Opposition Day: Taxes
101
Ayes
—
316
Noes
Defeated · Government won
231 did not vote
Analysis
Commons
Commons
**What happened:** On 12 November 2025, the House of Commons voted on a Conservative-tabled Opposition Day motion criticising the Labour government's taxation policies. The motion was defeated by 316 votes to 101. Opposition Day motions are debated on days allocated to opposition parties, and while they carry no binding legislative force, they serve as a formal parliamentary statement of criticism or alternative policy. **Why it matters:** The motion put on record Conservative objections to Labour's approach to taxation, including tax increases introduced since Labour took office. Although the vote itself changes no law, it reflects the political battle lines over fiscal policy at a time when several significant tax measures were moving through Parliament. The debate would have touched on the impact of tax rises on businesses, workers, and public services, with the two main parties disagreeing over whether higher taxes represent a burden on economic activity or a necessary investment in public provision. **The politics:** The vote divided almost entirely along party lines. All 281 voting Labour MPs and 28 Labour and Co-operative MPs voted against the motion, as did all four Green MPs and two independents, giving the government a comfortable majority. The Conservatives provided 95 of the 101 Aye votes, joined by three Reform UK MPs, one each from the Traditional Unionist Voice, the Ulster Unionist Party, and the Democratic Unionist Party, and two independents. The Conservatives had 21 members absent, while Labour had 81 absent. Plaid Cymru abstained entirely, with all four of their MPs not voting. The motion sits in a broader legislative context in which the government was advancing the National Insurance Contributions (Employer Pensions Contributions) Bill and the Finance (No. 2) Bill, both of which passed their respective votes in the months that followed.
Voting Aye meant
Support the opposition's position on taxes, likely criticising current government tax policy or calling for specific changes
Voting No meant
Reject the opposition's motion on taxes, defending the government's existing tax policy approach
417 voting MPs. Each dot is one vote; left-to-right by party. Grey dots in the centre are the 231 who did not vote.
Aye
No
Absent
Labour PartyWhipped No
0
281
81
Conservative and Unionist PartyWhipped Aye
95
0
21
Liberal Democrats
0
0
72
Labour and Co-operative PartyWhipped No
0
28
14
Independent
2
2
9
Scottish National Party
0
0
9
Reform UKWhipped Aye
3
0
5
Sinn Féin
0
0
7
Democratic Unionist Party
1
0
4
Green Party of England and WalesWhipped No
0
4
—
Plaid Cymru
0
0
4
Social Democratic and Labour Party
0
0
2
Alliance Party of Northern Ireland
0
0
1
Speaker
0
0
1
Traditional Unionist Voice
1
0
—
Ulster Unionist Party
1
0
—
Your Party
0
0
1
The government has systematically broken tax promises, with employer national insurance rises destroying growth and jobs; spending must be controlled rather than taxes raised further.Conservative · Voted aye · Read full speech (3,802 words) →
The government inherited a difficult fiscal situation and tough choices on tax were necessary; the Budget details will be revealed on 26 November and cannot be pre-announced.Labour · Voted no · Read full speech (2,929 words) →
The Conservatives caused lasting economic damage with the mini-Budget; progressive tax measures like bank windfall taxes and customs union reunion with the EU should fund public services instead of raising taxes on workers.Liberal Democrat · Voted no_vote_recorded · Read full speech (2,297 words) →
Conservative austerity and waste damaged public services; Labour's investment approach and spending controls are necessary to address child poverty, broken NHS, and neglected infrastructure.Labour · Voted no · Read full speech (2,756 words) →
Tax hikes on employers and high streets are killing growth; the family farm tax and business rates are crippling rural communities and must be reversed.Conservative · Voted aye · Read full speech (1,655 words) →
Low-income families in areas like Harlow cannot afford private services; tax-funded public investment is essential despite difficult fiscal circumstances.Labour · Voted no · Read full speech (1,663 words) →
Sources
Division dataUK Parliament Votes API
DebateHansard · Commons
Stance analysisAI analysis · Claude 4.x
LicenceOpen Parliament Licence v3.0