative · Voted no_vote_recorded · Read full speech (14,874 words)
§ 03Related divisions.Same topic · recent
Sources
Division dataUK Parliament Votes API
DebateHansard · Commons
Stance analysisAI analysis · Claude 4.x
LicenceOpen Parliament Licence v3.0